Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: Influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour

British Poultry Science

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 165-176

  Carmichael, N L ^b   Walker, A W ^a   Hughes, B O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b ADAS BOXWORTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; GROOMING; MOTOR ACTIVITY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; FEMALE; GROOMING; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OVIPOSITION;

EID: 0033126858     PISSN: 00071668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00071669987566     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ADAMS, A.W. & CRAIG, J.V. (1985) Effects of crowding and cage shape on production and profitability of caged layers: a survey. Poultry Science, 64: 238-242.
2. APPLEBY, M.C., MAGUIRE, S.N. & MCCRAE, H.E. (1985) Movement by domestic fowl in commercial flocks. Poultry Science, 64: 48-50.
3. APPLEBY, M.C., HOGARTH, G., ANDERSON, J.A., HUGHES, B.O. & WHITTEMORE, C.T. (1988) Performance of a deep litter system for egg production. British Poultry Science, 29: 735-751.
4. APPLEBY, M.C., HUGHES, B.O. & HOGARTH, G. (1989) Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. British Poultry Science, 30: 545-553.
5. APPLEBY, M.C., HUGHES, B.O. & ELSON, H.A. (1992) Poultry Production Systems. Behaviour Management and Welfare. C.A.B. International, Wallingford.
6. BUBIER, N.E. (1994) Final Report on research project on cannibalism in laying hens; A joint project between Oxford University and MAFF, Gleadthorpe (ADAS) Experimental Farm, Meden Vale, Nottinghamshire.
7. CRAIG, J.V. & GUHL, A.M. (1969) Territorial behaviour and social interactions of birds kept in large flocks. Poultry Science, 48: 1622-1628.
8. DAWKINS, M.S. (1989) Time budgets in Red Jungle Fowl as a basis for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 24: 77-80.
9. DAWKINS, M.S. & HARDIE, S. (1989) Space needs of laying hens. British Poultry Science, 30: 413-416.
10. FAWC (1991) Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens in Colony Systems Tolworth, Farm Animal Welfare Council.
11. FUJITA, H. (1973) Quantitative studies on the variations in feeding activity of chickens. II. Effect of the physical form of the feed on the feeding activity of laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science, 10: 47-54.
12. FREEDOM FOODS (1996) Freedom Food. The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Laying Hens. Lewes, Sussex, Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
13. GENSTAT (1993) Procedure Library Manual Release 3(1). Rothamsted Experimental Station Lawes Agricultural Trust.
14. GIBSON, S.W., DUN, P. & HUGHES, B.O. (1986) The performance and behaviour of laying fowls in a covered strawyard system 1983-1986. The Scottish Agricultural Colleges Research and Development Note No 35.
15. GIBSON, S.W., DUN, P. & HUGHES, B.O. (1988) The performance and behaviour of laying fowls in a covered strawyard system. Research and Development in Agriculture, 5: 153-163.
16. HANSEN, I. (1994) Behavioural expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages: frequencies, time budgets and facility utilisation. British Poultry Science, 35: 491-508.
17. HEARN, P.J. (1976) A comparison of troughs, nipples and cup drinkers for laying hens in cages. Gleadthorpe Experimental Husbandry Farm Poultry Booklet, pp. 94-98.
18. HUGHES, B.O. (1975) The concept of an optimal stocking density and its selection for egg production, In: BOORMAN, K.N. & FREEMAN, B. M. (Eds) Economic Factor's affecting Egg Production, pp. 271-298 (Edinburgh, British Foultry Science Ltd.).
19. HUGHES, B.O., WOOD-GUSH, D.G.M. & MORLEY JONES, R. (1974) Spatial organization in flocks of domestic folws. Animal Behaviour, 22: 438-445.
20. HUGHES, B.O., CARMICHAEL, N.L., WALKER, A.W. & GRIGOR, P.N. (1997) Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, in press.
21. MCBRIDGE, G. & FOENANDER, F. (1962) Territorial behaviour in flocks of domestic fowl. Nature, London, 194: 102.
22. MCLEAN, K.A., BAXTER, M.R. & MICHIE, W. (1986) A comparison of the welfare of laying hens in battery cages and in 3 alternative systems. Research and Development in Agriculture, 3: 93-98.
23. MAFF (1987) Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock-Domestic Fowls. Alnwick, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
24. MINITAB (1994). Minitab Release 10.2. Minitab Inc. Pennsylvania, State College.
25. NICOL, C. (1987) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour, 35: 1709-1719.
26. SAVORY, C.J. (1979) Feeding Behaviour, In: BOORMAN, K.N. & FREEMAN, B.M. (Eds) Food Intake Regulation in Poultry pp. 277-323 (Edinburgh, British Foultry Science)
27. SCOTT, G.B. & PARKER, C.A.L. (1994) The ability of laying hens to negotiate horizontal perches. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 42: 121-127.
28. VESTERGAARD, K. (1982) Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl - diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology, 8: 487-495.
29. WALKER, A.W. (1997) Effect of stocking density on the incidence of damaging pecking in alternative systems. 1. Production. Unpublished Report. ADAS Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Notts, UK.
30. WELLS, R.G. (1972) The effect of varying stocking density on the development and subsequent rearing performance of floor-reared pullets. British Poultry Science, 13: 13-25.
31. WOOD-GUSH, D.G.M., DUNCAN, I.J.H. & SAVORY, C.J. (1978) Observations on the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Biology of Behaviour, 3: 193-205.