On closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parametrization

Proceedings of the American Control Conference

Volumn 5, Issue , 1998, Pages 3177-3181

  De Bruyne, Franky ^a   Anderson, Brian D O ^a   Gevers, Michel ^b   Linard, Natasha ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Estimation; Identification for control; Nonlinear identification

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP IDENTIFICATION; CLOSED-LOOP CONFIGURATIONS; IDENTIFICATION CRITERION; IDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL; NONLINEAR IDENTIFICATIONS; NONLINEAR PLANT; PARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION; PARAMETRIZATIONS;

CONTROL; ESTIMATION;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 0006448856     PISSN: 07431619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ACC.1998.688448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Egardt B. (1997). On the role of noise models for approximate closed loop identification. CD Proceedings of the European Control conference, Brussels, Belgium, TH-A-F3 (634).
2. Desoer C.A. and M. Vidyasagar (1975). Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties. Electrical Science Series, Academic Press, New York.
3. th Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA, 3749-3754.
4. Gevers M. (1993). Towards a joint design of identification and control ? Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and its Applications. H.L. Trentelman and J.C. Willems Editors, Birkhäuser, 111-151.
5. Gevers M., L. Ljung, P.M.J. Van den Hof (1997). Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification and their relevance in identification for control. Proceeding of the Symposium on System Identification, Fukuoka, Japan, 1449-1454.
6. Hjalmarsson H., S. Gunnarsson and M. Gevers (1994). Model-free data-driven optimal tuning of controller parameters. Technical Report LiTH-ISY-R-1680, Linköping University.
7. Hammer J. (1987). Fraction representations of nonlinear systems: a simplified approach. International Journal of control, 46, 455-472.
8. Hansen F.R. (1989). A Fractional Representation Approach to Closed-loop System Identification and Experiment Design. Ph. D. Thesis, Stanford University, USA.
9. th IFAC World Congress, San Francisco, USA, 215-220.
10. th Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA, 2998-3003.
11. Linard N., B.D.O. Anderson and F. De Bruyne (1997). Identification of a nonlinear plant under nonlinear feedback using left coprime fraction based representations, submitted to Automatica.
12. Ljung L. (1978). Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods. IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 23, 770-783.
13. Ljung L. (1987). System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
14. Ljung L. (1997). Identification in closed-loop: Some aspects on direct and indirect approaches. Proceedings of the 11 IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Fukuoka, Japan, 141-146.
15. th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, 2824-2829.
16. Van den Hof P.M.J, and R.J.P. Schrama (1993). An Indirect Method for Transfer Function Estimation from Closed Loop Data. Automatica, 29, 1523-1527.
17. th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Fukuoka, Japan, 1651-1664.
18. nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Antonio, USA, 2839-2844.
19. Van Donkelaar E.T. and P.M.J. Van den Hof (1996). Analysis of closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parametrization. Selected Topics in Identification, Modelling and control, 9, 17-24.
20. Zang Z., R.R. Bitrnead and M. Gevers (1995). Iterative Weighted Least Squares Identification and Weighted LQG Control Design. Automatica, 31, 1577-1594.