Diversity of functions of proteins with internal symmetry in spatial arrangement of secondary structural elements

Protein Science

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1210-1217

  Kinoshita, Kengo ^a   Kidera, Akinori ^a   Go, Nobuhiro ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Evolution of protein; Spatial arrangement of secondary structural elements; Symmetry of protein folds; Three dimensional structure comparison

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

EID: 0033031012     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.6.1210     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alexandrov NN, Go N. 1994. Biological meaning, statistical significance, and classification of local spatial similarities in nonhomologous proteins. Protein Sci 3:866-875.
2. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer EE, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. 1977. The Protein Data Bank: A computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535-542.
3. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJP. 1997. Population statistics of protein structures: Lesson from structural classification. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:369-376.
4. Chothia C, Finkelstein AV. 1990. The classification and origins of protein folding patterns. Annu Rev Biochem 59:1007-1039.
5. Gaudet R, Bohm A, Sigler BP. 1996. Crystal structure at 2.4 Å resolution of the complex of transducin beta-gamma and its regulator, phosducin. Cell 87:577-588.
6. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Bryant SH. 1996. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:377-385.
7. Hobohm U, Sander C. 1994. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 3:522-524.
8. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. 1992. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci 1:409-417.
9. Holm L, Sander C. 1996. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273:595-602.
10. Kabsch W, Sander C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637.
11. Karlin S, Altschul SF. 1990. Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2264-2268.
12. Kraulis PJ. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of proteins structures. J Appl Cryst 24:946-950.
13. Mizuguchi K, Go N. 1995. Comparison of spatial arrangements of secondary structural elements in proteins. Protein Eng 8:353-362.
14. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
15. Orengo C, Michie A, Jones S, Swindells M, Thornton J. 1997. CATH: A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093-1108.
16. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM. 1994. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372:631-634.
17. Rao ST, Rossmann MG. 1973. Comparison of supersecondary structures in proteins. J Mol Biol 76:241-256.
18. Richardson JS. 1977. Beta-sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature 268:495-500.
19. Saarinen M, Gleason KF, Eklund H. 1995. Crystal structure of thioredoxin-2 from Anabaena. Structure 3:1097-1108.
20. Wolynes PG. 1996. Symmetry and the energy landscapes of biomolecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14249-14255.