Voter choice in the 1995 French Presidential election

Political Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 305-324

  Dow, Jay K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033236522     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023374625945     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill III (1998). Spatial Models of Candidate Competition in the 1988 French Presidential Election: Are Presidential Candidates Vote-Maximizers? Presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association. Los Angeles, California.
2. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler (1995). Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election American Journal of Political Science 39:714-744.
3. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler (1998). When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Competition American Journal of Political Science 42:55-96.
4. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler (1999). Correlated Disturbances in Discrete Choice Models: A Comparison of Multinomial Probit Models and Logit Models Political Analysis: forthcoming.
5. Anderson, Christopher (1995). Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
6. Boy, Daniel and Nonna Mayer (eds.). 1993. The French Voter Decides. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Boy, Daniel, and Nonna Mayer (1993). The Changing French Voter. In Daniel Boy and Nonna Mayer (eds.), The French Voter Decides, pp. 167-186. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Cerney, P. G. (1972). Cleavage, Aggregation and Change in French Politics. British Journal of Political Science 2:443-455.
9. Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap-Harvard University Press.
10. Fleury, Christopher J., and Michael Lewis-Beck (1993). Anchoring the French Voter: Ideology vs. Party. Journal of Politics 55:1100-1109.
11. Goldey, D. B., and R. W. Johnson (1988). The French Presidential Election of 24 April-8 May and the General Election of 5-12 June 1989. Electoral Studies 7:195-223.
12. Goldey, D. B., and A. F. Knapp (1996). The French Presidential Election of 23 April-7 May 1995. Electoral Studies 15:97-109.
13. Haegel, Florence (1993). Partisan Ties. In Daniel Boy and Nonna Mayer (eds.), The French Voter Decides, pp. 131-148. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14. King, Gary (1989). Unifying Political Methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1984). France: The Stalled Electorate. In Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanagan and Paul Allen Beck (eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, pp. 425-448. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Lewis-Beck Michael S. (1986). Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany and Italy. American Journal of Political Science 30:315-46.
17. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1988). Economics and Elections in the Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1993). The French Voter - Steadfast or Changing? In Daniel Boy and Nonna Mayer (eds.), The French Voter Decides, pp. 1-14. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1996). Electoral Inquiry Cross-national Election Surveys: A French Pre-Test. Electoral Studies 15:513-528.
20. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Nonna Mayer and Daniel Boy et al. French National Election Study, 1995 [Computer File]. ICPSR Version. Iowa City, IA: Michael S. Lewis-Beck University of Iowa, Dept. of Political Science/Paris, France: Nonna Mayer and Daniel Boy et al., Centre d'Etude de la Vie Politique Francaise [producers], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996.
21. Lewis Beck, Michael S., and Glenn E. Mitchell II (1993). French Electoral Theory: The National Front Test. Electoral Studies 12:112-127.
22. Lewis-Beck, Michale S., and Andrew Skalaban (1992). France. In Mark Franklin, Tom Mackie and Henry Valen (eds.), Electoral Change, pp. 167-178. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Long, J. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Michelat, Guy. (1993). In Search of Left and Right. In Daniel Boy and Nonna Mayer (eds.), The French Voter Decides, pp. 65-90. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26. Michelat, Guy, and Michel Simon (1977). Religion, Class and Politics. Comparative Politics 10:159-84.
27. Percheron, Annick (1977). Ideological Proximity among French Children: Problems of Definition and Measurement. European Journal of Political Research: 5:53-81.
28. Pierce, Roy (1995). Choosing the Chief: Presidential Elections in France and the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Schofield, Norman et al. (1998). Multiparty Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit. Public Choice 97:257-293.
30. Stokes, Donald E. (1992) Valence Politics. In Dennis Kavanagh (ed.), Electoral Politics, pp. 141-165. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Szarka, Joseph (1997). Campaign Strategies in the 1995 French Presidential Elections: A Candidate Interaction Analysis. Political Science 48:135-161.
32. Whitten, Guy D., and Harvey D. Palmer (1996). Heightening Comparative's Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands. American Journal of Political Science 40:231-260.