First and second-order contributions to surface interpolation

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 14, 1999, Pages 2335-2347

  Wilcox, Laurie M ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

First order; Global; Local; Second order; Surface interpolation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0033005345     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00261-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Badcock D.R., Schor C.M. Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;1211-1215.
2. Cormack L.K., Stevenson S.B., Landers D.D. Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis. Perception. 26(9):1997;1121-1136.
3. Heckmann T., Schor C.M. Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled? Vision Research. 29:1989;593-607.
4. Hess R.F., Wilcox L.M. Linear and non-linear contributions to stereopsis. Vision Research. 34:1994;2431-2438.
5. Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. 1971;University of Chicago, Chicago.
6. Julesz B., Miller J.E. Independent spatial frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry. Perception. 4:1975;125-143.
7. Kovács I., Fehér A. Non-Fourier information in bandpass noise patterns. Vision Research. 37:1997;1167-1177.
8. Lin L., Wilson H. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement. 36:1995;364.
9. Marr D. Vision. 1982;Freeman, New York.
10. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. Interpolation in stereoscopic matching. Nature. 315:1985;402-404t.
11. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation. Vision Research. 27:1987;285-294.
12. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. Interpolation and the detection of fine structure in stereoscopic matching. Vision Research. 27:1987;295-302.
13. Ogle K. Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 43:1953;906-913.
14. Schor C.M., Wood I. Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency. Vision Research. 23:1983;1649-1654.
15. Simmons D., Kingdom F.A.A. Contrast thresholds for stereoscopic depth identification with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli. Vision Research. 34:1994;2971-2982.
16. Smallman H.S., MacLeod D.I.A. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11:1994;2169-2183.
17. Toet A., Koenderink J.J. Differential spatial displacement discrimination of Gabor patches. Vision Research. 28:1988;133-143.
18. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Dmax for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content. Vision Research. 36:1995;391-399.
19. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? Vision Research. 36:1996;391-399.
20. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Scale selection for 2nd-order (non-linear) stereopsis. Vision Research. 37:1997;2981-2992.
21. Yang Y., Blake R. On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation. Vision Research. 35:1995;949-960.
22. Ziegler L., Hess R.F. Linear and non-linear stereoscopic contributions distinguished by task. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science Supplement. 38:1997;906.
23. Ziegler L., Hess R.F. Why is there depth but no shape from uncorrelated micropatterns? Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science (Suppl.). 39:1998;615.