Toward an expanding methodological base in leisure studies: Researchers' knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning qualitative research;Pour un élargissement de La base méthodologique des études du loisir: Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques des chercheurs relativement à La recherche qualitative;Para una expansión de la base metodológica de los estudios del ocio: Conocimientos, actitudes y practicas de los investigadores con relacion a la investigacion cualitativa

Loisir et Societe

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 435-451

  Weissinger, Ellen ^a   Henderson, Karla A ^b   Bowling, Christopher P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039384559     PISSN: 07053436     EISSN: 17050154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07053436.1997.10715552     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BEDINI, L.A., and Wu, Y. (1994). “A methodological review of research in the Therapeutic Recreation Journal 1986-1990.” Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 28, 87-98.
2. BUCHANAN, D.R. (1992). “An uneasy alliance: Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods.” Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 117-135.
3. BULLOCK, C.C. (1983). “Qualitative research in therapeutic recreation.” Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 17, 36-43.
4. GLANCY, M. (1986). “Participant observation in the recreation setting.” Journal of Leisure Research, 18, 59-80.
5. GLANCY, M., and LITTLE, S.L. (1995). “Studying the social aspects of leisure: Development of the multiple-method field investigation model (MMFI).” Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 305-325.
6. GLINER, J.A. (1994). “Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor.” The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14(2), 78-90.
7. GOODALE, T.L. (1990). “Perceived freedom as leisure’s antithesis.” Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 296-302.
8. HEMINGWAY, J.L. (1990). “Opening windows on an interpretive leisure studies.” Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 303-308.
9. HENDERSON, K.A. (1990). “Leisure science, dominant paradigms, and philosophy: An introduction.” Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 283-290.
10. HENDERSON, K.A. (1991). Dimensions of choice: A qualitative approach to recreation, parks, and leisure research. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
11. HENDERSON, K.A. (1993). ‘“The changer and the changed:’ Leisure research in the 1990’s.” Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 18, 3-18.
12. HENDERSON, K.A., and BEDINI, L.A. (1994/95). “Where are the numbers? Evaluating research using qualitative data in therapeutic recreation.” Annual in Therapeutic Recreation, 5, 38-47.
13. HENDERSON, K.A., and BEDINI, L.A. (1995). “Notes on linking qualitative and quantitative data.” Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29, 124-130.
14. Howe, C.Z. (1985). “Possibilities of using a qualitative approach in the sociological study of leisure.” Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 212-224.
15. HOWE, C.Z. (1988). “Using qualitative structured interviews in leisure research: Illustrations from one case study.” Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 305-323.
16. HOWE, C.Z. (1991). “Considerations when using phenomenology in leisure inquiry: Beliefs, methods, and analysis in naturalistic research.” Leisure Studies, 10, 49-62.
17. HOWE, C.Z., and KELLER, M.J. (1988). “The use of triangulation as an evaluation technique: Illustrations from a regional symposium in therapeutic recreation.” Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 22, 36-45.
18. LECOMPTE, M.D., PREISSLE, J., and TESCH, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
19. LEE, Y. (1990). A phenomenological approach to investigating immediate leisure experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
20. LEE, Y., BROCK, S., DATTILO, J., and KLEIBER, D. (1993). “Leisure and adjustment to spinal cord injury: Conceptual and methodological suggestions.” Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 27, 200-211.
21. McCormick, B.P. (1996). “N = 1: What can be learned from the single case?” Leisure Sciences, 18, 365-369.
22. MCCORMICK, B., SCOTT, D., and DATILLO, J. (1991). “Answering questions about therapeutic recreation, Part 1: Formulating research questions.” Annual in Therapeutic Recreation, 2, 78-84.
23. MOBILY, K. E. (1989). “Other ways of knowing.” In D.E. Compton (Ed.), Issues in therapeutic recreation: A profession in transition (pp. 125-142).
24. RIDDICK, C.C., DESCHRIVER, M., and WEISSINGER, E. (1984). “A methodological review of the Journal of Leisure Research from 1978-1982.” Journal of Leisure Research, 16,311-321.
25. RIDDICK, C.C., DESCHRIVER, M„ and WEISSINGER, E. (1988). A methodological review of the Journal of Leisure Research from 1983-1987. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
26. SYLVESTER, C. (1990). “Interpretation and leisure science: A hermeneutical example of past and present oracles.” Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 291-295.
27. WEISSINGER, E. (1990). “Of revolutions and resistance: A response to philosophical criticisms of social scientific leisure research.” Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 309-316.
28. WEISSINGER, E., BOWLING, C. P., and HENDERSON, K.A. (1996). “Curriculum requirements in, and student attitudes toward, qualitative research training in leisure studies doctoral programs.” Schole, 11, 23-35.