Flexible structural comparison allowing hinge-bending, swiveling motions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 232-254

  Verbitsky, George ^c   Nussinov, Ruth ^a,b   Wolfson, Haim ^c  

^a SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Computer vision; Detection of conformational changes; Domain motions; Flexible protein structure comparison; Hinge bending motions

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; CALMODULIN; GLYCERALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE; HYDROLASE; LACTOFERRIN; LYASE; LYSOZYME; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PHOSPHOLIPASE A2; REGULATOR PROTEIN; TRANSFERASE; TRANSFERRIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; ROBOTICS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYMES; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EID: 0033081847     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990201)34:2<232::AID-PROT9>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Murthy MRN. A fast method of comparing protein structures. FEBS Lett 1984;168:151-166.
2. Matthews BW, Rossman MG. Meth Enzymol 1985;115:397-420.
3. Abagyan RA, Maiorov VN. A simple qualitative representation of polypeptide chain folds: Comparison of protein tertiary structures. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1988;5:1267-1279.
4. Richards FM, Kundrot CE. Identification of structural motifs from protein coordinate data: Secondary structure and first-level super-secondary structure. Proteins 1988;3:71-81.
5. Zuker M, Somorjai RL. The alignment of protein structures in three dimensions. Bull Math Biol 1989;51:55-78.
6. Taylor WR, Orengo CA. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 1989;208:1-22.
7. Sali TL, Blundell A. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures, a procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J Mol Biol 1990;212:403-428.
8. Mitchell EM, Artymiuk PJ, Rice DW, Willet P. Techniques derived from graph theory to compare secondary structure motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;212:151-166.
9. Vriend G, Sander C. Detection of common three-dimensional substructures in proteins. Proteins 1991;11:52-58.
10. Alexandrove NN, Takahashi K, Go N. Common spatial arrangements of backbone fragments in homologous and non-homologous proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;225:5-9.
11. Koch I, Kaden F, Selbig J. Analysis of protein sheet topologies by graph theoretical methods. Proteins 1992;12:314-323.
12. Grindley HM, Artymiuk PJ, Rice W, Willett P. Identification of tertiary structure resemblance in proteins using a maximal common subgraph isomorphism algorithm. J Mol Biol 1993;229: 707-721.
13. Artymiuk PJ, Poirrette AR, Grindley HM, Rice DW, Willet P. A graph-theoretic approach to the identification of three-dimensional patterns of amino acid side-chains in protein structures. J Mol Biol 1994;243:327-344.
14. Fischer D, Wolfson H, Lin SL, Nussinov R. Three-dimensional, sequence order-independent structural comparison of a serine protease against the crystallographic database reveals active site similarities: Potential implications to evolution and to protein folding. Protein Sci 1994;3:769-778.
15. Tsai C-J, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with a sequence-order-independent comparison technique. J Mol Biol 1996;260:604-620.
16. Alesker V, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Detection of non-topological motifs in protein structures. Protein Eng 1996;9:1103-1119.
17. Faber HR, Matthews BW. A mutant T4 lysozyme displays five different crystal conformations. Nature 1990;348:263-266.
18. Dixon MM, Nicholson H, Shewchuk L, Baase WA, Matthews BW. Structure of a Hinge-Bending Bacteriophage T4 Lysozyme Mutant, Ile3Pro. J Mol Biol 1992;227:917-933.
19. Gerstein M, Lesk AM, Chothia C. Structural mechanism for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 1994;33:6739-6749.
20. Bennett MJ, Choe S, Eisenberg D. Domain swapping: Entangling alliances between proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:3127-3131.
21. Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Efficient detection of motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:10495-10499.
22. Wolfson HJ. Generalizing the generalized Hough transform. Pattern Recog Lett 1991;12:565-573.
23. Ballard DH. Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recognition 1981;13:111-122.
24. Lamdan Y, Wolfson HJ. Geometric hashing: A general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. In: Bajcy, Ullman, editors. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1988. p 238-249.
25. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, et al. The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
26. Sandak B, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. An Automated Computer Vision and Robotics-Based Technique. Comput Appl Biosci (CA-BIOS) 1995;11:87-99.
27. Sandak B, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins 1998;32:159-174.
28. Wriggers W, Schulten K. Protein domain movements: Detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates. Proteins 1997;29:1-14.
29. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL. Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990. 1028 p.
30. Bachar O, Fischer D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. A computer vision based technique for 3-D sequence independent structural comparison of proteins. Protein Eng 1993;6:279-288.
31. Ikura M, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Zhu G, Klee CB, Bax A. Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR. Science 1992;256:632-644.