Supramolecular catalysis of ester and amide cleavage by a dinuclear barium(II) complex

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 348-351

  Cacciapaglia, Roberta ^a   Di Stefano, Stefano ^a   Kelderman, Erik ^a   Mandolini, Luigi ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alkaline earth metals; Enzyme mimetics; Macrocyclic ligands; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

AMIDE; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; ESTER; METAL COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPETITIVE INHIBITION; COMPLEX FORMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DISSOCIATION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; METAL BINDING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 0033083324     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990201)38:3<348::AID-ANIE348>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. a) R. Breslow, Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 146-153;
2. b) Y. Murakami, J. Kikuchi, Y. Hisaeda, O. Hayashida, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 721-758;
3. c) A. J. Kirby, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 770-790; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 707-724;
4. c) A. J. Kirby, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 770-790; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 707-724;
5. d) D. J. Cram, J. M. Cram, Container Molecules and Their Guests, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1994, pp. 65-84.
6. R. Cacciapaglia, L. Mandolini, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 221-231.
7. a) K.D. Karlin, Science 1993, 261, 701-708;
8. b) N. N. Murthy, M. Mahroof-Tahir, K. D. Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10404-10405;
9. c) D. H. Vance, A. W. Czarnik, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12165-12166;
10. d) M. Yashiro, A. Ishikubo, M. Komiyama, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1793-1744;
11. e) M.W. Göbel, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 1201-1203; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1141-1143;
12. e) M.W. Göbel, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 1201-1203; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1141-1143;
13. f) H. Steinhagen, G. Helmchen, Augew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2484-2492; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2339-2342;
14. f) H. Steinhagen, G. Helmchen, Augew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2484-2492; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2339-2342;
15. g) M. Wall, R. C. Hynes, J. Chin. Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1696; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1633-1635;
16. g) M. Wall, R. C. Hynes, J. Chin. Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1696; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1633-1635;
17. h) N. H. Williams, J. Chin, Chem. Commun. 1996, 131-132;
18. i) P. Hurst, B. K. Takasaki, J. Chin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9982-9983;
19. j) W. H. Chapman, Jr., R. Breslow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5462-5469;
20. k) T. Koike, M. Inoue, E. Kimura, M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3091-3099;
21. l) K. G. Ragunathan, H.-J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1314-1316; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1219-1221;
22. l) K. G. Ragunathan, H.-J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1314- 1316; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1219-1221;
23. m) P. Molenveld, S. Kapsabelis, J. F. J. Engbersen, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2948-2949;
24. n) S. Liu, Z. Luo, A. D. Hamilton, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2794-2796; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2678-2680.
25. n) S. Liu, Z. Luo, A. D. Hamilton, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2794-2796; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2678-2680.
26. R. Cacciapaglia, S. Di Stefano, E. Kelderman, L. Mandolini, F. Spadola, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 6476-6479.
27. R. Cacciapaglia, L. Mandolini, V. Van Axel Castelli, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3089-3092.
28. Reactions of 3 and 5 are more sensitive to the presence of the metal ion than the corresponding reactions of 4 and 6 because binding to the barium ion transforms an electron-donating (rate-retarding) carboxylate into an electron-withdrawing (rate-enhancing) carboxylatemetal ion pair.
29. The close similarity of the two values would indicate that the higher affinity for the monometallic complex of the more basic AcO ion is substantially counterbalanced by the statistical factor 2 which operates in the binding of the less basic 3 to the bimetallic complex. The fact that the ligand is not exactly the same in the two cases is presumably unimportant.
30. inter refers to the intermolecular model reaction. For a discussion of structure effects on the EM value see: a) A. J. Kirby, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1980, 17, 183-278; b) L. Mandolini, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1986, 22, 1-111.
31. inter refers to the intermolecular model reaction. For a discussion of structure effects on the EM value see: a) A. J. Kirby, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1980, 17, 183-278; b) L. Mandolini, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1986, 22, 1-111.
32. M. R. Johnson, I. O. Sutherland, R. F. Newton, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 586-600.
33. M. R. Johnson, I. O. Sutherland, R. F. Newton, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 357-371.
34. A. Rosowsky, J. H. Freisheim, H. Bader, R. A. Forsch, S. A. Susten, C. A. Cucchi, F. Frei, J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 660-667.
35. E. J. Bourne, S. H. Henry, C. E. M. Tatlow, J. C. Tatlow, J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 4014-4019.
36. F. D. Chattaway, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 2495-2496.