Structure-based prediction of DNA target sites by regulatory proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 114-131

  Kono, Hidetoshi ^a   Sarai, Akinori ^a  

^a RIKEN TSUKUBA INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding site prediction; Protein DNA recognition; Spatial distribution; Specific binding; Statistical potential

Indexed keywords

REGULATOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DNA BINDING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATOR GENE;

BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; DNA; DNA PRIMERS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HYDROGEN BONDING; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; WATER;

EID: 0033120215     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990401)35:1<114::AID-PROT11>3.0.CO;2-T     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Seeman NC, Rosenberg JM, Rich A. Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976;73:804-808.
2. Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Schueler O, Margalit H. Comprehensive analysis of hydrogen bonds in regulatory protein-DNA complexes: in search of common principles. J Mol Biol 1995;253:370-382.
3. Matthews BW. Protein-DNA interaction. No code for recognition. Nature 1988;335:294-295.
4. Suzuki, M. A framework for the DNA-protein recognition code of the probe helix in transcription factors: the chemical and stereochemical rules. Structure 1994;2:317-326.
5. Choo Y, Klug A. Selection of binding sites for zinc fingers using rationally randomised DNA reveals coded interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:11168-11172.
6. Spolar RS, Record MTJ. Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science 1994;263:777-784.
7. Lefstin JA, Yamamoto KR. Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators. Nature 1998;392:885-888.
8. Dickerson RE, Chiu TK. Helix bending as a factor in protein/DNA recognition. Biopolymers 1997;44:361-403.
9. Olson WK, Gorin AA, Lu XJ, Hock LM, Zhurkin VB. DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein-DNA crystal complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:11163-11168.
10. Nekludova L, Pabo CO. Distinctive DNA conformation with enlarged major groove is found in Zn-finger-DNA and other protein-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:6948-6952.
11. Ogata K, Kanei-Ishii C, Sasaki M, et al. The cavity in the hydrophobic core of Myb DNA-binding domain is reserved for DNA recognition and trans-activation. Nat Struct Biol 1996;2:178-187.
12. Sarai A, Mazur J, Nussinov R, Jernigan RL. Sequence dependence of DNA conformational flexibility. Biochemistry 1989;28:7842-7849.
13. Koudelka GB, Harrison SC, Ptashne M. Effect of non-contacted bases on the affinity of 434 operator for 434 represser and Cro. Nature 1987;326:886-888.
14. Schneider TD, Stormo GD, Gold L. Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol 1986;188:415-431.
15. Berg OG, von Hippel PH. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins - statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. J Mol Biol 1987;193:723-750.
16. Berg OG, von Hippel PH. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. II. The binding specificity of cyclic AMP receptor protein to recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1988;200:709-723.
17. Lustig B, Jernigan RL. Consistencies of individual DNA base-amino acid interactions in structures and sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1995;23:4707-4711.
18. Takeda Y, Sarai A, Rivera VM. Analysis of the sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and operator DNA by systematic base substitution experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:439-443.
19. Sarai A, Takeda Y. λ repressor recognizes the approximately 2-fold symmetric half-operator sequences asymmetrically. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:6513-6517.
20. Tanikawa J, Yasukawa T, Enari M, et al. Recognition of specific DNA sequences by the c-Myb proto-oncogen product: Role of three repeat units in the DNA-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:9320-9324.
21. Deng QL, Ishii S, Sarai A. Binding site analysis of c-Myb: screening of potential binding sites by using the mutation matrix derived from systematic binding affinity measurements. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:766-774.
22. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
23. Sippl M. Calculation of conformational ensembles for potentials of mean force: an approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
24. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective inter-residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
25. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
26. Jones DT, Thornton JM. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:210-216.
27. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256: 623-644.
28. Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D.A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
29. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
