Norms and prenorms on prenatal diagnosis: New ways to deal with morality in counseling

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 153-163

  Van Berkel, Dymphie ^a   Van Der Weele, Cor ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Counseling; Decision making; Morality; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MORALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST OF ILLNESS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; MATERNAL AGE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THERAPEUTIC ABORTION;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ABORTION, THERAPEUTIC; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COST OF ILLNESS; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0033037381     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00137-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Green J.M. Calming of harming? A critical review of psychological effects of fetal diagnosis on pregnant women. Galton Inst Occas Paper. 2:1990;1-50.
2. Shiloh S. Decision-making in the context of genetic risk. In: Marteau T, Richard M, editors. The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996:82-103.
3. Hersh RH, Miller JP, Fielding JD. Models of Moral Education; An Appraisal. New York: Longman, 1980.
4. Tijmstra T.J. The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of 'anticipated decision regret'. Int J Tech Assess Health Care. 5:1989;207-213.
5. Callahan D. Bioethics: private choice and common good. Hastings Center Report. May/June:1994;28-31.
6. Van't Spijker A., Ten Kroode H.F.J. Psychosocial aspects of genetic counseling: A review of the experience with Huntington's disease. Patient Educ Couns. 32:1997;33-40.
7. Skirton H., Barnes C., Curtis G., Walford-Moore J. The role and practice of the genetic nurse: report of the AGNC Working Party. J Med Genet. 34:1997;141-147.
8. Kessler S. Psychological aspects of genetic couseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. J Gen Couns. 6:1997;287-295.
9. Wolf S. Freedom Within Reason. New York: Oxford University press, 1990.
10. White M.T. 'Respect for autonomy' in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal. J Gen Couns. 6:1997;297-313.
11. KNMG (Royal Dutch Medical Society), Artsen en Genen, Utrecht, 1997.
12. Arras J.D. AIDS and reproductive decisions: having children in fear and trembling. The Milbank Quarterly. 68:1990;353-382.
13. Clarke A. Is non-directive genetic counseling possible? Lancet. 338:1991;998-1001.
14. Michie S., Bron F., Bobrow M., Marteau T. Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study. Am J Hum Genet. 60:1997;40-47.
15. Bernhardt B. Empirical evidence that genetic counseling is directive: Where do we go from here? Am J Hum Genet. 60:1997;17-20.
16. Van Zuuren F. The standard of neutrality during genetic counseling: an empirical investigation. Patient Educ Couns. 32:1997;69-79.