Gradient expressions for a closed-loop identification scheme with a tailor-made parametrization

Automatica

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1867-1871

  De Bruyne, Franky ^a   Anderson, Brian D O ^a   Gevers, Michel ^b   Linard, Natasha ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SYSTEM STABILITY;

GRADIENT EXPRESSIONS; NONLINEAR IDENTIFICATION; TAILOR MADE PARAMETRIZATION;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 0033221547     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00108-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. De Bruyne, F., Anderson, B., Gevers, M., & Linard, N. (1997). Iterative controller optimization for nonlinear systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control (Pp. 3749-3754). San Diego, USA.
2. De Bruyne, F., Anderson, B., Gevers, M., & Linard, N. (1998). On closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parametrization. Proceedings of the American Control Conference (Pp. 3177-3181). Philadelphia, USA.
3. Desoer, C., & Vidyasagar, M. (1975). Feedback Systems: Input and Output Properties. New York: Electrical Science Series, Academic Press.
4. Egardt, B. (1997). On the role of noise models for approximate closed-loop identification. CD Proceedings of the European Control Conference, Brussels, Belgium. TH-A-F3 (634).
5. Gevers, M. (1993). Towards a joint design of identification and control? in H. L. Trentelman, & J. C. Willems, Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and Its Applications (Pp. 111-151). Basel: Birkhäuser.
6. Gevers, M., Ljung, L., & Van den Hof, P. (1997). Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification and their relevance in identification for control. Proceeding of the Symposium on System Identification (Pp. 1449-1454). Fukuoka, Japan.
7. Hammer, J. (1987). Fraction representations of nonlinear systems: A simplified approach. International Journal of Control, 46, 455-472.
8. Hjalmarsson, H., Gevers, M., Gunnarsson, S., & Lequin, O. (1998). Iterative feedback tuning: Theory and applications. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 18, 26-41.
9. Landau, I., & Karimi, A. (1997). An output error recursive algorithm for unbiased identification in closed-loop. Automatica, 33, 933-938.
10. Ljung, L. (1987). System Identification: Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Ljung, L. (1997). Identification in closed-loop: Some aspects on direct and indirect approaches. Proceedings of the Symposium on System Identification (Pp. 141-146). Fukuoka, Japan.
12. Sjöberg, J., & Agarwal, M. (1996). Model-free repetitive control design for nonlinear systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control (Pp. 2824-2829). Kobe, Japan.
13. Sjöberg, J., Zhang, Q., Ljung, L., Benveniste, A., Deylon, B., Glorennec, P. -Y., Hjalmarsson, H., & Juditsky, A. (1995). Non-linear black-box modeling in system identification: A unified overview. Automatica, 31, 1691-1724.
14. Söderström, T., & Stoica, P. (1989). System Identification. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire: Prentice-Hall International.
15. Van den Hof, P. (1997). Closed-loop issues in system identification. Proceedings of the Symposium on System Identification (Pp. 1651-1664). Fukuoka, Japan.
16. Van Donkelaar, E., & Van den Hof, P. (1996). Analysis of closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parametrization. Selected Topics in Identification, Modelling and Control, 9, 17-24.