-
1
-
-
0002293298
-
-
Mark, H. F., Bikales, N. M., Overberger, C. C., Menges, G., Kroschwitz, J. I., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York
-
(a) Clinton, N.; Matlock, P. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed.; Mark, H. F., Bikales, N. M., Overberger, C. C., Menges, G., Kroschwitz, J. I., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986; Vol. 6, pp 225-273.
-
(1986)
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd Ed.
, vol.6
, pp. 225-273
-
-
Clinton, N.1
Matlock, P.2
-
5
-
-
0032580354
-
-
For a review of polymeric drug delivery, see: Langer, R. Nature 1998, 392, 5-10.
-
(1998)
Nature
, vol.392
, pp. 5-10
-
-
Langer, R.1
-
6
-
-
33745583553
-
-
Mark, H. F., Bikales, N. M., Overberger, C. C., Menges, G., Kroschwitz, J. I., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, and references therein.
-
For examples see: Body, R. W.; Kyllingstad, V. L. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed.; Mark, H. F., Bikales, N. M., Overberger, C. C., Menges, G., Kroschwitz, J. I., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986; Vol. 6, pp 307-322 and references therein.
-
(1986)
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd Ed.
, vol.6
, pp. 307-322
-
-
Body, R.W.1
In, K.V.L.2
-
7
-
-
33746236970
-
-
(a) Schwab, P.; France, M. B.; Ziller, J. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2039-2041.
-
(1995)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.34
, pp. 2039-2041
-
-
Schwab, P.1
France, M.B.2
Ziller, J.W.3
Grubbs, R.H.4
-
8
-
-
0001855961
-
-
(b) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 100-110.
-
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.118
, pp. 100-110
-
-
Schwab, P.1
Grubbs, R.H.2
Ziller, J.W.3
-
10
-
-
33745532975
-
-
(b) Wagener, K. B.; Brzezinska, K.; Bauch, C. G. Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun. 1992, 13, 74-81.
-
(1992)
Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun.
, vol.13
, pp. 74-81
-
-
Wagener, K.B.1
Brzezinska, K.2
Bauch, C.G.3
-
11
-
-
0030791288
-
-
Marsella, M. J.; Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1101-1103.
-
(1997)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.36
, pp. 1101-1103
-
-
Marsella, M.J.1
Maynard, H.D.2
Grubbs, R.H.3
-
12
-
-
0001090765
-
-
Lynn, D. M.; Kanaoka, S.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 784-790.
-
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.118
, pp. 784-790
-
-
Lynn, D.M.1
Kanaoka, S.2
Grubbs, R.H.3
-
15
-
-
0030959024
-
-
Manning, D. D.; Hu, X.; Beck, P.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3161-3162.
-
(1997)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.119
, pp. 3161-3162
-
-
Manning, D.D.1
Hu, X.2
Beck, P.3
Kiessling, L.L.4
-
17
-
-
1542531169
-
-
Gibson, V. C.; Marsball, E. L.; North, M.; Robson, D. A.; Williams, P. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1095-1096.
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 1095-1096
-
-
Gibson, V.C.1
Marsball, E.L.2
North, M.3
Robson, D.A.4
Williams, P.5
-
18
-
-
0030949964
-
-
Biagini, S. C. G.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R.; Marshall, E. L.; North, M. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1097-1098.
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 1097-1098
-
-
Biagini, S.C.G.1
Gibson, V.C.2
Giles, M.R.3
Marshall, E.L.4
North, M.5
-
19
-
-
37049079832
-
-
(a) Coles, M. P.; Gibson, V. C.; Mazzariol, L.; North, M.; Teasdale, W. G.; Williams, C. M.; Zamuner, D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2505-2506.
-
(1994)
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
, pp. 2505-2506
-
-
Coles, M.P.1
Gibson, V.C.2
Mazzariol, L.3
North, M.4
Teasdale, W.G.5
Williams, C.M.6
Zamuner, D.7
-
20
-
-
0032028088
-
-
(b) Biagini, S. C. G.; Coles, M. P.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R. Marshall, E. L.; North, M. Polymer 1998, 39, 1007-1014.
