What is a psychosocial approach to hearing loss?

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 25, Issue 43, 1996, Pages 6-11

  Noble, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Hearing loss; Individual needs; Rehabilitation; Stigma

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING IMPAIRMENT;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HUMANS;

EID: 0029864208     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Barcham LJ, Stephens SDG. The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. Br J Audiol 1980; 14: 49-54.
2. Cooley RE, Roach DA, A conceptual framework. In: RN Bostrom (Eds.), Competence in communication: A multidisciplinary approach. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984; 11-32
3. Coulter J. The social construction of mind. London: MacMillan. DeCasper, AJ, Fifer WP. Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 1980; 208: 1174-1176.
4. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Scale composition and item analysis of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 515-535.
5. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1987; 52: 129-143.
6. Dillon H, Koritschoner E, Battaglia J, Lovegrove R, Ginis J, Mavrias G, Carnie L, Ray P, Forsythe L, Towers E, Goulias H, Macaskill F. Rehabilitation effectiveness I: assessing the needs of clients entering a national hearing rehabilitation program. Austr J Audiol 1991a; 13: 55-65.
7. Dillon H, Koritschoner E, Battaglia J, Lovegrove R, Ginis J, Mavrias G, Garnie L, Ray P, Forsythe L, Towers E, Goulias H, Macaskill F. Rehabilitation effectiveness II: assessing the outcomes for clients of a national hearing rehabilitation program. Austr J Audiol 1991b, 13: 68-82.
8. Erdman SA- Self-assessment: From research focus to research tool. In JP Gagné & N Tye-Murray (Eds.), Research in audiological rehabilitation: current trends and future directions. Monograph Supplement, J Acad Rehab Audiol 1984; 27: 67-90.
9. Erdman SA, Wark DJ, Montano JJ. Implications of service delivery models in audiology. J Acad Rehab Audiol. In press.
10. Gagné J-P. Tye-Murray N. (Eds.), Research in audiological rehabilitation: current trends and future directions. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1994; 27, (Monograph Supplement).
11. Giolas TG. Hearing-handicapped adults. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
12. Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
13. Groce NE. Everyone here spoke sign language: hereditary deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985.
14. Hétu R, Jones L, Getty L. The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: implications for rehabilitation. Audiology 1993; 32: 363-381.
15. Hétu R, Lalonde M, Getty L, Psychosocial disadvantages associated with occupational hearing loss as experienced in the family. Audiology 1987; 26: 141-152.
16. Hyde ML, Riko K. A decision-analytic approach to audiological rehabilitation. In J-P Gagné & N Tye-Murray (Eds.), Research in audiological rehabilitation: current trends and future directions. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1994; 27, (Monograph Supplement): 337-374.
17. Jones EE, Farina A, Hastorf AH, Markus H, Miller D. T, Scott RA. Social stigma. New York: Freeman, 1984.
18. Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychology and Aging 1994; 9: 339-355.
19. Noble W. Why is hearing impairment so handicapping? In W Noble, R Hétu, R Waugh, & L Getty (Eds.), Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: Prevention and rehabilitation. Sydney; Armidale: National Occupational Health and Safety Commission; University of New-England, 1990; 60-63.
20. Noble W. Self-report methodology in audiological research and practice: A mid-term report. Paper presented to a meeting of the International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology, Gothenburg, May, 1995.
21. Noble W. "Individual subject" vs "person in context" in behavioural research on health. In J. Daly (Ed.), Ethical intersections: Health research, methods and researcher responsibility. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin, in press a.
22. Noble W. Social and material ecologies for hearing impairment. In L Yardley (Ed.), Material discourses in the psychology of health. London: Routledge, in press b.
23. Noble W, Davidson I. Human evolution, language, and mind: a psychological and archaeological inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in press.
24. Rihkanen H. Subjective benefit of communication aids evaluated by postlingually deaf adults. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 161-166.
25. Salomon G, Vesterager V, Jagd, M. Age-related hearing difficulties I. Hearing impairment, disability, and handicap - a controlled study. Audiology 1988; 27: 164-178.
26. Stephens SDG, Lewis PA, Charny MC, Farrow SC, Francis M. Characteristics of self-reported hearing problems in a community survey. Audiology 1990; 29: 93-100.
27. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 128-134.