Female mating behaviour, sexual selection and chromosome I inversion karyotype in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida

Heredity

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 276-281

  Gilburn, André S ^a,b   Day, Thomas H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chromosomal inversions; Coelopa frigida; Female choice; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

GENETIC CROSS; GENETIC SELECTION; KARYOTYPING; MATING SYSTEM;

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FLY; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ALGAE; COELOPA FRIGIDA; COELOPIDAE; DIPTERA; INSECTA;

EID: 0032948533     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884830     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ARNQVIST, G., ROWE, L., KRUPA, J. AND SIH, A. 1996. Assortative mating by size: a meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders. Evol. Ecol., 10, 265-284.
2. BAKKER, T. C. M. AND POMIANKOWSKI, A. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol., 8, 129-171.
3. BUTLIN, R. K. AND DAY, T. H. 1989. Environmental correlates of inversion frequencies in natural populations of seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). Heredity, 62, 223-232.
4. BUTLIN, R. K., READ, I. L. AND DAY, T. H. 1982. The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 49, 51-62.
5. BUTLIN, R. K., COLLINS, P. M. AND DAY, T. H. 1984. The effect of larval density on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 52, 415-423.
6. CREAN, C. S. 1997. Variation in Female Mate Preferences in the Seaweed Fly, Coelopa frigida. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.
7. CREAN, C. C. AND GILBURN, A. S. 1998. Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly, Coelopa ursina (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav., 56, 1405-1410.
8. DAY, T. H. and GILBURN, A. S. 1997. Sexual selection in seaweed flies. Adv. Study Behav., 26, 1-58.
9. DAY, T. H., DOBSON, T., HILLIER, P. C., PARKIN, D. T. AND CLARKE, B. C. 1982. Associations of enzymic and chromosomal polymorphisms in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 48, 35-44.
10. DAY, T. H., CREAN, C. S., GILBURN, A. S., SHUKER, D. M. AND WILCOCKSON, R. W. 1996. Sexual selection in seaweed flies: genetic variation in male size and its reliability as an indicator in natural populations. Proc. R. Soc. B., 263, 1127-1134.
11. FAIRBAIRN, D. J. 1988. Sexual selection for homogamy in the Gerridae: an extension of Ridley's comparative approach. Evolution, 42, 1212-1222.
12. FAIRBAIRN, D. J. 1990. Factors influencing sexual size dimorphism in temperate waterstriders. Am. Nat., 136, 61-86.
13. FAIRBAIRN, D. J. AND PREZIOSI, R. F. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the waterstrider, Aquarius remigis. Am. Nat., 144, 101-108.
14. GILBURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1994a. Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proc. R. Soc. B., 255, 159-165.
15. GILBURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1994b. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and the αβ inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Proc. R. Soc. B., 257, 303-309.
16. GILBURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1994c. The inheritance of female mating behaviour in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Genet. Res., 64, 19-25.
17. GILBURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1996. The evolution of female choice when the preference and the preferred trait are linked to the same inversion system. Heredity, 76, 19-27.
18. GILBURN, A. S., FOSTER, S. P. AND DAY, T. H. 1992. Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 69, 209-216.
19. GILBURN, A. S., FOSTER, S. P. AND DAY, T. H. 1993. Genetic correlation between a female mating preference and the male preferred character in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Evolution, 47, 1788-1795.
20. GILBURN, A. S., CREAN, C. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1996. Sexual selection in natural populations of seaweed flies: variation in the offspring fitness of females carrying different inversion karyotypes. Proc. R. Soc. B., 263, 249-256.
21. KIRKPATRICK, M. AND BARTON, N. H. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, 1282-1286.
22. ROWE, L., ARNQVIST, G., SIH, A. AND KRUPA, J. J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 289-293.
23. RYAN, M. J. AND RAND, A. S. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution, 44, 305-314.
24. RYAN, M. J., FOX, J. H., WILCYNSKI, W. AND RAND, A. S. 1990. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343, 66-67.
25. SIH, A. AND KRUPA, J. J. 1992. Predation risk, food deprivation and non-random mating by size in the stream-water strider, Aquarius remigis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 31, 51-56.
26. WILCOCKSON, R. W., CREAN, C. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1995. Heritability of a sexually selected character. Nature, 374, 158-159.