Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 137-140

  Cavalcanti, M G P ^a,b,e   Yang, J ^c   Ruprecht, A ^b,d   Vannier, M W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Dental implantation; Image processing; Tomography; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0033121954     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600426     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 381-385.
2. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1243-1249.
3. Shimura M, Babbush CA, Majima H, Yanagisawa SW, Sairenji E. Pre-surgical evaluation for dental implants using a reformatting program of computed tomography: maxilla/mandible shape pattern analysis (MSPA). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 175-181.
4. Rothman SL, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML, Schwarz MS. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Radiology 1988; 168: 171-175.
5. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 467-473.
6. Fredholm U, Bolin A, Anderson L. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique. Swed Dent J 1993; 17: 103-109.
7. Quirynen M, Lamoral Y, Dekeyser C, et al. CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1990; 5: 384-389.
8. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1987; 2: 143-148.
9. James RA, Lozada JL, Truitt HP. Computer tomography (CT) application in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 1991; 17: 10-15.
10. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994; 5: 229-238.
11. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with a single breath hold technique. Continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990; 176: 181-183.
12. Vock P, Soucek M, Daepp M, Kallender WA. Lung spiral volumetric CT with single breath hold technique. Radiology 1990; 176: 864-867.
13. Steenbeek JCM. Principles and applications of volumetric CT. MedicaMundi 1993; 38: 20-29.
14. Fishman EK, Ney DR, Kuhlman JE, Cameron JL, Savender BL. Multidimensional display of spiral CT data: Evaluation of the pancreas. Radiology 1991; 181: 259.
15. Kuhlman JE, Ney DR, Fishman EK. Two- and three-dimensional imaging of the in vivo lung. Combining spiral CT with multiplanar and volumetric rendering techniques. Radiology 1991; 181: 274.
16. van Leeuwen MS, van Waes PFGM, Fernandez MA, Steenbeek JCM. Volumetric CT in clinical practice. MedicaMundi 1993; 35: 57-64.
17. Kao SC, Wang G. Radiologic volumetry on a personal computer with a stereologic method. Acad Radiol 1998; 5: 665-669.
18. Stoler A. Helical CT scanning for CAD/CAM subperiosteal implant construction. J Oral Implantol 1996; 22: 247-257.
19. Lam EW, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 42-46.
20. DelBalso AM, Greiner FG, Licata M. Role of diagnostic imaging in evaluation of the dental implant patient. Radiographics 1991; 14: 699-719.
21. Abrahams JJ. Anatomy of jaws revisited with a dental CT software program. AJNR 1993; 14: 979-990.
22. Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Nidecker A. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 264-267.
23. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33: 555-597.
24. Preda L, Di Maggio EM, Dore R, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 327-331.
25. Cavalcanti MGP, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 329-333.