Evolution of RuminantSarcocystis(Sporozoa) Parasites Based on Small Subunit rDNA Sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 27-37

  Holmdahl, O J M ^a   Morrison, David A ^a   Ellis, John T ^a   Huong, Lam T T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NONG LAM UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME DNA; RIBOSOME RNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SARCOCYSTIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SARCOCYSTIS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0033071637     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0556     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barta J. R., Jenkins M. C., Danforth H. D. Evolutionary relationships of avianEimeria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:1991;345-355.
2. De Rijk P., De Wachter R. DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary structure research. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 9:1993;735-740.
3. Dubey J. P., Speer C. A., Fayer R. Sarcocystosis of Animals and Man. 1989;CRC Press, Boca Raton.
4. Ellis J., Luton K., Baverstock P. R., Brindley P. J., Nimmo K. A., Johnson A. M. The phylogeny ofNeospora caninum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 64:1994;303-311.
5. Ellis J., Morrison D. Effects of sequence alignment on the phylogeny ofSarcocystis. Parasitol. Res. 81:1995;696-699.
6. Ellis J. T., Morrison D. A., Jeffries A. C. The phylum Apicomplexa: An update on the molecular phylogeny. Evolutionary Relationships among Protozoa. 1998;Chapman & Hall, London.
7. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1995, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), University of Washington, Seattle.
9. Gajadhar A. A., Marquardt W. C., Hall R., Gunderson J., Ariztia-Camona E. V., Sogin M. L. Ribosomal RNA sequences ofSarcocystis muris, Theileria annulataCrypthecodinium cohnii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 45:1991;147-154.
10. Gutell R. R. Comparative sequence analysis and the structure of 16S and 23S rRNA. Zimmermann R. A., Dahlberg A. E. Ribosomal RNA. 1996;111-128 CRC Press, Boca Raton.
11. Gutell R. R., Larsen N., Woese C. R. Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol. Rev. 58:1994;10-26.
12. Gutell R. R., Weiser B., Woese C. R., Noller H. F. Comparative anatomy of 16S-like ribosomal RNA. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 32:1985;155-216.
13. Hickson R. E., Simon C., Cooper A., Spicer G. S., Sullivan J., Penny D. Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;150-169.
14. Holmdahl O. J. M., Mattsson J., Uggla A., Johansson K. E. The phylogeny ofNeospora caninumToxoplasma gondii. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994:1991;187-192.
15. Holmdahl O. J. M., Mattsson J. G., Uggla A., Johansson K.-E. Oligonucleotide probes complementary to variable regions of 18S rRNA fromSarcocystis. Mol. Cell. Probes. 7:1993;481-486.
16. Huong L. T. T., Dubey J. P., Nikkilä T., Uggla A. Sarcocystis buffalonisBubalus bubalis. J. Parasitol. 83:1997;471-474.
17. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179.
18. Kjer K. M. Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: An example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1995;314-330.
19. Levine N. D. Phylum II. Apicomplexa Levine 1970. Lee J. J., Hunter S. H., Bovee E. C. An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. 1985;322-374 Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence.
20. Lyons-Weiler, J. 1997, Manual for RASA 2.1, University of Nevada, Reno.
21. Lyons-Weiler J., Hoelzer G. A., Tausch R. J. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA). I. The statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;749-757.
22. Maddison, W. P. Maddison, D. R. 1992, MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. Medlin L., Elwood H. J., Stickel S., Sogin M. L. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene. 71:1988;491-499.
24. Morrison D. A. Phylogenetic tree-building. Int. J. Parasitol. 26:1996;589-617.
25. Morrison D. A., Ellis J. T. Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: A case study of 18S rDNAs of Apicomplexa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;428-441.
26. Smith A. B. Rooting molecular trees: Problems and strategies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51:1994;279-292.
27. Sogin M. L., Gunderson J. H. Structural diversity of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs. Evolutionary implications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 503:1987;125-139.
28. Steel M. A., Hendy M. D., Penny D. Loss of information in genetic distances. Nature. 336:1988;118.
29. Swofford, D. L. 1993, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
30. Swofford D. L., Maddison W. P. Reconstructing ancestral states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87:1987;199-229.
31. Tenter A. M., Baverstock P. R., Johnson A. M. Phylogenetic relationships ofSarcocystis. Int. J. Parasitol. 22:1992;503-513.
32. Turner D. H., Sugimoto N., Frier S. M. RNA structure prediction. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17:1988;167-192.
33. Uggla A., Buxton D. Immune responses againstToxoplasmaSarcocystis. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 9:1990;441-462.
34. Van de Peer Y., Neefs J.-M., De Rijk P., De Wachter R. Reconstructing evolution from eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences: Calibration of the molecular clock. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;221-232.
35. Van de Peer Y., Van der Auwera G., De Wachter R. The evolution of Stramenopiles and Alveolates as derived by "substitution rate calibration" of small ribosomal subunit RNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:1996a;201-210.
36. Van de Peer Y., Chapelle S., De Wachter R. A quantitative map of nucleotide substitution rates in bacterial rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1996b;3381-3391.
37. Van de Peer Y., Jansen J., De Rijk P., De Wachter R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;111-116.
38. Varani G., Pardi A. Structure of RNA. Nagai K., Mattaj I. W. RNA-Protein Interactions. 1994;1-24 IRL Press, Oxford.
39. Vawter L., Brown W. M. Rates and patterns of base change in the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Genetics. 134:1993;597-608.
40. Wakeley J. The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: New methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;158-163.
41. Westhof E., Michel F. Prediction and experimental investigation of RNA secondary and tertiary foldings. Nagai K., Mattaj I. W. RNA-Protein Interactions. 1994;25-51 IRL Press, Oxford.
42. Wilkinson, L. 1991, SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Systat Inc. Evanston, IL.
43. Yang Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;367-372.
44. Yang Z., Kumar S. Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;650-659.
45. Zuker M. Computer prediction of RNA structure. Methods Enzymol. 180:1989;262-288.