Histological correlation of microcalcifications in breast biopsy specimens

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 712-716

  Johnson, Jeanne M ^a   Dalton, Rory R ^a   Wester, Susan M ^a   Landercasper, Jeffrey ^a   Lambert, Pamela J ^a  

^a GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0033015458     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.7.712     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Leborgne R. Diagnsitco de los tumores de la mama por la radiographia simple. Bol Soc Cir Uruguay. 1949;20:407-422.
2. Levitan LH, Witten DM, Harrison EG. Calcifications in breast disease: mammographic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1964;92:29-39.
3. Sickles E. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. 1986; 160:289-293.
4. D'Orsi EJ, Reale FR, Davis MA, Brown VJ. Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation. Radiology. 1991; 180:397-401.
5. Liberman L, Evans WP III, Dershaw D, et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology. 1994;190:223-225.
6. Monsees BS. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995; 33:1109-1119.
7. Harris JR, Morrow M, Lippman ME, Hellman S, editors. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996.
8. Smith R, Osuch J, Linver M. A national breast cancer database. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1247-1258.
9. Dahlstrom JE, Sutton S, Jain S. Histologic-radiologic correlation of mammographically detected microcalcification in stereotactic core biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:256-259.
10. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1989;172:235-241.
11. Selim A, Tahan SR. Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinomas: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies. Ann Surg. 1998;228: 95-98.
12. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histologic correlations of breast carcinoma in situ. Lancet. 1990;335:519-522.
13. Johnson JM, Dalton RR, Landercasper J, et al. Image-guided or needle-localized open biopsy of mammographic malignant-appearing microcalcifications? J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:604-609.
14. Stomper PC, Cholewinski SP, Penetrante RB, et al. Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination. Radiology. 1993;189:667-671.
15. Fuhrman GM, Cederborn GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg. 1998;227:932-939.
16. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology. 1994;193:91-95.
17. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1111-1113.
18. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359-364.