An extinction cue reduces spontaneous recovery of a conditioned taste aversion

Animal Learning and Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-88

  Brooks, Douglas C ^a   Palmatier, Matthew I ^a   Garcia, Eliseo O ^a   Johnson, Jessica L ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHARIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASTE AVERSION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0033033939     PISSN: 00904996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03199433     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ARCHER, T., SJODÉN, P. O., & NILSSON, L.-G. (1985). Contextual control of taste-aversion conditioning and extinction. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 225-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BEST, M. R. (1975). Conditioned and latent inhibition in taste-aversion learning: Clarifying the role of learned safety. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 97-113.
3. BEST, M. R., BATSON, J. D., MEACHUM, C. L., BROWN, E. R., & RINGER, M. (1985). Characteristics of taste-mediated environmental potentiation in rats. Learning & Motivation, 16, 190-209.
4. BEST, M R., DUNN, D P., BATSON, J. D., MEACHUM, C. L., & NASH, S. M. (1985) Extinguishing conditioned inhibition in flavouraversion learning Effects of repeated testing and extinction of the excitatory element. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 359-378
5. BOUTON, M E (1982) Lack of reinstatement of an extinguished taste aversion Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 233-241
6. BOUTON, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain. emotion. and cognition (pp. 25-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. BOUTON, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
8. BOUTON, M. E. (1994). Context, time, and ambiguity in Pavlovian conditioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 49-53.
9. BOUTON, M.E., & BROOKS, D. C. (1993). Time and physical context effects in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 165-179.
10. BROOKS, D C. (in press). Local and remote extinction cues reduce spontaneous recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
11. BROOKS, D. C., & BOUTON, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 77-89.
12. BROOKS, D. C., & BOUTON, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366-379.
13. BROOKS, D. C., & NEVES, J. L. (1998). Counterconditioned extinction cues reduce spontaneous recovery: Evaluation of contextual control. occasion setting, and the erasure effect. Unpublished manuscript.
14. BURDICK, C. K., & JAMES, J. P. (1970). Spontaneous recovery of conditioned suppression of licking by rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 72, 467-470.
15. CARLTON, J. L., MITCHELL, K. G., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1996). Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction of a conditioned stimulus. Learning & Motivation, 27, 335-361.
16. CUNNINGHAM, C. L. (1981). Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 425-436.
17. DELAMATER, A. R., KRUSE, J. M., MARLIN, S., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1986). Conditioned inhibition in taste aversion learning: Testing methodology and empirical status. Animal Learning & Behavior, 14, 6-14.
18. DURLACH, P J., & RESCORLA, R A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 175-187.
19. ELLINS, S. R., & VON KLUGE, S. (1987). Preexposure and extinction effects of lithium chloride induced taste-potentiated aversions for spatially contiguous auditory food cues in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 164-169.
20. ELLSON, D. G (1939). Spontaneous recovery of the galvanic skin response as a function of the recovery interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 586-600.
21. GARCIA, J. (1989). Food for Tolman: Cognition and cathexis in concert. In T. Archer & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance. and anxiety. Perspectives on aversively motivated behavior (pp 45-85), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. GARCIA, J., HANKINS, W. G., & RUSINIAK, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat, Science, 185, 824-831.
23. GARCIA, J , & KOELLING, R. A (1966) Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123-124.
24. HOLLAND, P. C. (1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning & Motivation, 12, 1-18.
25. HOLLAND, P. C (1989). Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 311-328.
26. HOLLAND, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 29, pp. 69-125). San Diego Academic Press.
27. HOWELL, D. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston PWS-Kent.
28. KRAEMER, P J., & SPEAR, N. E. (1992). The effect of nonreinforced stimulus exposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: Do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process' Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 1-7
29. LEWIS, D. J (1956). Acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery as a function of percentage of reinforcement and intertrial intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 45-53.
30. LIEBERMAN, D. A., DAVIDSON, F. H., & THOMAS, G. V. (1985). Marking in pigeons: The role of memory in delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 611-624.
31. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1971). An analysis of overshadowing and blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 118-125.
32. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
33. PAVLOV, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
34. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
35. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
36. PUENTE, G. P., CANNON, D. S., BEST, M. R., & CARRELL, L. E. (1988). Occasion setting of fluid ingestion by contextual cues. Learning &. Motivation, 19, 239-253.
37. RESCORLA, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77-94.
38. RESCORLA, R. A. (1973). Evidence for "unique stimulus" account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology; 85, 331-338.
39. RESCORLA, R. A. (1979). Conditioned inhibition and extinction. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski (pp. 83-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. RESCORLA, R. A. (1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. RESCORLA, R. A. (1997). Spontaneous recovery after Pavlovian conditioning with multiple outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 99-107.
42. RESCORLA, R. A., & CUNNINGHAM, C. L. (1978). Recovery of the US representation over time during extinction. Learning & Motivation, 9, 373-391.
43. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
44. ROBBINS, S. J. (1990). Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 235-249.
45. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 341-348.
46. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1997) Renewal of a conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one. Learning & Motivation, 28, 216-229.
47. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval can have additive, rather than interactive, effects in taste aversion learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 79-83.
48. ROZIN, P., & KALAT, J. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning. Psychological Review, 78, 459-486.
49. SCHACHTMAN, T. R., BROWN, A. M., & MILLER, R. R. (1985). Rein-statement-induced recovery of a taste-LiCl association following extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 223-227.
50. SLOTNICK, B. M., WESTBROOK, F., & DARLING, F. M. C. (1997). What the rat's nose tells the rat's mouth: Long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 357-369.
51. SPEAR, N. E. (1978). The processing of memories: Forgetting and retention Htllsdale. NJ Erlbaum.
52. THOMAS, D. R., & SHFRMAN, L (1986). An assessment of the role of handling cues in spontaneous recovery after extinction Journal of the Experimental Analisis of Behavior, 46, 305-314
53. WAGNER, A. R (1981). SOP. A model of automatic memory processing in animai behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds ), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hiilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.