A novel approach to phylogeny reconstruction from protein sequences

Journal of Molecular Evolution

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 264-273

  Grishin, Nick V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Amniote phylogeny; Evolutionary distance; Phylogenetic tree; Substitution rates

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; GENETIC DISTANCE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0033006875     PISSN: 00222844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00006469     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Du Croz J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A, Ostrouchov S, Sorensen D (1995) LAPACK, user's guide, 2nd edition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
2. Bers L (1969) Calculus. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney, pp 203, 224-225
3. Bulmer M (1991) Use of the method of generalized least squares in reconstructing phylogenies from sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 8: 868-883
4. Buneman P (1974) A note on the metric properties of trees. J Combin Theory (B) 17:48-50
5. Chang JT (1996a) Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. Math Biosci 134:189-215
6. Chang JT (1996b) Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: Identifiability and consistency. Math Biosci 137:51-73
7. DeBry RW (1992) The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol 9:537-551
8. Eernisee DJ, Kluge AG (1993) Taxonomic Congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol Biol Evol 10:1170-1195
9. Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368-376
10. Felsenstein J (1996) Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol 266:418-427
11. Feng DF, Doolittle RF (1997) Converting amino acid alignment scores into measures of evolutionary time: a simulation study of various relationships. J Mol Evol 44:361-370
12. Caspers G-J, Reinders G-J, Leunissen JAM, Wattel J, de Jong WW (1996) Protein sequences indicate that turtles branched off from the amniote tree after mammals. J Mol Evol 42:580-586
13. Grishin NV (1995) Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites. J Mol Evol 41:675-679
14. Grishin NV (1997) Estimation of evolutionary distances from protein spatial structures. J Mol Evol 45:359-369
15. Gu X, Fu Y-X, Li W-H (1995) Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rates among nucleotide sites. Mol Biol Evol 12:546-557
16. Hedges SB (1994) Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2621-2624
17. Hendy MD, Penny D, Steel MA (1994) A discrete Fourier analysis for evolutionary trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3339-3343
18. Holmquist R, Goodman M, Conroy T, Czelusniak J (1983) The spatial distribution of fixed mutations within genes coding for proteins. J Mol Evol 19:437-448
19. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed.) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21-132
20. Kimura M, Ohta T (1972) On the stochastic model for estimation of mutational distance between homologous proteins. J Mol Evol 2: 87-90
21. Kumar S, Rzhetsky A (1996) Evolutionary relationship of eukarytic kingdoms. J Mol Evol 42:183-193
22. Leblanc C, Boyen C, Richard O, Bonnard G, Grienenberger J-M, Kloareg B (1995) Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the rhodophyte Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales). Gene content and genome organization. J Mol Biol 250:484-495
23. Lee MSY (1997) Reptile relationships turn turtle. Nature 389:245-246
24. Olsen GJ (1987) Earliest phylogenetic branching: Comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 52:825-837
25. Ota T, Nei M (1994) Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites. J Mol Evol 38:642-643
26. Platz JE, Conlon JM (1997) ... and turn back again. Nature 389:246
27. Rieppel O, deBraga M (1994) Turtles as diapsid reptiles. Nature 384: 453-455
28. Rzhetsky A, Sitnikova T (1996) When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making. Mol Biol Evol 13:1255-1265
29. Saitou N (1996) Reconstruction of gene trees from sequence data. Methods Enzymol 266:427-449
30. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425
31. Schadt EE, Sinsheimer JS, Lange K (1998) Computational advances in maximum likelihood methods for molecular phylogeny. Genome Res 8:222-233
32. Steel MA, Szekely LA, Hendy MD (1994) Reconstructing trees when sequence sites evolve at variable rates. J Comput Biol 1:153-163
33. Stuart A, Ord JK (1994) Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, Vol 1, 6th ed. Halsted Press, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Toronto, pp 350-351
34. Tajima F, Takezaki N (1994) Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 11: 278-286
35. Tateno Y, Takezaki N, Nei M (1994) Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining and maximum parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Mol Biol Evol 11:261-277
36. Tourasse NJ, Gouy M (1997) Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony. Mol Biol Evol 14:287-298
37. Uzzell T, Corbin KW (1971) Fitting discrete probability distribution to evolutionary events. Science 172:1089-1096
38. Wilkinson M, Thorley J, Benton MJ (1997) Uncertain turtle relationship. Nature 387:466
39. Yang Z (1993) Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol Biol Evol 10:1396-1401
40. Yang Z (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39:306-314
41. Yang Z (1996a) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J Mol Evol 42:294-307
42. Yang Z (1996b) Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J Mol Evol 42:587-596
43. Yang Z, Goldman N, Friday A (1994) Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol Biol Evol 11:316-324
44. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds) Evolving genes and proteins. Academic Press, New York, pp 97-166