A Comparison of Cytochromeband DNA Hybridization Data Bearing on the Phylogeny of Swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 320-331

  Sheldon, Frederick H ^a   Whittingham, Linda A ^a   Winkler, David W ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; CYTOCHROME B GROUP; DNA; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SONGBIRDS;

EID: 0033090063     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0570     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Check-list of North American Birds. 1983;American Ornithologists' Union, Lawrence.
2. Auk. 114:1997;542-552.
3. Avise J. C. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. 1994;Chapman & Hall, New York.
4. Avise J. C., Nelson W. S., Sibley C. G. DNA sequence support for a close phylogenetic relationship between some storks and New World vultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;5173-5177.
5. Bledsoe A. H., Raikow R. J. A quantitative assessment of congruence between molecular and nonmolecular estimates of phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 30:1990;247-259.
6. Bledsoe A. H., Sheldon F. H. The metric properties of DNA-DNA hybridization dissimilarity measures. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;93-105.
7. Bledsoe A. H., Sheldon F. H. Molecular homology and DNA hybridization. J. Mol. Evol. 30:1990;425-433.
8. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
9. Bremer K. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics. 6:1990;291-296.
10. Brooks D. R., McLennan D. A. Historical ecology as a research programme: Scope, limitations and the future. Phylogenetics and Ecology. 1994;Academic Press, London. p. 1-27.
11. Brown C. R., Brown M. B. Coloniality in the Cliff Swallow: The Effect of Group Size on Social Behavior. 1996;Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddell P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
13. Caccone A., Powell J. R. DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution. 43:1989;925-942.
14. Cracraft J. DNA hybridization and avian phylogenetics. Evol. Biol. 21:1987;47-96.
15. Cummings M. P., Otto S. P., Wakeley J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;814-822.
16. Cunningham C. W. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:1997a;464-478.
17. Cunningham C. W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997b;733740.
18. Degli Esposti M., De Vries S., Crimi M., Ghelli A., Patarnello T., Meyer A. Mitochondrial cytochromeb. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1143:1993;243-271.
19. Desalle R., Brower A. V. Z. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related HawaiianDrosophila. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;751-764.
20. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;599-634.
21. Edwards S. V. Relevance of microevolutionary processes to higher level molecular systematics. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics. 1997;251-278 Academic Press, New York.
22. Edwards S. V., Arctander P., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 243:1991;99-107.
23. Farris J. S. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:1969;374-385.
24. Farris J. S. Distances and statistics. Cladistics. 2:1986;144-157.
25. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phyogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
26. Felsenstein J. Distance methods: Reply to Farris. Cladistics. 2:1986;130-143.
27. Felsenstein J. Cladistics. 5:1989;164-166.
28. Felsenstein, J. 1995, PHYLIP - Phylogenetic inference package (version 3.5c), Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
29. Goodman M., Tagle D. A., Fitch D. H. A., Bailey W., Czelusniak J., Koop B. F., Benson P., Slightom J. L. Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids. J. Mol. Evol. 30:1990;260-266.
30. Griffiths C. S. Correlation of functional domains and rates of nucleotide substitution in cytochromeb. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:1997;352-365.
31. Hackett S. J. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genusRamphocelus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;368-382.
32. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:1985;160-174.
33. Helm-Bychowski K., Cracraft J. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: Relationships within the corvine assemblage (class Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome-b. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1196-1214.
34. Hillis D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 383:1996;130-131.
35. Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;182-192.
36. Hillis D. M., Larson A., Davis S. K., Zimmer E. A. Nucleic Acids III: Sequencing. Hillis D. M., Moritz C. Molecular Systematics. 1990;318-370 Sinauer, Sunderland.
37. Howell N. Evolutionary conservation of protein regions in the protonmotive cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;157-169.
38. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;128-144.
39. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179.
40. Kluge A. G., Wolf A. J. Cladistics: What's in a word. Cladistics. 9:1993;183-199.
41. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Paabo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:1989;6196-6200.
42. Krajewski C., Dickerman A. W. Bootstrap analysis of phylogenetic trees derived from DNA hybridization distances. Syst. Zool. 39:1990;383-390.
43. Krajewski C., Fetzner J. W. Phylogeny of cranes (Gruiformes: Gruidae) based on cytochrome-b. Auk. 111:1994;351-365.
44. Kumar, S. Tamura, K. Nei, M. 1993, MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, Inst. Mol. Evol. Gen, Penn. State Univ. University Park, PA.
45. Lanyon S. M. Phylogenetic frameworks: Towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49:1993;45-61.
46. Lanyon S. M., Hall J. G. Reexamination of barbet monophyly using mitochondrial-DNA sequence data. Auk. 111:1994;389-397.
47. Li W.-H. Molecular Evolution. 1997;Sinauer, Sunderland.
48. Maddison W. P., Maddison D. R. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. 1992;Sinauer, Sunderland.
49. Mayr E., Bond J. Notes on the generic classification of the swallows, Hirundinidae. Ibis. 85:1943;334-341.
50. Mickevich M. F. Taxonomic congruence. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;143-158.
51. Mindell D. P., Sorenson M. D., Huddleston C. J., Miranda H. C., Knight A., Sawchuck S. J., Yuri T. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics. 1997;213-247 Academic Press, New York.
52. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
53. Møller A. P. Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow. 1994;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
54. Moore W. S., De Filippis V. R. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochromeb. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics. 1997;83-119 Academic Press, New York.
55. Nunn G. B., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of the birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) using mitochondrial gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;445-459.
56. Powell J. R. Monophyly/paraphyly/polyphyly and gene/species trees: An example fromDrosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:1991;892-896.
57. Prager E. M., Wilson A. C. Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme: Analysis of DNA and amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 27:1988;326-335.
58. Sheldon F. H. Advances in the theory and practice of DNA-hybridization as a systematic method. Schierwater B., Streit B., Wagner G. P., DeSalle R. Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. 1994;285-297 Birkhäuser, Basel.
59. Sheldon F. H., Bledsoe A. H. Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;328-343.
60. Sheldon F. H., Bledsoe A. H. Avian molecular systematics, 1970s to 1990s. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;243-278.
61. Sheldon F. H., Gill F. B. A reconsideration of songbird phylogeny, with emphasis on the evolution of titmice and their sylvioid relatives. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;473-495.
62. Sheldon F. H., Whittingham L. A. Phylogeny in studies of bird ecology, behavior, and morphology. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics. 1997;275-295 Academic Press, New York.
63. Sheldon F. H., Winkler D. W. Intergeneric phylogenetic relationships of swallows estimated by DNA-DNA hybridization. Auk. 110:1993;798-824.
64. Sibley C. G., Ahlquist J. E. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. 1990;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
65. Sibley C. G., Monroe B. L. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. 1990;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
66. Slikas B. Phylogeny of the avian family Ciconiidae (storks) based on cytochromeb. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:1997;275-300.
67. Springer M. S., Davidson E. H., Britten R. J. Calculation of sequence divergence from the thermal stability of DNA heteroduplexes. J. Mol. Evol. 34:1992;379-382.
68. Springer M., Krajewski C. DNA hybridization in animal taxonomy: A critique from first principles. Q. Rev. Biol. 64:1989;291-318.
69. Swofford, D. L. PAUP*, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, 4.0d61, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC.
70. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddell P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D. M., Moritz C., Mable B. K. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinauer, Sunderland.
71. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;512-526.
72. Templeton A. R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution. 37:1983;221-244.
73. Turner A. T., Rose C. Swallows and Martins: An Identification Guide and Handbook. 1989;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
74. Winkler D. W., Sheldon F. H. The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;5705-5707.