Intentional pulp capping: A clinical perspective of the adhesive experience

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 345-363

  Liebenberg, William H ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DISINFECTION; ENDODONTICS; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; REVIEW;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DISINFECTION; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; RESIN CEMENTS; RUBBER DAMS;

EID: 0033233523     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: A clinical study. Oper Dent 1991:16:130-135.
2. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Retentive and morphological characteristics of enamel following 15 and 60 second acid conditioning. Oper Dent 1986;11:111.
3. Benn DK, Watson TF. Correlation between film position, bitewing shadows, clinical pitfalls, and the historical size of approximal lesions. Quintessence Int 1989:20:131-141.
4. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982:11:439-50.
5. Bergenholtz G. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Impact on the pulp. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Criteria for Placement and Replacement of Dental Restorations, 19-21 Oct 1987, Lake Buena Vista, FL. Chicago: Quintessence,1989:243-251.
6. Brännström M, Nyborg H. The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate and composite resin materials. Swed Dent J 1971:64:149-155.
7. Brännström M, Johnson G, Linden LA. Fluid flow and pain response in the dentin produced by hydrostatic pressure. Odontol Rev 1969:20:15-30.
8. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of concise enamel bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities. J Dent Res 1978;57:3-10.
9. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Pulpal reaction to compostie resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:181-189.
10. Brännström M, Vojinovic 0. Response of the dental pulp to invasion of bacteria around three filling materials. J Dent Child 1976:43:15-21.
11. Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1987:12:158-163.
12. Brännström M. Infection beneath composite resin restorations: can it be avoided? Oper Dent 1987:12:158-163.
13. IS. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955:34:849-853.
14. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S. Biological aspects. In: Dondi dall'Orologio G, Fuzzi M, Prati C (eds). Adhesion in Restorative Dentistry. Forli, Italy: Valbonesi,1996:77-86.
15. Cotton WR. Pulp response to an airstream directed into human cavity preparations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967:24:78-88.
16. Cox C, Keall C, Keall H, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:l-8.
17. Cox CF, Sübay RK, Suzuki S, et al. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:240-251.
18. Cox CF. Biocompatability of dental materials in absence of bacterial infection. Oper Dent 1987;12:146-152.
19. Cvek M. A clinical report on partial pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide in permanent incisors with complicated crown fracture. J Endod 1978:4:232-237.
20. Dankert J, s'Gravenmade EJ, Wemes JC. Diffusion of formocresol and glutaraldehyde through dentin and cementum. J Endod 1976;2:42-46.
21. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composite. J Dent Res 1984:63:146-148.
22. Dijkman GEHM, Jongebloed WL, de Vries J, Ogaard B, Arends J. Closing of dentinal tubules by glutaraldehyde treatment: a scanning electron microscope study. Scand J Dent Res 1994:102:144-150.
23. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986:17:103-111.
24. Erickson RL Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1989:2:117-123.
25. Feilzer A, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987:66:1636-1639.
26. Felton D, Hergenholtz G, Cox CF. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment. J Dent Res 1989:68:491-495.
27. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K, Vichi A, Finger WJ. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of adhesive restorative systems. Am J Dent 1994:7:312-314.
28. Foreman PC, Barnes IE. Review of calcium hydroxide. Int EndodontJ 1990:23:283-297.
29. Fujitani M, Inokoshi S, Hosoda H. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations. Int Dent J 1992:42:3-11.
30. SO. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of a pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987;18:633-641.
31. Fusayama T. New Concepts in Operative Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1980.
32. Fusayama T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:105-109.
33. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 1979;4:63-70.
34. Goracci G, Giovanni M, Casa de' Martinis L. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27:355-362.
35. SS. Gwinnett AJ, Dickerson WG, Yu S. Dentin bond shear strength and microleakage for Syntac/Heliomolar: A comparson between the manufacturer's and total etch technique. J Esthet Dent 1992:4:164-168.
36. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J III. Micromorphological relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992; 5:19-23.
37. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation bonding agents. Am J Dent 1994;7:312-3i4.
