Hydraulic actuator control with open-centre electrohydraulic valve using a cerebellar model articulation controller neural network algorithm

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering

Volumn 213, Issue 1 I, 1999, Pages 33-48

  Pinsopon, U ^a   Hwang, T ^a   Cetinkunt, S ^a   Ingram, R ^b   Zhang, Q ^b   Cobo, M ^b   Koehler, D ^b   Ottman, R ^c  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

^b CATERPILLAR INC   (United States)

^c MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

CMAC; Control; Earth moving equipment; Hydraulic; Neural network

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; ALGORITHMS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FLOW CONTROL; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; TWO TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS; VALVES (MECHANICAL);

CEREBELLAR MODEL ARTICULATION CONTROLLER; ELECTROHYDRAULIC VALVE; HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR CONTROL; HYDRAULIC CIRCUITS;

HYDRAULIC CONTROL EQUIPMENT;

EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT; HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR; MODEL; NEURAL NETWORK;

EID: 0032979877     PISSN: 09596518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/0959651991540368     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Petersen, I. R. Quadratic stabilizability of uncertain linear systems: existence of a nonlinear stabilizing control does not imply existence of a linear stabilizing control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1985, 30, 291-293.
2. Plummer, A. R. and Vaughan, N. D. Robust adaptive control for hydraulic servosystems. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt, Control, 1996, 118, 237-244.
3. Sherman, S. T. and Lance, G. M. A design study of a positioning system with electrohydraulic actuation. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1987, pp. 1853-1858.
4. Vossoughi, G. and Donath, M. Dynamic feedback lineariz-ation for electrohydraulically actuated control system. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt, Control, 1995, 117, 468-477.
5. Finney, J. M., de Pennington, A., Bloor, M. S. and Gill, G. S. A pole placement controller for an electrohydraulic cylinder drive. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt, Control, 1985, 107, 145-150.
6. Vaughan, N. D. and Whiting, I. M. Microprocessor control applied to a nonlinear electrohydraulic position servo system. In Proceedings of the Seventh Fluid Power Symposium, UK, 1986, pp. 187-198.
7. Daley, S. Application of a fast self-tuning control algorithm to a hydraulic test rig. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1987, 201 (C4), 285-295.
8. Hwang, C. L. and Lan, C. H. The position control of electrohydraulic servomechanism via a novel variable structure control. Mechatronics, 1994, 4(4), 369-391.
9. Zhao, T. and Virvalo, T. Fuzzy control of a hydraulic position servo with unknown load. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, California, 1993, pp. 785-788 (IEEE, New York).
10. Corbet, T., Sepehri, N. and Lawrence, P. D. Fuzzy control of a class of hydraulically actuated industrial robots. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol., 1996, 4(4), 419-426.
11. Cobo, M. Velocity servo control system design for wheel type loader earthmoving equipment. MS thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1996.
12. Hunt, K. J., Sbarbaro, K., Zbikowski, R. and Gawthrop, P. J. Neural networks for control systems - a survey. Automatica, 1995.
13. Merrit, H. E. Hydraulic Control Systems, 1967 (John Wiley, New York).
14. Albus, J. S. Brains, Behaviour, and Robotics, 1981 (Byte Books).