Spectral acoustic structure of barking in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Sex-, age- and individual related variations;Structure acoustique spectrale de l'aboiement chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus). Influence du sexe, de l'age et differences inter-individuelles

Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Serie III

Volumn 322, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 271-279

  Reby, David ^a   Cargnelutti, Bruno ^a   Joachim, Jean ^a   Aulagnier, Stéphane ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Capreolos capreolus; Deer; Individual vocalizations

Indexed keywords

AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCE; COMMUNICATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PREDICTION; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SIGNAL; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; TERRITORIALITY; UNGULATE; VOCALIZATION;

AGE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DEER; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOREST; MALE; NONHUMAN; POWER SPECTRUM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECTROSCOPY; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALIA; ARTIODACTYLA; CAPREOLUS; CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE; UNGULATA;

EID: 0033117260     PISSN: 07644469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0764-4469(99)80063-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hewison A.J.M., Vincent J.P., Reby D., Social organisation, in: Andersen R., Duncan P., Linnel J. (Eds.), The European Roe Deer. The Biology of Success, Chapter 10, Scandinavian University Press, 1998.
2. Danilkin A., Hewison A.J.M., Behavioural Ecology of Siberian and European Roe Deer (Capreolus Capreolus), Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.
3. Bideau E., Vincent J.P., Quéré J.P., Angibault J.M., Évolution saisonnière de la taille des groupes chez le chevreuil en milieu forestier, Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 37 (1983) 161-169.
4. Bramley P.S., Territoriality and reproductive behaviour of roe deer, J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 11 (1970) 43-70.
5. Reby D., Hewison A.J.M., Cargnelutti B., Angibault J.M., Vincent J.P., Estimating population size of roe deer using vocalizations, J. Wildl. Manage. 62 (1998) 1341-1347.
6. Van Laere G., Boutin J.M., Gaillard J.M., Estimation de l'âge chez le Chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) par l'usure dentaire. Test de fiabilité sur des animaux marqués, Gibier Faune Sauvage 6 (1989) 417-426.
7. Joachim J., Lauga J., Populations et dialectes chez le Pinson, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Série III 319 (1996) 231-239.
8. Reby D., Joachim J., Lauga J., Lek S., Aulagnier S., Individuality in the groans of fallow deer (Dama dama) bucks, J. Zool., Lond. 245 (1998) 79-84.
9. Norusis M.J., SPSS Advanced Statistics 6. 1., SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1994.
10. Sparling D.W., Williams J.D., Multivariate analysis of avian vocalizations, J. Theor. Biol. 74 (1978) 83-107.
11. Snowdon C.T., Cleveland J., French J.A., Response to context- and individual-specific cues in cotton-top tamarin long calls, Anim. Behav. 31 (1983) 92-101.
12. Macedonia J.M., Individuality in a contacty call of the ringtailed lemur (Lemur catta), Am. J. Primatol. 11 (1986) 163-179.
13. Lengagne T., Lauga J., Jouventin P., A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: Inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Série III 320 (1998) 885-891.
14. Mitani J.C., Gros-Louis J., Macedonia J.M., Selection for acoustic individuality within the vocal repetoire of wild chimpanzees, Int. J. Primatol. 17 (1996) 569-583.
15. Morton E.S., Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds, Am. Nat. 109 (1975) 17-34.
16. Hauser M.D., The Evolution of Communication, MIT Press., Cambridge, MA, 1996.
17. Brown C.H., Auditory Localisation and Primate Vocal Behaviour, in: Snowdon C.T., Brown C.H., Petersen M.R. (Eds.), Primate Communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982, pp. 144-164.
18. Wiley R.H., Richard D.G., Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal communication, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3 (1978) 69-74.
19. Hauser M.D., The evolution of nonhuman primate vocalizations: Effects of phylogeny, body weight and motivational state, Am. Nat. 142 (1993) 528-542.
20. Ryan M.J., Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication, in: Fritzsch B., Ryan M.J., Wilsczinski W., Hetherington T.E., Walkowiak W. (Eds.), The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, John Wiley Sons, New York, 1988, pp. 637-678.
21. McComb K.E., Roaring and Reproduction in Red Deer, Cervus Elaphus, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1988.
22. Vankova D., Malek J., Characteristics of the vocalizations of red deer Cervus elaphus hinds and calves, Bioacoustics 7 (1997) 281-289.
23. Tooze Z.J., Harrington F.H., Fentress J.C., Individually distinct vocalizations in timber wolves, Canis lupus, Anim. Behav. 40 (1990) 723-730.
24. Johansson A., Liberg O., Wahlström L.K., Temporal and physical characteristics of scraping and rubbing in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), J. Mammal. 76 (1995) 123-129.
25. Frommolt K.H., Kruchenkova E.P., Russig, H., Individuality of territorial barking in arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, in: Klima F., Hofman R.R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Physiology and Ethology of Wild and Zoo Animals, Z. Säugetierk. Suppl. 2, 1997, pp. 66-70.