Errors in histopathology reporting: Detection and avoidance

Histopathology

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 481-490

  Ramsay, A D ^a  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Medical audit; Professional competence; Quality assurance; Quality of health care; Surgical pathology

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW;

DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL;

EID: 0033060184     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00719.x     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. 1. Murley R. All must audit. Br. Med. J. 1989; 298; 1032-1033.
2. 2. Teasdale S. The future of clinical audit: learning to work together. Br. Med. J. 1996; 313; 574.
3. 3. Kingman S. Birmingham pathologist criticised for misdiagnoses. Br. Med. J. 1993; 307; 581.
4. 4. Chaudhary V. Consultant suspended after tests errors. The Guardian 1995; 14 July: 6.
5. 5. Wintour P. Doctors to become whistleblowers. The Guardian 1995; 7 August: 3.
6. 6. Warden J. Locum's errors prompt review. Br. Med. J. 1996; 312; 799-798.
7. 7. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. Br. Med. J. 1998; 316; 1917-1918.
8. 8. Scally G, Donaldson LJ. Clinical governance and the drive for quality in the new NHS in England. Br. Med. J. 1998; 317; 61-65.
9. 9. Mitchell M, Fowkes FGR. Audit reviewed: does feedback of performance change clinical behaviour? J. R. Coll. Physicians 1985; 19; 251-254.
10. 10. The Royal College of Physicians. Report from the workshop on medical audit. Royal College Physicians, London; 19 May 1989. Med. Ed. 1990; 24: 81-89.
11. 11. Cocker J, Fox H, Langley FA. Consistency in the histological diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities of the cervix uteri. J. Clin. Pathol. 1968; 21; 67-70.
12. 12. Morson BC. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. Br. Med. J. 1981; 283; 1493.
13. 13. Buckley CH, Butler GB, Fox H. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Clin. Pathol. 1982; 35; 1-13.
14. 14. Owen DA, Tighe JR. Quality evaluation in histopathology. Br. Med. J. 1975; 1; 149-150.
15. 15. Lesna M. Assessing diagnostic errors: When is suspension of a pathologist justified? J. Clin. Pathol. 1998; 51; 649-651.
16. 16. Legg EF, Hursell AE. External quality assessment of quantitative urinary analysis. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 1984; 21; 491-493.
17. 17. Chambers RE, Wicher JT, Bullock DG. External quality assessment of immunoassays for specific proteins in serum; 18 month's experience in the United Kingdom. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 1984; 21; 246-253.
18. 18. Reed SE, Gardner PS, Snell JJS, Cha O. United Kingdom scheme for external quality assessment in virology. Part I. General method of operation. J. Clin. Pathol. 1985; 38; 534-541.
19. 19. Reed SE, Gardner PS, Snell JJS, Cha O. United Kingdom scheme for external quality assessment in virology. Part II. Specimen distribution, performance assessment and analysis of participants' methods in detection of rubella antibody, hepatitis B markers, general virus serology, virus identification and electron microscopy. J. Clin. Pathol. 1985; 38; 542-553.
20. 20. Snell JJS, Brown DFJ, Phua TJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: a trial organised as part of the United Kingdom national external quality assurance scheme for microbiology. J. Clin. Pathol. 1986; 39; 1006-1012.
21. 21. Snell JJS, Brown DFJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseira gonorrhoea: a trial organised as part of the United Kingdom national external quality assurance scheme for microbiology. J. Clin. Pathol. 1988; 41; 97-102.
22. 22. Pollen L, Taberner DA, Thomson JM, Darby KV. Survey of prothrombin time in the National External Quality Assessment exercises (1980-87). J. Clin. Pathol. 1988; 41; 361-364.
23. 23. Zuk JA, Kenyon WE, Myskow MW. Audit in histopathology; description of an internal quality assessment scheme with analysis of preliminary results. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991; 44; 10-15.
24. 24. Ramsay AD, Gallagher PJ. Local audit of surgical pathology. 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1992; 16; 476-482.
25. 25. Hocking GR, Niteckis VN, Cairns BJ, Hayman JA. Departmental audit in surgical anatomical pathology. Pathology 1997; 29; 418-421.
26. 26. Barr WT, Williams ED. Value of external quality assessment of technical aspects of histopathology. J. Clin. Pathol. 1982; 35; 1050-1056.
27. 27. Chow JW, Dilly SA. Method of auditing turnround time in histopathology related to user requirements. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991; 44; 492-496.
28. 28. The Royal College of Pathologists. Medical and Scientific Staffing of National Health Service Pathology Departments. Royal College of Pathologists, London, April 1992: pp. 5-6.
29. 29. Menai Williams R. Medical and scientific staffing of NHS pathology departments. Bull. Royal Coll. Pathol. 1992; 80; 19-20.