30. Ouzounis C, Sander C, Scharf M, Schneider R. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. J Mol Biol 1993;232:805-825.
31. Moodie SL, Mitchell JBO, Thornton JM. Protein recognition of adenylate: an example of a fuzzy recognition template. J Mol Biol 1996;263:486-500.
32. Oobatake M, Ooi T. Hydration and heat stability effects on protein unfolding. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1993;59:237-284.
33. Baker EN, Hubbard RE. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1984;44:97-179.
34. McDonald IK, Thornton JM. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;233:777-793.
35. Ippolito JA, Alexander RS, Christianson DW. Hydrogen bond stereochemistry in protein structure and function. J Mol Biol 1990;215:457-471.
36. Taylor R, Kennard O, Versichel W. Geometry of the N-H ⋯ O=C hydrogen bond. 1. Lone-pair directionality. J Am Chem Soc 1983;105:5761-5766.
37. Gewirth DT, Sigler PB. The basis for half-site specificity explored through a non-cognate steroid receptor-DNA complex. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:386-394.
38. Luisi BF, Xu WX, Otwinowski Z, Freedman LP, Yamamoto KR, Sigler PB. Crystallographic analysis of the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with DNA. Nature 1991;352:497-505.
39. Kuriyan J, Thanos D. Structure of NF-KB transcription factor: a holistic interaction with DNA. Structure 1995;3:135-141.
40. Müller CW, Rey FA, Sodeoka M, Verdine GL, Harrison SC. Structure of the NF-KB p50 homodimer bound to DNA. Nature 1995;373:311-317.
41. Ghosh G, Duyne GV, Ghosh S, Sigler PB. Structure of NF-KB p50 homodimer bound to a KB site. Nature 1995;373:303-310.
42. Chytil M, Verdine GL. The Rel family of eukaryotic transcription factors. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:91-100.
43. Goutte C, Johnson AD. Recognition of a DNA operator by a dimer composed of two different homeodomain proteins. EMBO J 1994; 13:1434-1442.
44. Li T, Stark MR, Johnson AD, Wolberger C. Crystal structure of the MATa1/MATα2 homeodomain heterodimer bound to DNA. Science 1995;270:262-269.
45. Wolberger C, Vershon AK, Liu B, Johnson A, Pabo CO. Crystal structure of a MATα2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 1991;67: 517-528.
46. Erickson EM, Rould MA, Mekludova L, Pabo C. Zif268 protein-DNA complex refined at 1.6 Å: a model system for understanding zinc finger-DNA interactions. Structure 1996;4:1171-1180.
47. Schwabe JWR. The role of water in protein-DNA interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:126-134.
48. Miller AM, MacKay VL, Nasmyth KA. Identification and comparison of two sequence elements that confer cell-type specific transcription in yeast. Nature 1985;314:598-603.
49. Russell DW, Jensen R, Zoller MJ, et al. Structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene and analysis of its upstream regulatory region. Mol Cell Biol 1986;6:4281-4294, 1986.
50. Kim CA, Berg JM. A 2.2 Å resolution crystal structure of a designed zinc finger protein bound to DNA. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:940-945.
51. Desjarlais JR, Berg JM. Length-encoded multiplex binding site determination: application to zinc finger proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:11099-11103.
52. 2 zinc finger peptide is not, in general, responsible for base recognition. J Mol Biol 1995;252:1-5.
53. Suzuki M, Yagi N. DNA recognition code of transcription factors in the helix-turn-helix, probe helix, hormone receptor, and zinc finger families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:12357-12361.
54. Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Margalit H. Quantitative parameters for amino acid-base interaction: implications for prediction of protein-DNA binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:2306-2312.
55. Wilson DS, Guenther B, Desplan CJK. High resolution crystal structure of a paired (Pax) class cooperative homeodomain dimer on DNA. Cell 1995;82:709-719.
56. Wuttke DS, Foster MP, Case DA, Gottesfeld JM, Wright PE. Solution structure of the first three zinc fingers of TFIIIA bound to the cognate DNA sequence: determinants of affinity and sequence specificity. J Mol Biol 1997;273:183-206.
57. Foster MP, Wuttke DS, Radhakrishan I, Case DA, Gottesfeld JM, Wright PE. Domain packing and dynamics in the DNA complex of the N-terminal zinc fingers of TFIIIA. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:605-608.
58. Schultz SC, Shields GC, Steitz TA. Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90°. Science 1991;253:1001-1007.
59. Klemm JD, Rould MA, Aurora R, Herr W, Pabo CO. Crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer site: DNA recognition with tethered DNA-binding modules. Cell 1994;77:21-32.
60. Xu W, Rould MA, Jun S, Desplan C, Pabo CO. Crystal structure of a paired domain-DNA complex at 2.5 Å resolution reveals structural basis for Pax developmental mutations. Cell 1995;80:639-650.
61. 6 binuclear cluster. Genes Dev 1994;8:2504-2512.
62. Schwabe JW, Chapman L, Finch JT, Rhodes D. The crystal structure of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain bound to DNA: how receptors discriminate between their response elements. Cell 1993;75:567-578.