Assessment of the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) in the COLIPA in vitro eye irritation validation study

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 285-293

  Bagley, D M ^a   Cerven, D ^b   Harbell, J ^c  

^a Oral Care Research and Development   (United States)

^b MB Research Laboratories   (United States)

^c Institute for in Vitro Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative; Chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA); Eye irritation; Validation

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CHORIOALLANTOIS; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; EYE IRRITATION; LABORATORY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCREENING TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0033063317     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2333(98)00089-7     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bagley D.M., Bruner L.H., DeSilva O., Cottin M., O'Brien K.A.F., Uttley M., Walker A.P. An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro. 6:1992;275-284.
2. Bagley D.M., et al. The SDA alternatives program phase III: Comparison of in vitro data with animal eye irritation data on solvents, surfactants, oxidizing agents, and prototype cleaning products. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 13:1994;127-155.
3. Bagley D.M., Rizvi P.Y., Kong B.M., DeSalva S.J. Factors affecting use of the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane as a model for predicting eye irritation potential. I. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 10:1991;95-104.
4. Bagley D.M., Rizvi P.Y., Kong B.M., DeSalva S.J. Evaluation of the vascular components of the chorioallantoic membrane assay as a model for eye irritation potential. II. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 10:1991;105-113.
5. Bagley D.M., Waters D., Kong B.M. Development of a 10-day chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay as an alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 32:1994;1155-1160.
6. Brantom P.G., et al. A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro. 11:1997;141-179.
7. Gettings S. D., Rozen M. G., Bagley D. M., Casterton P. L. et al. (1995) The CTFA evaluation of alternatives programme: A summary of the results of an analysis of the performance of a series of promising alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. ATLA Proceedings of an International Scientific Conference organized by The European Cosmetic Industry.
8. Leighton J., Nassauer J., Tchao R., Verdone J. Development of a procedure using the chick egg as an alternative to the Draize rabbit test. Alternative Methods in Toxicology. 1:1983;163-177.
9. Spielmann H., Liebsch M., Moldenhauer F., Holzhütter H.-G., Bagley D.M., Lipman J.M., Pape W.J.W., Miltenburger H., de Silva O., Hofer H., Steiling W. IRAG Working Group 2: CAM-based assays. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 35:1997;39-66.