5 A Day for low-income families: Evaluation of an advertising campaign and cooking events

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 161-169

  Weaver, Marcia ^a,b,c   Poehlitz, Meredith ^b   Hutchison, Shirley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PUBLIC HEALTH SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033131560     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3182(99)70423-1     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000. National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. DHHS publication PHS 91-50212. Washington, DC, 1991.
2. Popkin BM, Siega-Riz AM. A comparison of dietary trends among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States. N Engl J Med 1996;335:716-20.
3. Krebs-Smith SM, Cook A, Subar AF, Cleveland L, Friday J. US adults' fruit and vegetable intakes, 1989 to 1991: a revised baseline for the Healthy People 2000 objective. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1623-9.
4. Patterson BH, Block G. Food choices and the cancer guidelines. Am J Public Health 1988;78:282-6.
5. Contento I, Balch GI, Bronner YL, et al. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs, and research: a review of research. Chapter 5: nutrition education for adults. J Nutr Educ 1995;25:312-28.
6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Communications. Selecting and profiling the core target audience for the 5 A Day media campaign. Unpublished manuscript, March 1993.
7. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1982;10:276-88.
8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Community nutrition education cooperative agreements. RFA FNS-94-014CDW. Alexandria, VA: 1994.
9. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1997. 117th ed. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1997.
10. Chipman H, Kendall PA. Twenty years of EFNEP: changes and challenges. J Nutr Educ 1989;21:265-9.
11. Owen AL, Owen GM. Twenty years of WIC: a review of some of the effects of the program. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97:777-82.
12. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 (Washington State) [Machine Readable Data Files]/prepared by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC, 1991.
13. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Sons, 1966.
14. Que Software. Rightwriter, Version 6.0 for Windows. Prentice Hall, 1992.
15. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Communications. 5 A Day for Better Health messages: reaching and educating the American public: a tracking study. Unpublished manuscript, October 1992.
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 1994 Behavioral Risk Factor Questionnaire.
17. Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, et al. Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiology 1993;4:455-63.
18. Field A, Colditz G, Fox MK, et al. Comparison of 4 questions for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1216-8.
19. Borenstein M, Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis Program: a computer program. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1988.
20. Seattle Nutrition Action Consortium.Taste and Health: making nutrition education fun. CNEC Demonstration Project final report submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, October 1996.
21. Havas S, Damron D.Trieman K, et al. The Maryland WIC 5 A Day Promotion Pilot Study: rationale, results, and lessons learned. J Nutr Educ 1997;29:343-50.
22. Reicks M, Randall JL, Haynes BJ. Factors affecting consumption of fruits and vegetables by low-income families. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:1309-11.
23. Trieman K, Freimuth V, Damron D, et al. Attitudes and behaviors related to fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the WIC program. J Nutr Educ 1996;28:149-56.