Imposed retinal image size changes - Do they provide a cue to the sign of lens-induced defocus in chick?

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 320-325

  Schmid, Katrina L ^a,b   Strang, Niall C ^a   Wildsoet, Christine F ^a,b,c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chick; Emmetropization; Hyperopic defocus; Myopia; Retinal image size; Spectacle magnification

Indexed keywords

ABERRATIONS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES;

LENS-INDUCED DEFOCUS; MYOPIA; RETINAL IMAGE SIZE;

VISION;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; HYPERMETROPIA; LENS; MALE; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA IMAGE; SPECTACLES;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CHICKENS; CONTACT LENSES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FIXATION, OCULAR; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RETINA;

EID: 0033038679     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00021     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wallman J. Retinal control of eye growth and refraction. Prog Retinal Res 1993;12:133-53.
2. Goss DA, Wickham MG. Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. A literature review. Doc Ophthalmol 1995;90:341-75.
3. Wildsoet CF. Active emmetropization - evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:279-90.
4. Schaeffel F, Classer A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res 1988;28:639-57.
5. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr. Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. J Am Optom Assoc 1995; 66:405-14.
6. Hung LF, Crawford ML, Smith EL. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Med 1995;1: 761-5.
7. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:448-56.
8. Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J, Howland HC. Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci 1990;4:177-83.
9. Rohrer B, Schaeffel F, Zrenner E. Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: results from the chicken eye. J Physiol (Lond) 1992;449:363-76.
10. Wildsoet CF, Howland HC, Falconer S, Dick K. Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick. Vision Res 1993;33:1593-603.
11. Schwahn HN, Schaeffel F. Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:3516-24.
12. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vision Res 1996;36:1023-36.
13. Curry TA, Sivak JG, Callender MG, Irving EL. Afocal magnification does not influence chick eye development. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76: 316-9.
14. Oishi T, Murakami N. Effects of duration and intensity of illumination on several parameters of the chick eye. Comp Biochem Physiol (A) 1985;81:319-23.
15. Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res 1995;35: 1175-94.
16. Jalie M. The Principles of Ophthalmic Lenses. 4th ed. London: Association of British Dispensing Opticians, 1984.
17. Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:364-8.
18. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Hard contact lenses alter accommodative gain but do not prevent refractive adaptation in chicks. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:20-7.
19. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:61-7.
20. McLin LN Jr, Schor CM, Kruger PB. Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. Vision Res 1988;28: 883-98.
21. Westheimer G. Entoptic visualization of Stiles-Crawford effect. An indicator of eyeball shape. Arch Ophthalmol 1968;79:584-8.