The influence of nutritional state on shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 771-775

  Krause, Jens ^a   Hartmann, Nils ^a   Pritchard, Victoria L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; SCHOOLING BEHAVIOR;

DANIO RERIO;

EID: 0033118187     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barber, I., Huntingford, F. A. & Crompton, D. W. T. 1995. The effect of hunger and cestode parasitism on the shoaling decision of small freshwater fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 47, 524-536.
2. Brown, C. R. 1986. Cliff swallow colonies as information centres. Science, 234, 83-85.
3. Brown, G. E. & Brown, J. A. 1992. Do rainbow trout and atlantic salmon discriminate kin? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 1636-1640.
4. Brown, G. E. & Smith, R. J. F. 1994. Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate natural shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 3051-3061.
5. Chapman, M. R. & Kramer, D. L. 1996. Guarded resources: The effect of intruder number on the tactics and success of defenders and intruders. Animal Behaviour, 52, 83-94.
6. Dugatkin, L. A. & Wilson, D. S. 1992. The prerequisites of strategic behaviour in bluegill sunfish. Animal Behaviour, 44, 223-230.
7. Dugatkin, L. A. & Wilson, D. S. 1993. Fish behaviour, partner choice experiments and cognitive ethology. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 3, 368-372.
8. Griffiths, S. W. & Magurran, A. E. 1997. Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 547-551.
9. van Havre, N. & FitzGerald, G. J. 1988. Shoaling and kin recognition in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Biology and Behaviour, 13, 190-201.
10. Johnsson, J. I., Jönsson, E. & Björnsson, B. Th. 1996. Dominance, nutritional state, and growth hormone levels in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Hormones and Behavior, 30, 12-21.
11. Krause, J. 1993. The influence of hunger on shoal size choice by three-spined sticklebacks, gasterosteus aculeatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 43, 775-780.
12. Krause, J. 1994. The influence of food competition and predation risk on size-assortative shoaling in juvenile chub (Leuciscus cephalus). Ethology, 96, 105-116.
13. Krause, J. & Godin, J.-G. J. 1995. Predator preferences for attacking particular prey group sizes: Consequences for predator hunting success and prey predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 50, 465-473.
14. Krebs, J. R. & Kacelnik, A. 1991. Decision-making. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 105-136. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
15. Landeau, L. & Terborgh, J. W. 1986. Oddity and the 'confusion effect' in predation. Animal Behaviour, 24, 1373-1380.
16. Metcalfe, N. B. & Thomson, B. C. 1995. Fish recognise and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 259, 207-210.
17. Milinski, M. & Heller, R. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Nature, 275, 642-644.
18. Olsén, K. H., Grahn, M., Lohm, J. & Langefors, Å. 1998. MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Animal Behaviour, 56, 319-327.
19. Pitcher, T. J. & Parrish, J. K. 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Behaviour of Teleost Fishes (Ed. by T. J. Pitcher), pp. 363-439. London: Chapman & Hall.
20. Pitcher, T. J., Magurran, A. E. & Winfield, I. 1982. Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10, 149-151.
21. Pulliam, H. R. & Caraco, T. 1984. Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? in: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 122-147. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
22. Ranta, E., Rita, H. & Lindström, K. 1993. Competition versus cooperation: Success of individuals foraging alone and in groups. American Naturalist, 142, 42-58.
23. Ranta, E., Rita, H. & Peuhkuri, N. 1995. Patch exploitation, group foraging, and unequal competitors. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 1-5.
24. Reebs, S. G. & Saulnier, N. 1997. The effect of hunger on shoal choice in golden shiners (pisces: Cyprinidae, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Ethology, 103, 642-652.
25. Ruxton, G. & Glasbey, C. A. 1995. Energetics of group foraging: Analysis of a random-walk model. IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology, 12, 71-81.
26. Theodorakis, C. W. 1989. Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools. Animal Behaviour, 38, 496-502.
27. Valone, T. J. 1993. Patch information and estimation: A cost of group foraging. Oikos, 68, 258-266.
28. Vickery, W. L., Giraldeau, L.-A., Templeton, J. J., Kramer, D. L. & Chapman, C. A. 1991. Producers, scroungers and group foraging. American Naturalist, 137, 847-863.
29. Weatherley, A. H. & Gill, H. S. 1987. The Biology of Fish Growth. London: Academic Press.
30. Werner, E. E. & Gilliam, J. F. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Reviews in Systematics, 15, 319-425.
31. Wieser, W., Forstner, H., Medgyesy, N. & Hinterleitner, S. 1988. To switch or not to switch: Partitioning of energy between growth and activity in larval cyprinids (cyprinidae: Teleostei). Functional Ecology, 2, 499-507.