Mate choice copying versus preference for actively displaying males by female pied flycatchers

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 679-686

  Slagsvold, Tore ^a   Viljugrein, Hildegunn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; PASSERINE;

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 0033104489     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0996     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Birkhead, T. R., Briskie, J. V., Lifjeld, J. T. & Slagsvold, T. 1997. Breeding cycle patterns of sperm storage in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Auk, 114, 792-796.
3. Briggs, S. E., Godin, J.-G. J. & Dugatkin, L. A. 1996. Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology, 7, 151-157.
4. Brooks, R. 1996. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 323-329.
5. Collins, S. A. 1994. Male display: cause or effect of female preference? Animal Behaviour, 48, 371-375.
6. Dale, S. & Slagsvold, T. 1995. Female contests for nest sites and mates in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ethology, 99, 209-222.
7. Dale, S. & Slagsvold, T. 1996. Mate choice on multiple cues, decision rules and sampling strategies in female pied flycatchers. Behaviour, 133, 903-944.
8. Dale, S., Rinden, H. & Slagsvold, T. 1992. Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 165-176.
9. Drost, R. 1936. Über das Brutkleid männlicher Trauerfliegenfänger, Muscicapa hypoleuca. Vogelzug, 6, 179-186.
10. Dugatkin, L. A. 1992. Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. American Naturalist, 139, 1384-1389.
11. Dugatkin, L. A. & Godin, J.-G. J. 1992. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 249, 179-184.
12. Dugatkin, L. A. & Godin, J.-G. J. 1993. Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 289-292.
13. Dugatkin, L. A. & Höglund, J. 1995. Delayed breeding and the evolution of mate copying in lekking species. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 174, 261-267.
14. Fiske, P., Kålås, J. A. & Sæther, S. A. 1996. Do female great snipe copy each other's mate choice? Animal Behaviour, 51, 1355-1362.
15. Galef, B. G. & White, D. J. 1998. Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 55, 545-552.
16. Gibson, R. M. & Höglund, J. 1992. Copying and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 229-232.
17. Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1991. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165-180.
18. Grant, J. W. A. & Green, L. D. 1996. Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Behavioral Ecology, 7, 165-167.
19. Harvey, P. H. & Bradbury, J. W. 1991. Sexual selection. In: Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach. 3rd edn (Ed. by). R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 203-233. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Höglund, J. & Alatalo, R. V. 1995. Leks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Höglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., Gibson, R. M. & Lundberg, A. 1995. Mate-choice copying in the black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1627-1633.
22. Hovi, M. & Rätti, O. 1994. Mate sampling and assessment procedures in female pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ethology, 96, 127-137.
23. Karlsson, L., Persson, K. & Wallinder, G. 1986. Ageing and sexing in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Vår Fågelvärld, 45, 131-146.
24. Kilpimaa, J., Alatalo, R. V., Rätti, O. & Siikamäki, P. 1995. Do pied flycatcher females guard their monogamous status? Animal Behaviour, 50, 573-578.
25. Krebs, J. R. 1982. Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 185-194.
26. Lafleur, D. L., Lozano, G. A. & Sclafani, M. 1997. Female mate-choice copying in guppies, Poecilia reticulata: a re-evaluation. Animal Behaviour, 54, 579-586.
27. Lampe, H. M. & Sætre, G.-P. 1995. Female pied flycatchers prefer males with larger song repertoires. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 262, 163-167.
28. Lifjeld, J. T., Slagsvold, T., Dale, S. & Ellegren, H. 1997a. A sexually selected paradox in the pied flycatcher: attractive males are cuckolded. Auk, 114, 112-11 5.
29. Lifjeld, J. T., Slagsvold, T. & Ellegren, H. 1997b. Experimental mate switching in pied flycatchers: male copulatory access and fertilization success. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1225-1232.
30. Losey, G. S. J., Stanton, F. G., Telecky, T. M. & Tyler, W. A. III & The Zoology 691 Graduate Seminar Class 1986. Copying others, an evolutionary stable strategy for mate choice: a model. American Naturalist, 128, 653-664.
31. Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R. V. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. London: T. & A. D. Poyser.
32. Nakatsuru, K. & Kramer, D. L. 1982. Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science, 216, 753-755.
33. Petrie, M., Hall, M., Halliday, T., Budgey, H. & Pierpoint, C. 1992. Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 349-358.
34. Pruett-Jones, S. 1992. Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? American Naturalist, 140, 1000-1009.
35. Sætre, G.-P., Dale, S. & Slagsvold, T. 1994. Female pied flycatchers prefer brightly coloured males. Animal Behaviour, 48, 1407-1416.
36. Schlupp, I., Marler, C. & Ryan, M. J. 1994. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science, 263, 373-374.
37. Servedio, M. R. & Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. The evolution of mate choice copying by indirect selection. American Naturalist, 148, 848-867.
38. Slagsvold, T. 1986. Nest site settlement by the pied flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scandinavica, 17, 210-220.
39. Slagsvold, T. & Dale, S. 1994. Why do female pied flycatchers mate with already mated males: deception or restricted mate sampling? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 239-250.
40. Slagsvold, T. & Dale, S. 1996. Disappearance of female pied flycatchers in relation to breeding stage and experimentally induced molt. Ecology, 77, 461-471.
41. Slagsvold, T. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1988a. Plumage colour and sexual selection in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Animal Behaviour, 36, 395-407.
42. Slagsvold, T. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1988b. Pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca prefer dry nest cavities. Fauna norvegica Series C, Cinclus, 11, 67-70.
43. Slagsvold, T. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1994. Polygyny in birds: the role of competition between females for male parental care. American Naturalist, 143, 59-94.
44. Slagsvold, T. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1997. Incomplete female knowledge of male quality may explain variation in extra-pair paternity in birds. Behaviour, 134, 353-371.
45. Slagsvold, T., Amundsen, T., Dale, S. & Lampe, H. 1992. Female-female aggression explains polyterritoriality in male pied fly-catchers. Animal Behaviour, 43, 397-407.
46. Spurrier, M. F., Boyce, M. S. & Manly, B. F. J. 1994. Lek behaviour in captive sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. Animal Behaviour, 47, 303-310.
47. Stöhr, S. 1998. Evolution of mate-choice copying: a dynamic model. Animal Behaviour, 55, 893-903.
48. Wade, M. J. & Pruett-Jones, S. G. 1990. Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 87, 5749-5753.