Second-order reversed phi

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1075-1088

  Lu, Zhong Lin ^a   Sperling, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0033174530     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03207615     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ADELSON, E. H., & BERGEN, J. K. (1985). Spatio-temporal energy models for the perception of apparent motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299.
2. ANSTIS, S. M. (1970). Phi movement as a subtraction process. Vision Research, 10, 1411-1430.
3. ANSTIS, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14, 589-592.
4. ANSTIS, S. M., & ROGERS, B. J. (1975). Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast. Vision Research, 15, 957-961.
5. BURT, P., & SPERLING, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171-195.
6. CAVANAGH, P., & MATHER, G. (1989). Motion: The long and the short of it. Spatial Vision, 4, 103-129.
7. CHUBB, C., & SPERLING, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random stimuli: A general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 1986-2006.
8. CHUBB, C., & SPERLING, G. (1989a). Second-order motion perception: Space-time separable mechanisms. In Proceedings: Workshop on visual motion (pp. 126-138). Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
9. CHUBB, C., & SPERLING, G. (1989b). Two motion perception mechanisms revealed by distance driven reversal of apparent motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 86, 2985-2989.
10. CHUBB, C., & SPERLING, G. (1991). Texture quilts: Basic tools for studying motion-from-texture. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 411-442.
11. CHUBB, C., SPERLING, G., & SOLOMON, J. A. (1989). Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 86, 9631-9635.
12. DERRINGTON, A. M., & BADCOCK, D. R. (1985). Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? Vision Research, 25, 1869-1878.
13. DOSHER, B. A., LANDY, M. S., & SPERLING, G. (1989). Kinetic depth effect and optic flow: 1. 3D shape from Fourier motion. Vision Research, 29, 1789-1813.
14. EMERSON, R. C., BERGEN, J. R., & ADELSON, E. H. (1992). Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Research, 32, 203-218.
15. EXNER, S. (1875). Über das Sehen von Bewegungen und die Theorie des zusammensetzen Auges. Sitzungsbericht Akademie Wissenschaft (math.-naturw.), 72, 156-190.
16. GOREA, A. (1995). Spatiotemporal characterization of a Fourier and non-Fourier motion system. Vision Research, 35, 907-914.
17. HALL, P., & GEGENFURTNER, K. (1988). Run-Time Library, The HIPL picture processing software. New York: New York University, Psychology Department, Human Information Processing Laboratory. University.
18. KNUTSSON, H., & GRANLUND, G. H. (1983). Texture analysis using two-dimensional quadrature filters. In 1983 IEEE Computer Society workshop on computer architecture for pattern analysis and image database management (pp. 206-213). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
19. LANDY, M. S., COHEN, Y., & SPERLING, G. (1984). HIPS: Image processing under UNIX. Software and applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 199-216.
20. LANDY, M. S., COHEN, Y., & SPERLING, G. (1984b). HIPS: A Unixbased image processing system. Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, 25, 331-347.
21. LELKINS, A. M. M., & KOENDERINK, J. J. (1984). Illusory motion in visual displays. Vision Research, 24, 293-300.
22. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1995a). Attention-generated motion perception. Nature, 377, 237-239.
23. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1995b). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722.
24. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1996a). Contrast gain control in first- and second-order motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 13, 2305-2318.
25. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1996b). The existence of second-order reversed phi: A prediction from a theory of motion perception (Tech. Rep. MBS 96-01, pp. 1-6). University of California, Irvine, Institute of Mathematical Behavioral Sciences.
26. Lu, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1996c). The three mechanisms of human visual motion detection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 44-53.
27. LU, Z.-L., & SPERLING, G. (1999). The amplification principle in motion perception [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 40 (4), S199.
28. MILLODOT, M., JOHNSON, C. A., LAMONT, A., & LEIBOWITZ, H. A. (1975). Effect of dioptrics on peripheral visual acuity. Vision Research, 15, 1357-1362.
29. NISHIDA, S. (1993). Spatiotemporal properties of motion perception for random-check contrast modulations. Vision Research, 33, 633-645.
30. PANTLE, A. (1992). Immobility of some second-order stimuli in human peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 863-867.
31. PAPATHOMAS, T. V., & RAMANUJAN, K. S. (1995). Grouping in sparse reverse-contrast static flow (glass) patterns. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36 (ARVO Suppl., 477).
32. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., RAO, M. V., & VIDYASAGAR, T. R. (1973). Apparent movement with subjective contours. Vision Research, 13, 1399-1401.
33. REICHARDT, W. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 303-317). New York: Wiley.
34. SMITH, A. T. (1994). Correspondence-based and energy-based detection of second-order motion in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 1940-1948.
35. SMITH, A. T., HESS, R. F., & BAKER, C. L. (1994). Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 506-514.
36. SOLOMON, J. A., & SPERLING, G. (1994). Full-wave and half-wave rectification in second-order motion perception. Vision Research, 34, 2239-2257.
37. SOLOMON, J. A., & SPERLING, G. (1995). 1st-and 2nd-order motion and texture resolution in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 35, 59-64.
38. SPERLING, G. (1976). Movement perception in computer-driven visual displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8, 144-151.
39. SPERLING, G., & LU, Z.-L. (1996). Second-order reversed-phi reveals two mechanisms: Second-order motion energy and third-order feature salience. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37(ARVO Suppl.), S900.
40. TURANO, K., & PANTLE, A. (1989). On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast variations: Velocity discrimination. Vision Research, 29, 207-221.
41. VAN SANTEN, J. P. H., & SPERLING, G. (1984). Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 451-473.
42. VAN SANTEN, J. P. H., & SPERLING, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 300-321.
43. VICTOR, J. D., & CONTE, M. M. (1990). Motion mechanisms have only limited access to form information. Vision Research. 30, 289-301.
44. WATSON, A. B., & AHUMADA, A. J., JR. (1983). A look at motion in the frequency domain. In J. K. Tsotsos (Ed.), Motion: Perception and representation (pp. 1-10). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. (Also published as NASA Technical Memorandum 84352).
45. WATSON, A. B., AHUMADA, A. J., JR., & FARRELL, J. E. (1986). Window of visibility: A psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3, 300-307.
46. WERKHOVEN, P., SPERLING, G., & CHUBB, C. (1993). The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: A single channel theory. Vision Research, 33, 463-485.
47. WERKHOVEN, P., SPERLING, G., & CHUBB, C. (1994). Perception of apparent motion between dissimilar gratings: Spatiotemporal properties. Vision Research, 34, 2741-2759.
48. WERTHEIMER, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161-265.
49. WEYMOUTH, F. W. (1958). Visual sensory units and the minimum angle of resolution. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 46, 102-113.
50. ZHOU, Y. X., & BAKER, C. L., JR. (1993). A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. Science, 261, 98-101.