Is this tactic ethical? Biased judgments of ethics in negotiation

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-60

  Kronzon, Shirit ^a   Darley, John ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033092569     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/15324839951036551     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. The American Economic Review, 85, 1337-1343.
2. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
3. Brown, J. D. (1990). Evaluating one's abilities: Shortcuts and stumbling blocks on the road to self-knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 149-167.
4. Greenwald, A. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
5. Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.
6. Kramer, R. M., Newton, E., & Pommerenke, P. L. (1993). Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 110-133.
7. Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P. L., & Newton, E. (1993). The social context of negotiation: Effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
8. Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1995, February). A factor analytic study of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics (Working Paper Series WPS 95-9) Columbus: Max M. Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University.
9. Lewicki, R. J., & Stark, N. (1996). What is ethically appropriate in negotiations: An empirical examination of bargaining tactics. Social Justice Research, 9, 69-95.
10. Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1994). Communal and exchange relationships: Controversies and research. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 29-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. O'Connor, K. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-515.
12. Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 457-471.
13. Robertson, D. C., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1995). Decision-making processes on ethical issues: The impact of a social contract perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, 213-240.
14. Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naive realism" in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404-417.
15. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322-336.
16. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
17. Thompson, L. (1995). "They saw a negotiation": Partisanship and involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 839-853.
18. Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 176-197.
19. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.