Evaluation of the EYTEX(TM) system in the COLIPA eye irritation program

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 295-304

  Courtellemont, P ^a   Pannetier, M ^a   Biesse, J P ^a   Larnicol, M ^b   Baret, J P ^b   Breda, B ^b  

^a Christian Dior   (France)

^b SANOFI   (France)

Author keywords

Alternative method; Biochemical assay; Ocular irritancy; Prediction model; Validation

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; ASSAY; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; EYE IRRITATION; LABORATORY; MODEL; PREDICTION; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0033036667     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2333(98)00081-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Balls M., Botham P.A., Bruner L.H., Spielmann H. The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro. 9:1995;871-929.
2. Blein O., Adolphe M., Lakhdar B., Cambar J., Gubanski G., Castelli D. Correlation and validation of alternatives methods to the Draize eye irritation test (Opal project). Toxicology in Vitro. 5:1991;555-557.
3. Brantom P.G., Bruner L.H., Chamberlain M., De Silva O., Dupuis J., Earl L.K., Lovell D.P., Pape W.J.W., Uttley M. A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro. 11:1997;141-179.
4. Bruner L.H., Carr G.J., Chamberlain M., Curren R.D. Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing. Toxicology in Vitro. 10:1996;479-501.
5. Bruner L.H., Kain D.J., Roberts D.A., Parker R.D. Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 17:1991;136-149.
6. TM system as a screening method for ocular tolerance: Application to raw materials and finished products. ATLA. 20:1992;466-470.
7. Gettings S.D., Bagley D.M., Demetrulias J.L., Dipasquale L.C., Hintze K.L., Rozen M.G., Teal J.J., Weise S.L., Chudkowski M., Marenus K.D., Pape W.J.W., Roddy M.T., Schnetzinger R., Silber P.M., Glaza S.M., Kurtz P.J. The CTFA evaluation program, an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase I) Hydro-alcoholic formulations; (part 2) Data analysis and biological significance. In Vitro Toxicology. 3:1991;293-302.
8. TM, an in vitro method for evaluation of ocular irritancy. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 5, Approaches to Validation. Edited by A. M. Goldberg, pp. 293-302. Mary Ann Liebert, New York.
9. Itagaki H., Inoue T., Kaneko T., Morikawa Y., Yoshida T., Hayashi M., Momma J., Ohno T., Fujii A., Masuda M., Akiyama J., Ikeda N., Imanishi Y., Usami M., Ohkoshi K., Okumura H., Kakishima H., Kasai Y., Kurishita A., Kojima H., Saijo K., Sakamoto K., Takano K., Tatsumi H., Tani N., Chiba K., Nakamura T., Matsukawa K., Watanabe K. and Ohno Y. (1995) Inter-laboratory validation of alternative methods to eye irritation test for safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. In Alternatives to Animal Testing. Edited by S. G. Lisansky, R. Macmillan and J. Dupuis, Vol. 308. CPL Press, Newbury.
10. TM system to the evaluation of cosmetic products and their ingredients. ATLA. 20:1992;146-163.
11. TM data: a user's guide. ATLA. 21:1993;239-259.
12. Montgomery and Peck (1982) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Vol. 39. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. TM system as a screening method for the ocular irritancy of chemical products. ATLA. 22:1994;32-50.
14. Sokal and Rohlf (1969) Biometry, Vol. 422. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco.