Helical computed tomography of the upper urinory tract;Techniques d'exploration du haut appareil urinaire en tomodensitometrie helicoidale

Feuillets de Radiologie

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-14

  Roy, C ^a   Pfleger, D ^b   Tuchmann, C ^a   Guth, S ^a   Saussine, C ^a   Jacqmin, D ^a  

^a HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Helical CT; Kidney; Tumour

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; KIDNEY COLIC; KIDNEY DISEASE; PYELONEPHRITIS; RENOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STAGHORN STONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0033014571     PISSN: 01819801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Blum A, Régent D. Scanner hélicoïdal : principes et modalités pratiques d'utilisation Masson Ed., Paris 1997; 247 p.
2. Silvermann SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, et al. Small (≤ 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR 1994; 163: 597-605.
3. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, et al. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased in conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (< 3 cm) renal masses. Radiology 1997; 202: 211-7.
4. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobbkin M, Bass JC, Francis IR. Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary phase and nephrographic phase CT scans. Radiologv 1995; 196: 445-51.
5. Zeman RK, Zeiberg A, Hayes WS, Silvermann PM, Cooper C, Garra BS. Helical CT of renal masses: the value of delayed scans. AJR 1996; 167: 771-6.
6. Silverman SG, Pearson GD, Seltzer SE, et al. Small (≤ 3 cm) hyperechoic renal masses: comparison of helical and conventional CT for diagnosing angiomyolipoma. AJR 1996; 167: 877-81.
7. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flak pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995; 194: 789-94.
8. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain. AJR 1996; 166: 97-101.
9. Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted non-contrast helical CT. AJR 1995; 165: 509-13.
10. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur. Radiol. 1998; 8: 212-7.
11. Heneghan JP, Verga M, Dalrymphe N, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC. Soft tissue "Rim sign" in the diagnosis of breteric calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997; 202: 709-11.
12. Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic. Eur. Radiol. 1997; 7: 680-5.
13. Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs on helical unenhanced CT. AJR 1996; 167: 1109-13.
14. Beregi JP, Louvegny S, Ceugnart L, et al. Angioscanographie hélicoïdale des artères rénales. À propos de 300 patients. J. Radiol. 1997; 7: 549-56.
15. Beregi JP, Elkohen M, Deklunder G, Artaud D, Coullet JM, Wattine L. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. AJR 1996; 167: 495-501.
16. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993, 189: 185-92.
17. Rubin Gd, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994, 190: 181-9.
18. Van Hoe L, Vandermeulen D, Gyspeerdt S, Mertens L, Baert AL, Suetens P, Marchal G, Stock X. Assessment of accuracy of renal artery stenosis grading in helical CT angiography using maximum intensity projections. Eur. Radiol. 1996, 6: 658-64.
19. Siegel CL, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Dunnick NR. CT-detected arterial calcification: correlation with renal artery stenosis on angiography. AJR 1994; 163 867-72.