Acoustic rhinometry: A study of transient and continuous noise techniques with nasal models

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 323-329

  Djupesland, Per G ^a   Qian, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ACOUSTICS; ANALOG DIGITAL CONVERTER; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; NOSE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND;

ACOUSTICS; ANALOG-DIGITAL CONVERSION; ARTIFACTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NOSE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND;

EID: 0033158889     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/105065899782102818     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cole P, Roithmann R, Roth Y, Chapnik J. Measurement of airway patency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 106:1-23, 1997.
2. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: Evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66:295-303, 1989.
3. Djupesland PG, Lyholm B. Nasal airway dimensions in term neonates measured by continuous wide-band noise acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 117:424-432, 1997.
4. Tomkinson A. Acoustic rhinometry: Its place in rhinology (Editorial). Clin Otolaryngol 22:189-191, 1997.
5. Sondhi MM, Gopinath B. Determination of vocal-tract shape from impulse response at the lips. J Acoust Soc Am 36:1867-1873, 1970.
6. Hilberg O, Lyholm B, Michelsen A, et al. Acoustic reflections during rhinometry: Spatial resolution and sound loss. J Appl Physiol 84:1030-1039, 1998.
7. Djupesland PG, Lyholm B. Technical abilities and limitations of a new rhinometric probe optimised for infants. Rhinology 36: 104-113, 1998.
8. Hilberg O, Jensen FT, Pedersen OF. Nasal airway geometry: Comparison between acoustic reflections and magnetic resonans scanning. J Appl Physiol 75:2811-2819, 1993.
9. Fredberg JJ, Wohl ME, Glass GM, Dorkin HL. Airway area by acoustic reflections measured at the mouth. J Appl Physiol 48:749-758, 1980.
10. Marchall I. Impedance reconstruction methods for pulse reflectrometry. Acustica 76:118-128, 1992.
11. Jackson AC, Butler J, Millet EJ, et al. Airway geometry by analysis of acoustic pulse response measurements. J Appl Physiol 43:523-536, 1977.
12. Gilain L, Coste A, Ricolfi F, et al. Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:401-405, 1997.
13. Corey J, Gungor A, Nelson R, et al. A comparison of nasal cross-sectional area and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinomtry and MRI. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:349-354, 1997.
14. Roth Y, Furlott H, Cooost C, et al. A head and tube stabilizing apparatus for acoustic rhinometry measurements. Am J Rhinol 10:83-86, 1996.
15. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 105:275-281, 1995.