A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: Inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins

Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Serie III

Volumn 320, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 885-891

  Lengagne, Thierry ^a   Lauga, Jacques ^b   Jouventin, Pierre ^a  

^a CENTRE D ETUDES BIOLOGIQUES DE CHIZÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Individual recognition; Penguin

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; BIOACOUTSTICS; BIRDS; COMMUNICATION; PENGUIN; RECOGNITION; VOCALIZATION BEHAVIOUR;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FREQUENCY MODULATION; NONHUMAN; PENGUIN; RECOGNITION; SINGING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALIA; AVES; SPHENISCIDAE;

EID: 0030734091     PISSN: 07644469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0764-4469(97)80873-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hutchinson R.E., Stevenson J.G., Thorpe W.H. 1968. The basis for individual recognition by voice in the sandwitch tern (Sterna sandvicensis). Behaviour 32, 150-157
2. Derenne P., Jouventin P., Mougin J.L. 1979. Le chant du Manchot royal (Aptenodytes patagonica) et sa signification évolutive. Le Gerfaut 69, 211-224
3. Jouventin P., Guillotin M., Cornet A. 1979. Le chant du Manchot empereur et sa signification adaptative. Behaviour 70, 231-250
4. Abs M., Jeismann R. 1988. Do courtship songs differ individually in the domestic pigeon Columba livia domestica? Bioacoustics 1, 151-57
5. Balcome J.P., McCracken G.F. 1992. Vocal recognition in Mexican free-tailed bats: do pups recognize mothers? Anim. Behav. 43, 79-87
6. Brooke M.L. 1978. Sexual differences in the voice and individual vocal recognition in the manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus). Anim. Behav. 26, 622-9
7. Gabor D. 1946. Theory of communication. J. Inst. Eng. (London) 93, 429-35
8. Szoke P., Filip M. 1977. The study of intonation structure of bird vocalization: an inadequate application of sound spectrography. Opuscula Zoologica 14, 127-54
9. Jouventin P. 1982. Visual And Vocal Signals In Penguins, Their Evolution And Adaptative Characters. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin
10. Barrat A. 1976. Quelques aspectes de la biologie et de l'écologie du Manchot royal (Aptenodytes patagonicus) des îles Crozet. C.N.F.R.A. 40, 9-52
11. Robisson P. 1993. La reconnaissance individuelle chez deux espèces jumelles, le Manchot empereur (Aptenodytes forsteri) et le Manchot royal (Aptenodytes patagonicus). Thèse d'État, université de Rennes
12. Konishi M. 1969. Time resolution by single auditory neurons in birds. Nature 222, 566-7
13. Dooling R.J. 1980. Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. In: Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates. (Popper A N., Fay R.R., eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 261-88
14. Klump G.M., Maier E.H. 1989. Gap detection in the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 531-8
15. Oppenheim A.V., Schafer R.W. 1989, Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ
16. Stearns S.D., David R.A. 1996. Signal Processing Algorithms In Matlab. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
17. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User guide. Version 6, Volume 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
18. Jouventin P., Roux P. 1979. Le chant du Manchot Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae). Rôle dans la reconnaissance individuelle et comparaison avec le Manchot empereur non territorial. L'oiseau et RFO 49, 31-7
19. Tschantz B. 1968. Trottellumen. Z. Tierpsychol., Suppl. No 4.
20. Cullen E. 1957. Adaptations in the Kittiwake to cliff nesting. Ibis 99, 275-302
21. Stoddard P.K., Beecher M.D., Loesche P., Campbell S.E. 1992. Memory does not constrain individual recognition in a bird with song repertoires. Behaviour 122, 274-87
22. Medvin M.B., Stoddard P.K., Beecher M.D. 1992. Signals for parent-offspring recognition: strong sib-sib call similarity in cliff swallows out not barn swallows. Ethology 90, 17-28
23. Robisson P. 1992. Vocalizations in Aptenodytes penguin: application of the two voice theory. The Auk 109, 654-8
24. Galeotti P., Pavan G. 1991. Individual recognition of male Tawny owls (Strix aluco) using spectrograms of their territorial calls. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3, 113-26
25. Davis W.M.J. 1988. Acoustic communication in the belted kingfisher: an example of temporal coding. Behaviour 107, 1-23
26. Aubin T., Brémond J.C. 1983. The process of soecies-specific song recognition in the skylark Alauda arvensis. An experimental study by means of synthesis. Z. Tierpsychol 61, 141-52
27. Robisson P. 1987. L'adaptation des règles de décodage des signaux acoustiques des oiseaux au canal de transmission. Etude appliquée aux cris de détresse du vanneau huppé Vanellus vanellus. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris. Série III 10, 275-8
28. Brémond J.C. 1972. Recherche sur les paramètres acoustiques assurant la reconnaissance spécifique dans les chants de Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Phylloscopus bonelli et d'un hybride. Le Gerfaut 62, 313-24