The correlation of laboratory performance in proficiency testing with other QA characteristics

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 280-291

  King, B ^a   Boley, N ^a   Kannan, G ^a  

^a LGC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accreditation; Analytical measurements; Proficiency testing; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033153816     PISSN: 09491775     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007690050369     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. (1996), The managers guide to VAM. Aspen Business Communications, London
2. CITAC Guide 1 (1995) International guide to quality in analytical chemistry: an aid to accreditation. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, Teddigton, UK
3. Holcombe D (1997) Anal Eur 4:12-17
4. Rayner P, Porter LJ (1991) Int J Qual Reliab Manage 8:16-28
5. King B (1995) Quality in the analytical laboratory. In: Parkany M (ed) Quality assurance and TQM for analytical laboratories. Royal Society of Chemistry, London pp 8-18
6. Lawn R (1994) An overview of the VAM 9 survey work and its principal findings. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, Teddington, UK
7. Lawn R, Thompson M, Walker RF (1997) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry
8. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1993) Analyst 118:1495-1500
9. Fleming J (1995) VAM Bulletin 13:6-9
10. Squirrell A (1997) Presentation given at the CITAC International Symposium on Chemical Measurement: world-wide inter-laboratory comparisons, held at Pittcon 97, Atlanta, Ga., USA
11. IUPAC/ISO/AOAC International Report (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:649-666
12. Wood R, Thompson M (1996) J Accred Quality Assur 1:49-56
13. Wilsonand RG, McQuaker NR (1997) Can Chem News 30-31
14. Shahangian S (1998) Arch Pathol Lab Med 122:15-30