30. 30. Cook MG. Medical and scientific staffing of NHS pathology departments. Bull. Roy. Coll. Pathol. 1993; 81; 24.
31. 31. Lauder I. Medical and scientific staffing of NHS pathology departments. Bull. Roy. Coll. Pathol. 1993; 81; 24-25.
32. 32. Association of Directors of Anatomic, Surgical Pathology. Recommendations on Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Anatomic Pathology. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1991; 15; 1007-1009.
33. 33. Ismail SM, Colclough AB, Dinnen JS et al. Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br. Med. J. 1989; 298; 707-710.
34. 34. Robertson AJ, Anderson JM, Swanson Beck J et al. Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989; 42; 231-238.
35. 35. Holman CDJ, Matz LR, Finlay-Jones LR et al. Inter-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of Hodgkin's disease: an analysis of diagnostic subcomponents using kappa statistics. Histopathology 1983; 7; 399-407.
36. 36. Hastrup N, Clemmensen OJ, Spaun E, Sondergaarde K. Dysplastic naevus: histological criteria and their inter-observer reproducibility. Histopathology 1994; 24; 503-509.
37. 37. Beck JS. and Members of the MRC Breast Tumour Pathology Panel. Observer variation in reporting of breast lesions. J. Clin. Pathol. 1985; 38; 1358-1365.
38. 38. Howat AJ, Beck S, Fox H et al. Can histopathologists reliably diagnose molar pregnancy? J. Clin. Pathol. 1993; 46; 599-602.
39. 39. Anonymous. A nationwide survey of observer variation in the diagnosis of thin cutaneous malignant melanoma including the MIN terminology. CRC Melanoma Pathology Panel. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997; 50; 202-205.
40. 40. Farmer ER, Gonin R, Hanna MP. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists. Human Pathol. 1998; 29; 100-102.
41. 41. Foucar E. Do pathologists play dice? Uncertainty and early histopathological diagnosis of common malignancies. Histopathology 1997; 31; 495-502.
42. 42. Morris JA. Information and observer disagreement in histopathology. Histopathology 1994; 25; 123-128.
43. 43. Cross SS. Grading and scoring in histopathology. Histopathology 1998; 33; 99-106.
44. 44. Batstone G. Practising by the evidence: the role of pathology. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997; 50; 447-448.
45. 45. Costa A, Hubbard SM. Evidence based medicine, a new challenge. Eur. J. Cancer 1997; 33; 987-988.
46. 46. Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. Br. Med. J. 1998; 316; 1230-1232.
47. 47. Prescott RJ, Wells S, Bisset DL, Banerjee SS, Harris M. Audit of tumour histopathology reviewed by a regional oncology centre. J. Clin. Pathol. 1995; 48; 245-249.
48. 48. Slater D. Diagnosis in histopathology: is often unclear. Br. Med. J. 1993; 307; 940.
49. 49. Cree IA, Guthrie W, Anderson JM et al. Departmental audit in histopathology. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1993; 189; 453-457.
50. 50. Whitehead ME, Grieve JHK, Payne MJ, Ross MS. Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnosis in the British Army: role of the Army Histopathology Registry in completed case review. J. R. Army Med. Corps. 1986; 132; 71-75.
51. 51. Safrin RE, Bark CJ. Surgical pathology signout: routine review of every case by a second pathologist. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1993; 17; 1190-1192.
52. 52. Lind AC, Bewtra C, Healy JC, Sims KL. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1995; 104; 560-566.
53. 53. Oneson RH, Minke JA, Silverberg SG. Intraoperative pathologic consultation. An audit of 1000 recent consecutive cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1989; 13; 237-243.
54. 54. Howanitz PJ, Hoffman GG, Zarbo RJ. The accuracy of frozen section diagnoses in 34 hospitals. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1990; 114; 355-359.
55. 55. Barendregt WB, De Boer HHM, Kubat K. Autopsy analysis in surgical patients: a basis for clinical diagnosis. Br. J. Surg. 1992; 79; 1297-1299.
56. 56. Jamjoom A, Moss T, Jamjoom ZA, Stanjalis G. The value of autopsies in neurosurgery. Acta Neurol. 1991; 112; 126-131.
57. 57. Grundmann E. Autopsy as clinical quality control: a study of 15 143 autopsy cases. In Vivo 1994; 8: 945-952.
58. 58. Veress B, Alafuzoff I. Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras. Qual. Assur. Health Care 1993; 5; 281-286.
59. 59. Veress B, Alafuzoff I. A retrospective analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3042 cases during two different time periods. Human Pathol. 1994; 25: 140-145.
60. 60. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP III. Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? J Am. Med. Assoc. 1998; 280; 1273-1274.
61. 61. Haug PJ, Clayton PD, Tocino I et al. Chest radiography: a tool for the audit of report quality. Radiology 1991; 180; 271-276.
62. 62. Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Weigelt MA, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 1992; 183; 145-150.