38. SS. Gwinnett AJ. Effect of cavity disinfection on bond strength to dentin. J Esthet Dent 1992;4(suppl):ll-13.
39. McLean JW, Kramer IRH. A clinical and pathological evaluation of a sulphinic acid activated resin for use in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 1952; 93:255-269.
40. Heitmann T, Unterbrink G. Direct pulp capping with a dentinal adhesive resin system: A pilot study. Quintessence Int 1995;26:765-770.
41. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, et al. The role of a dentin bonding agent in reducing cervical dentin sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1998:25:268-290.
42. lnokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harniratissai C, Shimida Y, Tatsumi T. A study of the resin impregnated layer of dentin. Part I. A comparative study of the decalcified and undecalcified sections and the application of argon ion beam etching to disclose the resin impregnated layer of dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1990:33:427-442.
43. lnokoshi S, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Pulpal response to a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1982:61:1014-1019.
44. Kainins V, Frisbie HE. The effect of dentin fragments on the healing of the exposed pulp. Archs Oral Biol 1960:2:96-103.
45. Kanca J III. A method for bonding to tooth structure using phosphoric acid as a dentin-enamel conditioner. Quintessence Int 1991:22:285-290.
46. Kanca J III. Replacement of a fractured incisor fragment over pulpal exposure: A case report. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:81-84.
47. Kanehira M, Yarnanaka H, Okuda R. Composite resin filling restored by using GLUMA bonding system. Dent Mater J 1987:30:1588-1599.
48. Katoh M, Kidokoro S, Kirosu K. A study on the amputation of pulp using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI). Jpn J Pediat Dent 1978:16:107-116.
49. Kay EJ, Nuttall NM, Knill-Jones R. Restorative treatment thresholds and agreement in treatment decision-making. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:265-8.
50. Kidd EA, Joyston BS, Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: A biological assessment. Br Dent J 1993:174:245-248.
51. Kopel HM, Bernick S, Zachrisson E, DeRomero SA. The effects of glutaraldehyde on primary pulp tissue following coronal amputation: An in vivo histological study. ASDC J Dent Child 1980:47:425-430.
52. Krejci l, Küster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;71:49O494.
53. Lefkowitz W, Seelig A, Zachinsky L Pulp response to self-curing acrylic filling materials. NY Dent J 1949:15:373-386.
54. Liebenberg WH. Alternative gingival retraction techniques and isolation of the cervical lesion. J Am Dent Assoc 1993:124:92-102.
55. Liebenberg WH. An innovative method of cushioning the jaws of metal clamps during rubber dam isolation. J Cnd Dent Assoc 1995:61:10.
56. Liebenberg WH. Dealing with probationary restorative solutions in clinical practice. J Can Dent Assoc 1999;65:582584.
57. Liebenberg WH. Direct pulp capping considerations during fragment reattachment. A case report. J SA Dent Assoc 1993:48:28-32.
58. Liebenberg WH. Extending the use of rubber-dam isolation: alternative procedures. Part 3. Quintessence Int 1993;24: 237-244.
59. Liebenberg WH. Posterior composite resin restorations: Operative Innovations. Pract Periodont and Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:769-780.
60. Liebenberg WH. Secondary retention of rubber dam: a pictorial essay demonstrating effective moisture control and access considerations. Quintessence Int 1995:26:243-252.
61. Liebenberg WH. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1996:62:501-507.
62. Liebenberg WH. The rubber-dam retaining (RDR) appliance: an adjunct to isolation in multiple porcelain veneers. J Esth Dent 1996:8:157-169.
63. Lösche GM. Marginal Adaptation of Class II Composite Fillings: Guided Polymerization vs Reduced Light Intensity. J Adhesive Dent 1999:1:31-39.
64. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Liu M, Kim S. Biological properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically orientated review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992:73:729-737.
65. Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Harcourt JK. The influence of various cavity bases on the microhardness of composites. Aust Dent J 1982:27:291-295.
66. Mehare B, Mejare I, Edwardson S. Bacteria beneath composite resorations: A culturing and histobacteriological study. Odontol Scand 1979:37:267-275.
