The role of doctors, patients and managers in priority setting decisions: Lessons for the 'Child B' case

Health Expectations

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 61-68

  Ham, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CASE REPORT; CHILD; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; LEUKEMIA; MANAGER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032997691     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00036.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Ham C, Pickard S. Tragic Choices in Health Care. London: King's Fund, 1998.
2. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division Crown Office List Case No. CO./1677/95, The Queen vs. Cambridge District Health Authority, Ex parte 'B'.
3. Entwistle VA., Watt I, Bradbury R, Pehl L. The media and the message. In: Marinker M, (ed) Sense and Sensibility in Health Care. London: BMJ Publishing, 1996: p.157.
4. McHale J., Fox M, Murphy J. Health Care Law: Text, Cases and Material. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1997.
5. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Medical Research Involving Children. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1992: p.12.
6. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Withholding and Withdrawing Life Saving Treatment in Children. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1997: p.12.
7. Alderson P, Montgomery J. Health Care Choices. London: Institute of Public Policy Research, 1996.
8. Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1997; 26: 344.