63. 63. Weston MJ, Morse A, Slack NF. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service. Br. J. Radiol. 1994; 67; 665-667.
64. 64. Kirch W, Schafii C. Misdiagnosis at a University Hospital in 4 medical eras. Report on 400 cases. Medicine 1996; 75; 29-43.
65. 65. Troxel DB, Sabella JD. Problem areas in pathology practice uncovered by a review of malpractice claims. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1994; 18; 821-831.
66. 66. Murthy MSN, Derman H. Quality assurance in surgical pathology - personal and peer assessment. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1981; 75 (Suppl.): 462-466.
67. 67. Morris C. Quantitative Approaches in Business Studies. London, Pitman, 1993: 173-190.
68. 68. Stephenson PM, Gallagher PJ. Prospective audit of mucosal biopsy specimens of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Clin. Pathol. 1995; 48; 936-938.
69. 69. Bull AD, Biffin AH, Mella J et al. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997; 50; 138-142.
70. 70. Parkes SE, Muir KR, Cameron AH et al. The need for specialist review of pathology in paediatric cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1997; 75; 1156-1159.
71. 71. Santoso JT, Coleman RI, Voet RL, Bernstein SG, Lifshitz S, Miller D. Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology. Obstetr. Gynecol. 1998; 91; 730-734.
72. 72. Macartney JC, Henson DE, Codling BW. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1981; 75; 467-475.
73. 73. Wakeley SL, Baxendine-Jones JA, Gallagher PJ, Mullee M, Pickering R. Aberrant diagnoses by individual surgical pathologists. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1998; 22; 77-82.
74. 74. McBroom HM, Ramsay AD. The clinico-pathological meeting. A means of auditing diagnostic performance. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1993; 17; 75-80.
75. 75. Furness PN, Lauder I. Response analysis in histopathology external quality assessment schemes. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993; 46; 357-363.
76. 76. Griffiths DFR. Histopathology EQAs: The definition and identification of poor performance. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993; 46; 972.
77. 77. Horton R. How should doctors respond to the GMC's judgments on Bristol? Lancet 1998; 351; 1900-1901.
78. 78. Anonymous. First lessons from the 'Bristol case'. Lancet 1998; 51; 1669.
79. 79. Davies DR, Batstone GF. Quality assessment schemes (external quality assessment and clinical audit in histopathology). Bull. R. Coll. Pathol. 1995; 90; 12-13.
80. 80. NHS Executive Letter EL(98)2 (23 January 1998). Oversight of provision of external quality assessment schemes in histopathology cytopathology, cytogenetics and molecular genetics for pathology laboratories. London: Department of Health, 1998.
81. 81. Cross SS. Kappa statistics as indicators of quality assurance in histopathology and cytopathology. J. Clin. Pathol 1996; 49; 597-599.
82. 82. Silcocks P. Some issues in observer error studies in pathology. J. Pathol. 1992; 168; 255-256.
83. 83. Furness PN, Lauder I. A questionnaire-based survey of errors in diagnostic histopathology throughout the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997; 50; 457-460.
84. 84. Stucki G. Specialist management: needs and benefits. Baillieres Clin. Rheumatol. 1997; 11; 97-107.
85. 85. Rydhom A. Improving the management of soft tissue sarcoma. Diagnosis and treatment should be given in specialist centres. Br. Med. J. 1998; 317; 93-94.
86. 86. Arul GS, Spicer RD. Where should paediatric surgery be performed? Arch. Dis. Childhood 1998; 79; 65-70.
87. 87. Miller JM, Slater DN. Do histopathology reports of primary cutaneous melanoma contain enough essential information? J. Clin. Pathol. 1996; 49; 202-204.
88. 88. Dey P, Woodman CB, Gibbs A, Coyne J. Completeness of reporting on prognostic factors for breast carcinoma: a regional survey. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997; 50; 829-831.
89. 89. Appleton MA, Douglas-Jones AG, Morgan JM. Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens. J. Clin. Pathol. 1998; 51; 30-33.
90. 90. Cross SS, Feeley KM, Angel CA. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colonic carcinomas. J. Clin. Pathol. 1998; 51; 481-482.
91. 91. The Royal College of Pathologists. Standards and Minimum Datasets for Reporting Common Cancers. Minimum dataset for breast cancer histopathology reports. London: Royal College of Pathologists, July 1998.
92. 92. The Royal College of Pathologists. Standards and Minimum Datasets for Reporting Common Cancers. Minimum dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports. London: Royal College of Pathologists, July 1998.
93. 93. Jenkins D, Balsitis M, Gallivan S et al. Guidelines for the initial biopsy diagnosis of suspected chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. The British Society of Gastroenterology Initiative. J. Clin. Pathol 1997; 50; 93-105.
94. 94. Steiner GM. Diagnosis in histopathology. A multidisciplinary affair. Br. Med. J. 1993; 307; 940.