Medicaid recipients' experiences under mandatory managed care

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 413-426

  Chaudry, Rosemary V ^a   Brandon, William P ^a   Schoeps, Nancy B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MANAGED CARE; MEDICAID; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MEDICAID; NORTH CAROLINA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032953486     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hurley RE, Freund DA, Paul JE. Managed Care in Medicaid. Ann Arbor, MI:Health Administration Press; 1993.
2. Rowland D, Salganicoff A. Lessons from Medicaid: Improving access to office-based care for the low-income population. Am J Public Health 1994;84:550-552.
3. Kongstvedt PR. Managing basic medical-surgical utilization. In: Kongstvedt PR, ed. Essentials of Managed Health Care. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen;1997:199-224.
4. Armstead RC, Gorman JK. Baby love and budget relief: Some promising practices in prenatal managed care in Medicaid. J Am Med Wom Assoc 1995;50:178-181.
5. American Public Health Association. APHA policy paper: Public health services and managed care. The Nation's Health October 1996:12-13.
6. Ware JE, Bayliss MS, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and traditional Medicaid systems: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1996;276:1039-1047.
7. American Nurses Association. Managed care problems stem from lack of clear standards. The American Nurse October 1996:8.
8. Reid RJ, Hurtado M, Starfield B. Managed care, primary care, and quality for children. Curr Opin Pediatr 1996;8:164-170.
9. Rosenbaum S, Hughes D, Butler E, Howard D. Incantations in the dark: Medicaid, managed care, and maternity care. Milbank Q 1988;66:661-693.
10. Hurley RE, Kirschner L, Bone TW. Medicaid managed care. In: Kongstvedt PR, ed. Essentials of Managed Care. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:Aspen;1997:432-450.
11. North Carolina Department of Insurance, Managed Care and Health Benefits Division. HMOs in North Carolina: Status Report and Analysis of 1996 Activity. Raleigh, NC:North Carolina Division of Insurance;1998.
12. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Medical Assistance. Request for Waiver Renewal Under the Provisions of Section 1915(b)(1) of the Social Security Act. Raleigh NC: North Carolina Department of Human Resources;1995.
13. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services. Medicaid Eligibility Files. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services; September 9, 1996.
14. Chaudry RV, Brandon WB, Schoeps NB. Surveys of Medicaid Recipients' Access, Satisfaction, and Health Service Use: Baseline Data for the Evaluation of a Mandatory Managed Care Program. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina Charlotte;1998.
15. Lincoln YS. Sympathetic connections between qualitative methods and health research. Qual Health Res 1992;2:375-391.
16. Beaudin CL, Pelletier LR. Consumer-based research: Using focus groups as a method for evaluating quality of care. J Nurs Care Qual 1996;10:28-33.
17. Stevens PE. Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Publ Health Nurs 1996;13:170-176.
18. Morgan DL. The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;1998.
19. Patton MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage;1997.
20. Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation. 5th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage;1993.
21. Epstein AM. Medicaid managed care and high quality: Can we have both? JAMA 1997;278:1617-1621.
22. Royce D, Thayer BA. Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall;1996.
23. Morse JM, Field PA. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage;1995.
24. Wooldridge J, Ku K, Coughlin T, et al. Implementing State Health Care Reform: What Have We Learned From the First Year. The first annual report of the evaluation of health reform in five states. Princeton, NJ:Mathematica Policy Research;1996.
25. Hynes MM, Reisinger AL, Sisk JE, Gorman SA. Women in New York city's Medicaid program: A report on satisfaction, access, and use. J Am Med Wom Assoc 1998;53:83-88.
26. Temkin-Greener H, Winchell M. Medicaid beneficiaries under managed care: Provider choice and satisfaction. Health Serv Res 1991;26:509-529.
27. Sisk JE, Gorman SA, Reisinger L, Glied SA, DuMouchel WH, Hynes MH. Evaluation of Medicaid managed care: Satisfaction, access, and use. JAMA 1996;276:50-55.
28. Begley CE, Wong PL, Abbott AL, Aday LA. Medicaid managed care in Texas: What have we learned from the pilots? Eval Health Prof 1997;20:302-323.
29. Morgan DL. Planning Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
30. University of North Carolina Charlotte, Office of Research. Guidelines for the Review of Research Involving Human Subjects. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina Charlotte; 1997.
31. Krueger RA. Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
32. Krueger RA. Developing Questions for Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage; 1998.
33. Krueger RA. Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage; 1998.
34. Krueger RA. Focus Groups. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage; 1994.
35. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
36. Bodenheimer T. The HMO backlash: Righteous or reactionary? N Engl J Med 1996;335:1601-1604.
37. Cunningham R. Backlash: How worried should health plans be? Medicine & Health Perspectives; June 3, 1996.
38. Schur CL, Dorosh E. Attitude toward cost-containment features of managed care: Differences among patient subgroups. Am J Managed Care 1998;4:1385-1391.
39. Boland P. Cited in: Cunningham R. Backlash: How worried should health plans be? Medicine & Health Perspectives; June 3, 1996.
40. Newhouse JP, The Insurance Experiment Group. Free For All? Lessons From the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.