Scale selection for second-order (non-linear) stereopsis

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 21, 1997, Pages 2981-2992

  Wilcox, Laurie M ^a   Hess, Robert F ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

First order; Linear; Non linear; Scale; Second order; Stereoacuity

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTRAST; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0030732484     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00061-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Badcock, D. R. & Schor, C. M. (1985). Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 1211-1215.
2. Carney, T. & Shadlen, M. (1984). Stereopsis for amplitude-modulated gratings: A role for form. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Suppl. 25, p. 294.
3. Fleet, D. J. & Langley, K. (1994). Non-Fourier channels in motion and stereopsis. Perception Suppl., 23, 83.
4. Halpern, D. L. & Blake, R. R. (1988). How contrast affects stereoacuity. Perception, 17, 483-495.
5. Hess, R. F. & Wilcox, L. M. (1994). Linear and non-linear contributions to stereopsis. Vision Research, 34, 2431-2438.
6. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford Psychology Series No. 29. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Jones, D. G. & Malik, J. (1992). A computational framework for determining stereo correspondence from a set of linear spatial filters. Image & Vision Computing, 10, 699-708.
8. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Julesz, B. & Miller, J. E. (1975). Independent spatial frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry. Perception, 4, 125-143.
10. Kovács, I. & Fehér, A. (1996). Non-Fourier information in bandpass noise patterns. Vision Research, 37, 1167-1176.
11. Langley, K. & Fleet, D. J. (1996) Stereopsis from contrast modulation. Vision Research, submitted.
12. Legge, G. E. & Gu, Y. (1989). Stereopsis and contrast. Vision Research, 29, 989-1004.
13. Lin, L. & Wilson, H. (1995). Stereoscopic integration of Fourier and non-Fourier pattern. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Suppl. 36, p 364.
14. Liu, L., Tyler, C. W., Schor, C. M. & Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). Positional disparity is more efficient in encoding depth than phase disparity. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Suppl., 33, 1373.
15. Marr, D. & Poggio, T. (1979). A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 204, 301-328.
16. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C. & Freeman, R. D. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, 249, 1037-1041.
17. Sato, T. & Nishida, S. (1993). Second-order depth perception with texture-defined random-dot stereograms. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Suppl., 34, 1438.
18. Sato, T. & Nishida, S. (1994). Does an envelope-detecting mechanism mediate stereopsis for band-limited stimuli? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Suppl., 35, p. 1916.
19. Schor, C. M. & Wood, I. (1983). Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency. Vision Research, 23, 1649-1654.
20. Schor, C. M., Wood, I. C. & Ogawa, J. (1984). Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis. Vision Research, 24, 573-578.
21. Smallman, H. S. & MacLeod, D. I. A. (1994). Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 2169-2183.
22. max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content. Vision Research, 36, 391-399.
23. Wilcox, L. M. & Hess, R. F. (1996). Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? Vision Research, 36, 391-399.
24. Wilcox, L. M. & Hess, R. F. When stereopsis does NOT depend on contrast. European Conference on Visual Perception. August, 1997.
25. Wilcox, L. M., Elder, J. H. & Hess, R. F. (1996). The effect of stimulus blur and size on stereoacuity. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Suppl., 37, 684.
26. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R. & Halpern, L. D. (1991). Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 229-236.