Protective effect of Rhinax, a herbal formulation against physical and chemical factors induced gastric and duodenal ulcers in rats

Indian Journal of Pharmacology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 128-132

  Dhuley, J N ^a  

^a Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd   (India)

Author keywords

Cytoprotection; Gastric duodenal ulcer; Rhinax

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ALCIAN BLUE; ALCOHOL; ANTIULCER AGENT; FAMOTIDINE; HERBACEOUS AGENT; MERCAPTAMINE; OMEPRAZOLE; RHINAX; SCAVENGER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLD STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUODENUM ULCER; HERBAL MEDICINE; IMMOBILIZATION STRESS; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PYLORUS LIGATION; RAT; STOMACH ACID SECRETION; STOMACH JUICE; STOMACH MUCUS; STOMACH PH; STOMACH ULCER;

EID: 0032959832     PISSN: 02537613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sanyal AK, Mitra PK, Goel RK. A modified method to estimate dissolved mucosubstances in gastric juice. Indian J Exp Biol 1983;21:78-80.
2. Freston JW. Overview of medical therapy of peptic ulecer disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1990;19:121-40.
3. Robert A. Current history of cytoprotection. Gastroenterology 1981;21:89-96.
4. Marini - Bettolo, G. B. Present aspects of the use of Medicinal plants in traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 1980;2:5-7.
5. 4-induced liver injury and survival in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 1997;56:159-64.
6. Dhuley JN, Naik SR . Effect of Rhinax on bacterial llpopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia in rats. Indian J Exp Biol 1998;36:315-7.
7. Derelanko MJ, Long JF. Carboenoxolone sodium protects rat gastric mucosa against ethanol - induced necrosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 198;166:394-7.
8. Goel RK, Tavares IA, Bennet A. Effect of ethanol on eicosanoid synthesis by human gastric and colonic mucosal pieces. Br J Pharmaco. 1990;99: 289-92.
9. Aguwa CN, Mittal GC. Study of antiulcer activity of an aqueous extract of Pvrenaeiitha masdtii (family : Leacinaceae) using various models of experimental gastric ulcers in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1987;74:215-9.
10. Borella LE, Seethaler K, Lipman W. Antipeptic, antiulcer activities and antagonism of gastric emptying Arzneim Forsch 1979;29:793-8.
11. Shay H, Komarov SA, Fels SS, Meranze D, Gruenstein M, Siplet H. A simple method of the uniform production of gastric ulceration. Gastroenterology 1945;5:43-61.
12. Parmar NS, Hennings G, Gulati OP. The gastric antisecretory activity of 3-methoxy-5,7,3,4, tetra hydroxy flavan (ME) - a specific histidine decarboxylase inhibitor in rats. Agents Actions 1984;15:143-5.
13. Corney SJ, Morrisay SM, Woods RJ. A method for the quantitative estimation of gastric barrier mucus. Proc Physiol Soc 1974;242:116-7.
14. Souza-Formigoni MLO, Oliveria MOM, Monteiro MU, Sileira-Filho NO, Braz S, Carlini EA. Antiulcerogenic effect of two Maytemus species in laboratory animals. J Ethnopharmacol 1991;34:21-7.
15. Piper DW, Stiel DD. Pathogenesis of chronic peptic ulcer, current thinking and clinical implications. Med Prog 1986;2:7-10.
16. Bilski J, Sarosiek J, Murty VLN, Aono M, Moriga M, Slomiany A, Slomiany BL. Enhancement of the lipid content and physical properties of gastric mucus geranylacetone. Biochem Pharmacol 1987;36:4059-65.
17. Brown GG. An introduction to Histotechnology. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, 1978; pp 293-308.
18. Glavin GB, Szabo S. Experimental gastric mucosal injury, laboratory models reveal mechanism of pathogenesis and new therapeutic strategies. FASEB J 1992;6:821-5.