Absence of a vestigial vapor pressure paradox

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 7018-7024

  Nagle, John F ^a   Katsaras, John ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIPID BILAYER;

BIOPHYSICS; CHEMISTRY; LIPID BILAYER; NEUTRON; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRESSURE; RADIATION SCATTERING; THERMODYNAMICS; X RAY;

BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; LIPID BILAYERS; NEUTRONS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRESSURE; SCATTERING, RADIATION; THERMODYNAMICS; X-RAYS;

EID: 0033151158     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.7018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R.P. Rand and V.A. Parsegian, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 988, 351 (1989). We have been informed that the name, vapor pressure paradox, was first suggested by Sol M. Gruner.
2. G.S. Smith, C.R. Safinya, D. Roux, and N.A. Clark, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 144, 235 (1987).
3. J. Katsaras, S.-C. Yang, and R.M. Epand, Biophys. J. 63, 1170 (1992).
4. S. Tristram-Nagle, R. Zhang, R.M. Suter, C.R. Worthington, W.-J. Sun, and J.F. Nagle, Biophys. J. 64, 1097 (1993).
5. R. Podgornik and V.A. Parsegian, Biophys. J. 72, 942 (1997).
6. V.A. Parsegian and R. Podgornik, Colloids Surf. A 129-130, 345 (1997).
7. W. Helfrich, Z. Naturforsch. A 33, 305 (1978).
8. T.J. McIntosh and S.A. Simon, Biochemistry 32, 8374 (1993).
9. A. Caille, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. B 174, 891 (1972).
10. R. Zhang, R.M. Suter, and J.F. Nagle, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7014 (1994).
11. R. Holyst, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3692 (1991).
12. J. Als-Nielsen, J.D. Litster, R.J. Birgeneau, M. Kaplan, C.R. Safinya, A. Lindegaard-Anderson, and S. Mathiesen, Phys. Rev. B 22, 312 (1980).
13. R. Zhang, S. Tristram-Nagle, W. Sun, R.L. Headrick, R.C. Irving, R.M. Suter, and J.F. Nagle, Biophys. J. 70, 349 (1996).
14. S. Tristram-Nagle, H.I. Petrache, R.M. Suter, and J.F. Nagle, Biophys. J. 74, 1421 (1998).
15. J. Katsaras, Biophys. J. 73, 2924 (1997).
16. J. Katsaras, Biophys. J. 75, 2157 (1998).
17. N. Gouliaev and J.F. Nagle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2610 (1998).
18. If the surface tension were zero, then no theory would predict a VPP for free standing films.
19. H.I. Petrache, N. Gouliaev, S. Tristram-Nagle, R. Zhang, R.M. Suter, and J.F. Nagle, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7014 (1998).
20. J.F. Nagle, R. Zhang, S. Tristram-Nagle, W. Sun, H.I. Petrache, and R.M. Suter, Biophys. J. 70, 1419 (1996).
21. S. Leibler and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7004 (1987).
22. D. Sornette and N. Ostrowsky, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4062 (1986). We obtain a factor of 2 smaller than their Eq. (15) (which also needs another pair of parentheses).
23. T.J. McIntosh and S.A. Simon, Biochemistry 25, 4058 (1986).
24. H.I. Petrache, S. Tristram-Nagle, and J.F. Nagle, Chem. Phys. Lipids 95, 83 (1998).
25. S. Tristram-Nagle, H.I. Petrache, and J.F. Nagle, Biophys. J. 75, 917 (1998).