Rough sets theory as a pattern classification tool for quality assessment of edible beans

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1145-1152

  Chtioui, Y ^a   Panigrahi, S ^a   Backer, L F ^a  

^a North Dakota State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bean; Classification; Computer vision; Discriminant analysis; Image analysis; Pattern recognition; Quality assessment; Rough sets

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM);

EID: 0033169163     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ballard, D., and C. Brown. 1982. Computer Vision. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
2. Chmielewski, M. R., and J. W. Grzymala-Busse. 1994. Global discretization of continuous attributes as preprocessing for machine learning. In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing, 294-301. San Jose, Calif.: San Jose State University.
3. Chtioui, Y., D. Bertrand, and D. Barba. 1996. Reduction of the size of the learning data in a probabilistic neural network by hierarchical clustering. Application to the discrimination of seeds by artificial vision. Chemometrics & Intelligent Lab. Systems 35: 175-186.
4. Chtioui, Y., D. Bertrand, D. Barba, and Y. Dattee. 1997. Fuzzy c-means clustering for seed discrimination by artificial vision. Chemometrics & Intelligent Lab. Systems 38: 75-87.
5. Chtioui, Y, D. Bertrand, and D. Barba. 1998a. Feature selection by a genetic algorithm. Application to seed discrimination by artificial vision. J. Sei. Food & Agriculture 76(1): 77-86.
6. Chtioui, Y, S. Panigrahi, and R. Marsh. 1998b. Conjugate gradient and approximate Newton methods for an optimal probabilistic neural network for food color classification. J. Optical Engng. 37(11): 3015-3023.
7. Czyzewski, A., and A. Kaczmarek. 1994. Speech recognition system based on rough sets and neural networks. ICS Res. Report 30. Warsaw, Poland: University of Technology.
8. Dayhoff, J. E., and O. Omidvar. 1997. Neural Networks and Pattern Recognition. Calif.: Academic Press.
9. Devijver, P. A., and J. Kittler. 1982. Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach. London, U.K.: Prentice-Hall.
10. Ghazanfari, A., J. Irudayaraj, and A Kusalik. 1996. Grading pistachio nuts using a neural network approach. Transactions of theASAE 39(6): 2319-2324.
11. Kontkanen, P., P. Myllymäki, T. Silander, H. Tirri, and P. Grünwald. 1997. Comparing predictive inference methods for discrete domains. In Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 311-318, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. New Jersey: Soc. for Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
12. Moriyama, H., and K. Shimizu. 1996. On-line optimization of culture temperature for ethanol fermentation using a genetic algorithm. J. Cliem. Teclmol. & Biotechnol. 66(3): 217-222.
13. Panigrahi, S. 1997. Color processing for quality evaluation of edible beans. In Proc. Int. Conf. Imaging Science, Systems and Technology (CISST'97), 178-183, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 June-3 July. CSREA Press.
14. Panigrahi, S., and R. Marsh. 1996. Neural network techniques for color classification of French fries. AS AE Paper No. 96-3004. St. Joseph. Mich.: ASAE.
15. Pawlak, Z. 1982. Rough sets. Int. J. Computer & Info. Sei. 11: 341-356.
16. Pfahringer, B. 1995. Compression-based discretization of continuous attributes. In Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Machine Learning. Tahoe City, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Pitas, I. 1993. Digital Image Processing Algorithms. London, U.K.: Prentice-Hall.
18. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. 1992. 2nd Ed. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
19. Tsumoto, S., and H. Tanaka. 1996. Induction of disease description based on rough sets. First Online Workshop on Sofi Computing 19-30. Nagoya, Japan: Nagoya University.
20. USDA. 1988. Bean Inspection Handbook. Washington D.C.: Federal Grain Inspection Service.
21. Vallejo-Cordoba, B., and S. Nakai. 1994. Keeping-quality assessment of pasteurized milk by multivariate analysis of dynamic headspace gas Chromatographie data. 2. Flavor classification by linear discriminant analysis. J. Agriculture & Food Chem. 42(4): 994-999.
22. Yao, Y, Y. Wang, and R. Shen. 1995. Fuzzy clustering analysis for grape varieties of fresh fruit. Acta Horticulturae 403:219-232.