The evolution of mate choice copying by indirect selection

American Naturalist

Volumn 148, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 848-867

  Servedio, Maria R ^a   Kirkpatrick, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPYING; INDIRECT SELECTION; MATE CHOICE;

EID: 0030303553     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/285959     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
2. Bradbury, J. W., S. L. Verhencamp, and R. M. Gibson. 1985. Leks and the unanimity of female choice. Pages 301-314 in P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey, and M. Slatkin, eds. Essays in honor of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Dugatkin, L. A. 1992. Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. American Naturalist 139:1374-1379.
4. _. 1996. Copying and female mate choice. In G. Galef and C. Hayes, eds. Social learning and imitation: the evolution of culture. Academic Press, New York (in press).
5. Dugatkin, L. A., and J.-G. Godin. 1992. Reversal of female mate choice copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 249:179-184.
6. _. 1993. Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology 4:289-292.
7. Galef, B. G., Jr. 1988. Imitation in animals: history, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. Pages 1-28 in T. R. Zentall and B. G. Galef, Jr., eds. Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
8. Gibson, R. M., and G. C. Bachman. 1992. The costs of female choice in a lekking bird. Behavioral Ecology 3:300-309.
9. Gibson, R. M., and J. Hoglund. 1992. Copying and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7:229-232.
10. Gibson, R. M., J. W. Bradbury, and S. L. Verhencamp. 1991. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behavioral Ecology 2:165-180.
11. Hoglund, J., R. V. Alatalo, and A. Lundberg. 1990. Copying the mate choice of others? observations on female black grouse. Behaviour 114:221-236.
12. Hoglund, J., R. V. Alatalo, R. M. Gibson, and A. Lundberg. 1995. Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Animal Behaviour 49:1627-1633.
13. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
14. _. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:43-70.
15. Kirkpatrick, M., and L. A. Dugatkin. 1994. Sexual selection and the effects of copying mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34:443-450.
16. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature (London) 350:33-38.
17. Laland, K. N. 1994a. On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution 48:477-489.
18. _. 1994b. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theoretical Population Biology 45:1-15.
19. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection and adaptation on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
20. Lill, A. 1974. Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Harten). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 36:1-36.
21. Losey, G. S., Jr., F. G. Stanton, T. M. Telecky, and the Zoology 691 graduate seminar class. 1986. Copying others, an evolutionarily stable strategy for mate choice: a model. American Naturalist 128:653-664.
22. O'Donald, P. 1980. Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa, and S. Nee. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
24. Pruett-Jones, S. 1992. Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? American Naturalist 140:1000-1009.
25. Schlupp, I., C. Marler, and M. Ryan. 1994. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science (Washington, D.C.) 263:373-374.
26. Wade, M. J., and S. G. Pruett-Jones. 1990. Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 87:5749-5753.
27. Wolfram, S. 1991. Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.