Image-guided or needle-localized open biopsy of mammographic malignant- appearing microcalcifications?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 604-609

  Johnson, Jeanne M ^a   Dalton, Rory R ^a   Landercasper, Jeffrey ^a   Travelli, Renato ^a   Lambert, Pamela J ^a  

^a GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; CALCIFICATION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0031736694     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00247-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193: 359-364.
2. Elvecrog E, Lechner M, Nelson M. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993;188:453-455.
3. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991;180: 403-407.
4. Pettine S, Place R, Sankaran B, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective. Am J Surg 1996; 171:474-476.
5. Cross MJ, Evans WP, Peters GN, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1995;2: 195-200.
6. Harris JR, Morrow M, Lippman ME, Hellman S, eds. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
7. Smith R, Osuch J, Linver M. A national breast cancer database. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1247-1258.
8. Monsees BS. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1109-1119.
9. Dempsey PJ, Rubin E. The roles of needle biopsy and periodic follow-up in the evaluation and diagnosis of breast lesions. Seminars in Roentgenology 1993;28(3):252-258.
10. Morrow M, Schmidt R, Cregger B, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies. Arch Surg 1994;129:1091-1096.
11. Whitten TM, Wallace TW, Bird RE, Turk PS. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;12: 1072-1078.
12. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: its history, its present, and its future. Am Surg 1996;62:128-161.
13. Schmidt RA. Stereotactic breast biopsy. CA Cancer J Clin 1994; 44:172-191.
14. Liberman L, Evans WP III, Dershaw D, et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994;190:223-225.
15. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91-95.
16. Bassett LW, Marijikian V, Gold RH. Mammography and breast cancer screening. Surg Clin North Am 1990;70:775-797.
17. Selim A, Tahan SR. Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinoma: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies. Ann Surg 1998;1:95-98.
18. Sickles E. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 1986;160:289-293.