Breast cancer detected at the second screening round: Analysis of radiological features on previous mammograms;Il carcinoma mammario diagnosticato nello screening mammografico nei passaggi di incidenza: Ricerca dei segni radiologici sulle mammografie precedenti

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 342-346

  Marra, Vincenzo ^a   Frigerio, Alfonso ^a   Di Virgilio, Maria Rosaria ^a   Menna, Sabatino ^a   Burke, Paolo ^a  

^a MOLINETTE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma, mammography; Breast carcinoma, screening; Breast, carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033222443     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barrett JR, de Paredes ES, Dwyer SJ III e Coll: Unobstrusively tracking eye gaze direction and pupil diameter of mammographers. Acad Radiol 1: 40-45, 1994.
2. Catarzi S, Morrone D, Ambrogetti D e Coll: L'errore nella mammografia. II. I falsi positivi. Radiol Med 83: 201-205, 1992.
3. Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Bonardi R e Coll: Screening mammografico: analisi delle caratteristiche dei carcinomi di intervallo osservati nel programma in provincia di Firenze (1989-1991). Radiol Med 87: 412-416, 1994.
4. Daly CA, Apthorp L, Field S: Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier? Clin Radiol 53: 25-28, 1998.
5. De Wolf CJM, Perry NM: European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Office Official Publications European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996.
6. Duncan AA, Wallis MG: Classifying interval cancers. Clin Radiol 50: 774-777, 1995.
7. Duncan KA, Needham G, Gilbert FJ e Coll: Incident round cancers: what lesson can we learn? Clin Radiol 53: 29-32, 1998.
8. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH e Coll: Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331: 1493-1499, 1994.
9. Frigerio A, Marra V: Breast calcifications: diagnostic relevance in a screening context. Atti II European Congress Senology, Vienna (Austria), 1994, pag. 51-54. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, 1994.
10. Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GP e Coll: Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204: 131-135, 1997.
11. Marra V, Frigerio A, Di Virgilio MR e Coll: Le indicazioni chirurgiche nel programma di screening mammografico di Torino. Limitazione del rischio di sovrastima. Atti Convegno Nazionale SIRM - Sezione di Senologia. Napoli, 1995. pag. 217-220. Giuseppe De Nicola Editore, Napoli, 1995.
12. Morrone D, Ambrogetti D, Bravetti P e Coll: L'errore in mammografia. I. I falsi negativi. Radiol Med 82: 212-217, 1991.
13. Patel MR, Whitman GJ: Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. Acad Radiol 5: 26-33, 1998.
14. Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J e Coll: Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 3: 18-22, 1996.
15. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Dav NE: What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the last results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer 55: 547-551, 1987.
16. Thurfjell E: Mammography screening: one versus two views and independent double reading. Acta Radiol 35: 345-350, 1994.
17. Vanara F, Ponti A, Frigerio A e Coll.: Analisi dei costi di un programma di screening mammografico. Epidemiol Prev 19: 318-329, 1995.