The evolution of female choice when the preference and the preferred trait are linked to the same inversion system

Heredity

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 19-27

  Gilburn, André S ^a,b   Day, Thomas H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chromosomal inversions; Coelopa frigida; Female choice; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

COELOPA FRIGIDA;

EID: 0030042766     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1996.3     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ANDERSON, W., DODZHANSKY, TH., PAVLOVSKY, O., POWELL, J. AND YARDLEY, D. 1975. Genetics of natural populations XLII. Three decades of genetic change in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution, 29, 24-36.
2. ANDERSSON, M. B. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 17, 375-392.
3. ANDERSSON, M. B. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution, 40, 809-816.
4. ANDERSSON, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. BELL, G. 1978. The handicap principle in sexual selection. Evolution, 32, 872-885.
6. BIRCH, L. C. 1955. Selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura in relation to crowding. Evolution, 9, 389-399.
7. BUDNIK, M., BRNCIK, D. AND KOREF-SANTIBANEZ, S. 1971. The effects of crowding on chromosomal polymorphism of Drosophila pavani. Evolution, 25, 410-419.
8. BUTLIN, R. K. AND DAY, T. H. 1985. Adult size, longevity and fecundity in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 54, 107-110.
9. BUTLIN, R. K. AND DAY, T. H. 1989. Environmental correlates of inversion frequencies in natural populations of seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). Heredity, 62, 223-232.
10. BUTLIN, R. K., READ, I. L. AND DAY, T. H. 1982. The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 49, 51-62.
11. BUTLIN, R. K., COLLINS, P. M. AND DAY, T. H. 1984. The effect of larval density on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 52, 415-423.
12. CHARLESWORTH, B. 1988. The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. J. Theor. Biol., 130, 191-204.
13. DA CUNHA, A. B. 1955. Chromosomal polymorphism in the Diptera. Adv. Genet., 7, 93-138.
14. DAY, T. H., DOBSON, T., HILLIER, P. C., PARKIN, D. T. AND CLARKE, B. C. 1982. Associations of enzymic and chromosomal polymorphisms in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 48, 35-44.
15. DAY, T. H., DAWE, C., DOBSON, T. AND HILLIER, P. C. 1983. A chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Scandinavian populations of the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Hereditas, 99, 135-145.
16. DAY, T. H., FOSTER, S. P. AND PITAFI, K. D. 1992. The counteraction of sexual and natural selection in seaweed flies. Genet. (Life Sci. Adv.), 11, 51-58.
17. DOBZHANSKY, Th. 1947. Genetics of natural populations XIV. A response of certain gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura to natural selection. Genetics, 32, 142-160.
18. DUBININ, N. P. AND TINIAKOV, G. G. 1946. Structural chromosome variability in urban and rural populations of Drosophila funebris. Am. Nat., 80, 393-396.
19. FISHER, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. FOWLER, K AND PARTRIDGE, L. 1989. A cost to mating in female fruitflies. Nature, 338, 760-761.
21. GILBURN, A. s. AND DAY, T. H. 1994a. Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proc. R. Soc. B, 255, 159-165.
22. GILBURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1994b. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and the αβ inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Proc. R. Soc. B, 257, 303-309.
23. GILDURN, A. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1994c. The inheritance of female mating behaviour in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Genet. Res., 64, 19-25.
24. GILBURN, A. S., FOSTER, S. P. AND DAY, T. H. 1992. Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 69, 209-216.
25. GILBURN, A. S., FOSTER, S. P. AND DAY, T. H. 1993. Genetic correlation between a female mating preference and the male preferred character in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Evolution, 47, 1788-1795.
26. GOMULKIEWICZ, R. S. AND HASTINGS, A. 1990. Ploidy and evolution by sexual selection: a comparison of haploid and diploid female choice models near fixation equilibria. Evolution, 44, 757-770.
27. HAMILTON, W. D. AND ZUK, M. 1982. Heritable true fitnesses and bright birds: a role for parasites. Science, 218, 384-387.
28. IWASA, Y., POMIANKOWSKI, A. AND NEE, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution, 45, 1431-1442.
29. KANESHIRO, K. J. 1987. The dynamics of sexual selection and its pleiotropic effects. Behav. Genet., 17, 559-569.
30. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36, 1-12.
31. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1985. Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the "sexy son". Am. Nat., 125, 788-810.
32. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1986. The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work. Am. Nat., 127, 222-240.
33. KIRKPATRICK, M. AND RYAN, M. J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350, 33-38.
34. LANDE, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 78, 3721-3725.
35. LEWONTIN, R. C. AND WHITE, M. J. D. 1960. Interaction between inversion polymorphism of two chromosome pairs in the grasshopper, Moraba scurra. Evolution, 14, 116-129.
36. OTTO, S. P. 1991. On evolution under sexual and viability selection: a two-locus model. Evolution, 45, 1443-1457.
37. PARKER, G. A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson, P. (ed.) Mate Choice, pp. 141-166. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
38. PARTRIDGE, L., GREEN, A. AND FOWLER, K. 1987. Effects of egg production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol., 33, 745-749.
39. PITAFI, K. D. 1991. Male mate choice in seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.
40. POMIANKOWSKI, A. 1987a. Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work - sometimes. Proc. R. Soc. B, 231, 123-145.
41. POMIANKOWSKI, A. 1987b. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol., 128, 195-218.
42. POMIANKOWSKI, A., IWASA, Y. AND NEE, S. 1991. The evol-tion of costly mate preferences I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution, 45, 1422-1430.
43. ROWE, L., ARNOVIST, G., SIH, A. AND KRUPA, J. J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 289-293.
44. TRICKETT, A. J. AND BUTLIN, R. K. 1994. Recombination suppressors and the evolution of new species. Heredity, 73, 339-345.
45. SHAW, K. 1995. Phylogenetic tests of the sensory exploitation model of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 10, 117-120.
46. WILCOCKSON, R. W., CREAN, C. S. AND DAY, T. H. 1995. Heritability of a sexually selected character. Nature, 374, 158-159.
47. ZAHAVI, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol., 53, 205-214.