67. Melers JC, Griffo TE, Miller GA. Antimicrobial Activity of Dentin Bonding Systems and Glass lonomers [abstract 1639]. J Dent Res 1992;71(special issue):310.
68. Mjör IA, Tronstad L. The healing of experimentally induced pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974:38:115-121.
69. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991:3:13-138.
70. Nakabayashi N. Adhesive bonding with 4-META. Oper Dent 1992;17(suppl 5):125-130.
71. Nelsen RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952; 44:288-293.
72. 0hgushi K, Fusayama J. The affected and infected pulp. Oral Surg Med Oral Pathol. 1977:42:929-947.
73. 0noe N. Study on adhesive bonding systems as a direct pulp capping agent. Jpn Conserv Dent 1994:37:429-466.
74. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998;26:555-562.
75. Pagliarini A, Rubini R, Rea M, Campese C, Grandini R. Effectiveness of the current enamel-dentinal adhesives: A new methodology for its evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996;27: 265-270.
76. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR. The disastrous effects of the "Total Etch" technique in vital pulp capping in primates. Am J Dent 1998;ll(special issue):45-54.
77. Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate: A review. Scanning Microsc 1989:3:161-176.
78. Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993:9:19-22.
79. Prati C, Biagini G, Rizzoli C, et al. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of dentinal bonding systems. Am J Dent 1990:3:283-288.
80. SO. Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability, and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1992:5:33-38.
81. ProBond Simplified Dry Brush Technique. Probond technical data sheet. Milford, DE: Dentsply Caulk, 1994.
82. Relief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM, Denys FR. Evaluation of the Syntac bonding system. Am J Dent 1993;6:17-21.
83. Relief DH. Effects of conditioning the enamel surface with phosphoric acid. J Dent Res 1973:52:333-341.
84. Shintani H, Satou N, Satou J. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composites retained with bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1989:62:627-632.
85. SS. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, et al. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699705.
86. Stanley H. Pulp capping: Conserving the dental pulp - Can it be done? Is it worth it? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989:68:628-639.
87. Stanley HR, Pameijer CH. Dentistry's friend: Calcium hydroxide. Oper Dent 1997;22:l-3.
88. 88-Stanley HR, Swerdlow H, Stanwhich L, Suarez C. A comparison of the biological effects of filling materials with recommendations for pulp protection. Am Acad Gold Foil Oper 1967:12:56-62.
89. Stanley HR. Criteria for standardizing and increasing credibility of direct pulp capping studies. Am J Dent 1998;ll(special issue):17-34.
90. Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for double ring-opening polymerization. J Dent Res 1992:71:1408-1412.
91. Stockton LW. Vital pulp capping: a worthwhile procedure. J Can Dent Assoc 1999:65:328-331.
92. Suzuki S, Cox CF, White KC. Pulpal response after complete crown preparation, dentinal sealing, and provisional restoration. Quintessence Int 1994:25:477-485.
93. Swift EJ, Trope M. Treatment options for the exposed vital pulp. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1999:11:735-739.
94. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996:12:236-244.
95. Thylstrup A, Bille J, Qvist V. Radiographie and observed tissue changes in approximal caries lesions at the time of operative treatment. Caries Res 1986:20:75-84.
96. Tsuneda Y, Hayakawa T, Yamamoto H, et al. A histopathologi cal study of direct pulp capping with adhesive resins. Oper Dent 1995:20:223-229.
97. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995:26:733-738.
98. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives. " Literary review and clinical recommendations. Ql 1999;30:249-257.
99. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vannerie G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive system. J Dent Res 1992:71:1530-1540.
100. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigào J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
101. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W H. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998:77:14351445.
102. Watanabe LG, Staninec M, Harner A, et al. Operator experience effects on dentin bonding strength [abstract]. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):232.
103. 103-White KG, Cox CF, Kanca J III, Dixon D, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Histologie pulpal response of acid etching vital dentin. Quintessence Int 1994:25:259-268.
104. Wirthlin M. Acid-reacting stains, softening and bacterial invasion in human carious dentin. J Dent Res 1970:49:42-46.
105. 105-Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, et al. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 1995:8:297-302.