An analysis of the communication tactics used by hearing-impaired adults

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 17-27

  Stephens, S D G ^a   Jaworski, A ^d   Lewis, P ^b   Aslan, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^c SSK Diskapi Hospital   (Turkey)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Avoidance; Hearing tactics; Sociolinguistics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 0033037317     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000097     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Coupland J, Coupland N, Grainger K. Intergenerational discourse: Contextual versions of ageing and elderliness. Ageing and Society 1991; 11: 189-208.
2. Coupland N, Nussbaum JF (eds). Discourse and Lifespan Identity. Newbury Park CA: Sage, 1993.
3. Coupland N, Wiemann JM, Giles H. Talk as 'problem' and communication as 'miscommunication': An integrative analysis. In N Coupland, H Giles, J Wiemann (eds) 'Miscommunication' and Problematic Talk. Newbury Park CA: Sage, 1991, 1-17.
4. Davis A. Hearing in Adults. London: Whurr, 1995.
5. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Scale composition and item analysis of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 515-35.
6. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Dis 1987; 52: 129-43.
7. Erlandsson SI (ed). Psychological and psychosocial approaches to adult hearing loss. Scand Audiol. 1996; 25, Suppl. 43.
8. Field DL, Haggard MP. Knowledge of hearing tactics (I): assessment by questionnaire and inventory. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 349-54.
9. Hallberg L. Noise-induced hearing loss and its consequences on the individual and his family. Scand Audiol 1996; 25, Suppl 43: 25-33.
10. Hallberg L, Carlsson SG. A qualitative study of situations turning a hearing disability into a handicap. Disability, Handicap and Society 1993; 8: 71-86.
11. Hallberg L, Eriksson-Mangold M, Carlsson SG. Psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the communication strategies scale of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 666-74.
12. Hétu R. The stigma attached to hearing impairment. Scand Audiol 1996; 25, Suppl 43: 12-24.
13. Hétu R, Lalonde M, Getty L. Psychosocial disadvantages associated with occupational hearing loss as experienced by the family. Audiol 1987; 26: 141-52.
14. Jaworski A, Stephens D. Self-Reports on Silence as a Face-Saving Strategy by People with Hearing Impairment. Int J Applied Linguistics 1998; 8: 61-80.
15. Kerr PC, Stephens D. The use of an open-ended questionnaire to identify positive aspects of acquired hearing loss. Audiol 1997; 36: 19-28.
16. Martin J, Meltzer H, Eliot D. OPCS Surveys of disability in Great Britain. Report 1, The prevalence of disability among adults. London: HMSO, 1998.
17. Noble W. What is a psychosocial approach to hearing loss? Scand Audiol 1996; 25, Suppl 43: 6-11.
18. Noble W. Social and meterial ecologies for hearing impairment. In L Yardley (ed.) Material Discourses of Health and Illness. London: Routledge, 1997, 92-108.
19. Pichora-Fuller MK, Johnson CJ, Roodenburg KEJ. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: Balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Appl Com Res 1998; 26: 99-119.
20. Rampton B. A sociolinguistic perspective on L2 communication strategies. In G Kasper, E Kellerman (eds) Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. London: Longman, 1997, 279-303.
21. Shotter J, Gergen KJ (eds). Texts of Identity. London: Sage, 1989.
22. Stephens SDG. Hearing rehabilitation in a psychosocial framework. Scand Audiol 1996; 25, Suppl 43: 57-66.
23. Stephens SDG, France L, Lormore K. Effects of hearing impairment on the patient's family and friends. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 165-7.
24. Stephens SDG, Jaworski A, Kerr P, Zhao F. The use of patient-specific and estimates in patient evaluation and rehabilitation. Scand Audiol 1998; 27, Suppl 49: 61-8.
25. Stephens SDG, Lewis PA, Charny M. Assessing hearing problems within a community survey. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 337-43.
26. Stephens SDG, Zhao F. Hearing Impairment: Special needs of the elderly. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 1996; 48, 137-42.
27. Tannen D. The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In Tannen D (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993; 165-88.
28. Tracy K, Coupland N. Multiple goals in discourse: An overview of issues. In K Tracy, N Coupland N (eds) Multiple Goals in Discourse. Clevedon: Mulitlingual Matters, 1990.
29. Tye-Murray N, Purdy SC, Woodworth GC. Reported use of communication strategies by SHHH members: Client, talker, and situation variables. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 708-17.
30. Tye-Murray S W, Schum L. Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversation with adult cochlear-implant users. Ear Hear 1995: 459-69.
31. Vognsen S (ed.) Hearing Tactics: Copenhagen, Oticon, 1976.
32. Von der Lieth L. Hearing tactics I. Scand Audiol 1972; 1: 155-60.
33. Von der Lieth L. Hearing tactics II. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 209-13.