-
(1998)
Polymer
, vol.39
, pp. 1007-1014
-
-
Biagini, S.C.G.1
Coles, M.P.2
Gibson, V.C.3
Giles, M.R.4
Marshall, E.L.5
North, M.6
-
21
-
-
0033531353
-
-
Biagini, S. C. G.; Davies, R. G.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R.; Marshall, E. L.; North, M.; Robson, D. A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 235-236.
-
(1999)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 235-236
-
-
Biagini, S.C.G.1
Davies, R.G.2
Gibson, V.C.3
Giles, M.R.4
Marshall, E.L.5
North, M.6
Robson, D.A.7
-
22
-
-
0001647405
-
-
Miller, S. J.; Kim, S.-H.; Chen, Z. -R.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2108-2109.
-
(1995)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.117
, pp. 2108-2109
-
-
Miller, S.J.1
Kim, S.-H.2
Chen, Z.R.3
Grubbs, R.H.4
-
23
-
-
85034517336
-
-
Ether was more effective than hexanes for the precipitation removal of residual catalyst and monomer.
-
Ether was more effective than hexanes for the precipitation removal of residual catalyst and monomer.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
33845560987
-
-
For a review of Crabtree's catalyst see: Crabtree, R. Ace. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 331-339. -
-
(1979)
Ace. Chem. Res.
, vol.12
, pp. 331-339
-
-
Crabtree, R.1
-
25
-
-
85034497008
-
-
Typically, poly(ethylene glycol) refers to polymers with molecular weights below 20 000 and poly(ethylene oxide) refers to higher molecular weights above 100 000. The upper molecular weight limit for polyethylene glycoDs is due to side reactions during the industrial scale base-catalyzed polymerization of ethylene oxide; see ref 1.
-
Typically, poly(ethylene glycol) refers to polymers with molecular weights below 20 000 and poly(ethylene oxide) refers to higher molecular weights above 100 000. The upper molecular weight limit for poly(ethylene glycoDs is due to side reactions during the industrial scale base-catalyzed polymerization of ethylene oxide; see ref 1.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
85034497017
-
-
Propagating akylidene degradation could be slowed by the use of some additives such as a,a-dichlorotoluene. The reasons for this are under investigation. Maynard, H. D.; . Grubbs, R. H., unpublished results.
-
Propagating akylidene degradation could be slowed by the use of some additives such as a,a-dichlorotoluene. The reasons for this are under investigation. Maynard, H. D.; . Grubbs, R. H., unpublished results.
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
0031078006
-
-
(a) Hillmyer, M. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 718-721.
-
(1997)
Macromolecules
, vol.30
, pp. 718-721
-
-
Hillmyer, M.A.1
Nguyen, S.T.2
Grubbs, R.H.3
-
32
-
-
85034504269
-
-
Another explanation for the non-Gaussian molecular weight distributions is that the monomers were forming homopolymers rather than copolymers. However, this is less likely because the Tg scale proportionally between those of the two homopolymers (-59.0 °C for 11 and 24.5 °C for 13e) as one would expect for the copolymers.
-
Another explanation for the non-Gaussian molecular weight distributions is that the monomers were forming homopolymers rather than copolymers. However, this is less likely because the Tg scale proportionally between those of the two homopolymers (-59.0 °C for 11 and 24.5 °C for 13e) as one would expect for the copolymers.
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
85034495309
-
-
In this case [M]/[C] is the ratio of repeat unit to catalyst concentration.
-
In this case [M]/[C] is the ratio of repeat unit to catalyst concentration.
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
5244370033
-
-
Pangborn, A. B.; Giardello, M. A.; Grubbs, R. H.; Rosen, R. K; Timmers, F. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1518-1520.
-
(1996)
Organometallics
, vol.15
, pp. 1518-1520
-
-
Pangborn, A.B.1
Giardello, M.A.2
Grubbs, R.H.3
Rosen, R.K.4
Timmers, F.J.5
|