Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 730-734

  Santoso, Joseph T ^a   Coleman, Robert L ^a   Voet, Richard L ^a   Bernstein, Steven G ^a   Lifshitz, Samuel ^a   Miller, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HEALTH CARE COST; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GENITALIA, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL;

EID: 0031979326     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00032-5     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Safrin RE, Bark CJ. Surgical pathology sign out: Routine review of every case by a second pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17: 1190-1192.
2. Whitehead ME, Fitzwater JE, Lindley SK, Kern SB, Ulirsch RC, Winecoff WF III. Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnoses: A prospective audit of 3000 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1984;81:487-491.
3. Abt AB, Abt L, Olt GJ. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:514-517.
4. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Sanfilippo F. Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:851-857.
5. Lind AC, Bewtra C, Healy JC, Sims KL. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:560-566.
6. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Consultations in surgical pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17: 743-745.