Effect of sediment size on area of influence during groundwater remediation by air sparging: A laboratory approach

Environmental Geology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-6

  Peterson, J W ^a   Lepczyk, P A ^a   Lake, K L ^a  

^a HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Air sparging; Area of influence; Groundwater; Remediation

Indexed keywords

GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; REMEDIATION; SEDIMENTS; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

AIR SPARGING;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION;

AIR SPARGING; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; LABORATORY METHOD; PARTICLE SIZE; REMEDIATION; SEDIMENT PROPERTY;

EID: 0033023757     PISSN: 09430105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002540050394     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AHLFELD DP, DAHMANI MA, JI W (1994) A conceptual model of field behavior of air sparging and its implications for application. Ground Water Monitor Remed 14:132-139
2. ANGELL KG, BASS DH, BROWN RA, DACEY MF, HERMAN C, HENRY E, KRESGE M (1992) Air sparging case studies: proof that an innovative technique works. In: Kostecki PT, Calabrese EJ, Bonazountas M (eds.) Hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Lewis, Chelsea, MI, pp 407-436
3. BARKER JF, PATRICK GC, MAJOR D (1987) Natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water Monitor Remed 7:64-71
4. BOHLER U, BRAUNS J, HOTZL H, NAHOLD M (1990) Air injection and soil aeration as a combined method for cleaning contaminated sites: observations from test sites in sediments and solid rocks. In: Arendt F, Hinsenveld M, Van Den Brink WJ (eds.) Contaminated soils 1990, Kluwer Academic, Dordrect, pp 1039-1044
5. FETTER CW (1994) Applied hydrogeology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
6. HOEPPEL RE, HINCHEE RE, ARTHUR MF (1991) Bioventing of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. J Indust Microbio 18:141-146
7. JI W, DAHMANI MA, AHLFELD DP, LIN JD, HILL E (1993) Laboratory study of air sparging: air flow visualization. Ground Water Monitor Remed 13:115-126
8. JOHNSON RL, JOHNSON PC, MCWHORTER DB, HINCHEE RE, GOODMAN I (1993) An overview of in situ air sparging. Ground Water Monitor Remed 13:127-135
9. LEONARD WC, BROWN RA (1992) Air sparging: an optimal solution. In: Proceedings of petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water: prevention, detection and restoration. National Ground Water Association, Dublin, OH, pp 349-363
10. LODEN ME, FAN CY (1992) Air sparging technology evaluation. In: Proceedings of 2nd National Research and Development Conference on the Control of Hazardous Materials. Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Greenbelt, MD, pp 328-334
11. MARLEY MD, HAZENBROUCK DJ, WALSH MT (1992) The application of in situ air sparging as an innovative soils and ground water remediation technology. Ground Water Monit Rev, 12:137-145
12. NYER EK, SCHAFER DC (1994) There are no in situ methods. Ground Water Monitor Remed 14:120-123
13. PAYNE FC, ROGERS DT, BUEHLMAN MD (1996) Chlorinated solvent reductions induced by an aquifer sparge fence. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on In-Situ Air Sparging for Site Remediation. International Network for Environmental Training, Potomac, MD
14. PLUMMER CR, NELSON JD, ZUMWALT GS (1997) Horizontal and vertical well comparison for in situ air sparging. Ground Water Monitor Remed, 17:91-96
15. PROTHERO DR, SCHWAB F (1996) Sedimentary geology: an introduction to sedimentary rocks and stratigraphy. Freeman, New York
16. RUTHERFORD KW, JOHNSON PC (1996) Effects of process control changes on aquifer oxygenation rates during in situ air sparging in homogeneous aquifers. Ground Water Monitor Remed 16:132-141
17. SCHIMA S, LABRECQUE DJ, LUNDEGARD PD (1996) Monitoring air sparging using resistivity tomography. Ground Water Monitor Remed 16:131-138
18. SELLERS KL, SCHREIBER RF (1992) Air sparging model for predicting ground water clean up rate. In: Proceedings of petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water: prevention, detection and restoration. National Ground Water Association, Dublin, OH, pp 365-376