Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 401-405

  Gilain, Laurent ^a   Coste, André ^b   Ricolfi, Fréderic ^b   Dahan, Estelle ^b   Marliac, Dominique ^b   Peynegre, Roger ^b   Harf, Alain ^b   Louis, Bruno ^b  

^a SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^b HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TYMAZOLINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; RHINOMETRY;

EID: 0030929839     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040037006     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66: 295-303.
2. Fisher EW, Scadding GK, Lund VJ. The role of acoustic rhinometry in studying the nasal cycle. Rhinology. 1993;31:57-61.
3. Fouke JM, Jackson A. Acoustic rhinometry: effects of decongestants and posture on nasal patency. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;19:371-376.
4. Hilberg O. Grymer LF, Pedersen O. Nasal histamine challenge in nonallergic subjects evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Allergy. 1995;50:166-173.
5. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Elbrond O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations, before and after septoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:1180-1187.
6. Marais J, Murray JAM, Marshall I, Douglas N, Martin S. Minimal cross-sectional areas, nasal peak flow and patients' satisfaction in septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy. Rhinology. 1994;32:145-147.
7. Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normal controls. Rhinology. 1990; 8:5-16.
8. Kunkel MH, Hochban W. Acoustic rhinometry: rationale and perspectives. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1994;22:244-249.
9. Cole P. Rhinomanometry: practice and trends. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:311-315.
10. Tomkinson A, Eccles R. Errors in cross-sectional area estimation by acoustic rhinometry produced by breathing during measurement. Rhinology. 1995;33: 138-140.
11. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnick J, Shpirer I, Hoffstein V, Zamel N. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope. 1995;105: 275-281.
12. Elbrond O, Felding JU, Gustavsen KM. Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to monitor the effect of intramuscular injection of steroid in the treatment of nasal polyps. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:178-180.
13. Min YG, Jang YJ. Measurements of cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry and CT-scanning, Laryngoscope. 1995;105:757-759.
14. Louis B, Glass GM, Fredberg JJ. Airway area by acoustic method: the two-microphone method. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:278-285.
15. Fisher EW, Morris DP, Biemans MA, Palmer CR, Lund VJ. Practical aspects of acoustic rhinometry: problems and solutions. Rhinology. 1995;33:219-223.
16. Hilberg O, Pedersen O. Acoustic rhinometry: influence of paranasal sinuses. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80:1589-1594.